The plumbing for offline unwinding when we throw an exception in
programs would require walking the stack, hence introduce a new
arch_bpf_stack_walk function. This is provided when the JIT supports
exceptions, i.e. bpf_jit_supports_exceptions is true. The arch-specific
code is really minimal, hence it should be straightforward to extend
this support to other architectures as well, as it reuses the logic of
arch_stack_walk, but allowing access to unwind_state data.

Once the stack pointer and frame pointer are known for the main subprog
during the unwinding, we know the stack layout and location of any
callee-saved registers which must be restored before we return back to
the kernel. This handling will be added in the subsequent patches.

Note that while we primarily unwind through BPF frames, which are
effectively CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER, we still need one of this or
CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC to be able to unwind through the bpf_throw frame
from which we begin walking the stack. We also require both sp and bp
(stack and frame pointers) from the unwind_state structure, which are
only available when one of these two options are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-3-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

We would like to know whether a bpf_prog corresponds to the main prog or
one of the subprogs. The current JIT implementations simply check this
using the func_idx in bpf_prog->aux->func_idx. When the index is 0, it
belongs to the main program, otherwise it corresponds to some
subprogram.

This will also be necessary to halt exception propagation while walking
the stack when an exception is thrown, so we add a simple helper
function to check this, named bpf_is_subprog, and convert existing JIT
implementations to also make use of it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-2-memxor@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Puranjay Mohan says:

====================
arm32, bpf: add support for cpuv4 insns

Changes in V2 -> V3
- Added comments at places where there could be confustion.
- In the patch for DIV64, fix the if-else case that would never run.
- In the same patch use a single instruction to POP caller saved regs.
- Add a patch to change maintainership of ARM32 BPF JIT.

Changes in V1 -> V2:
- Fix coding style issues.
- Don't use tmp variable for src in emit_ldsx_r() as it is redundant.
- Optimize emit_ldsx_r() when offset can fit in immediate.

Add the support for cpuv4 instructions for ARM32 BPF JIT. 64-bit division
was not supported earlier so this series adds 64-bit DIV, SDIV, MOD, SMOD
instructions as well.

This series needs any one of the patches from [1] to disable zero-extension
for BPF_MEMSX to support ldsx.

The relevant selftests have passed expect ldsx_insn which needs fentry:

Tested on BeagleBone Black (ARMv7-A):

[root@alarm del]# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
[root@alarm del]# ./test_progs -a verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap
#337/1   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK
#337/2   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK
#337/3   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK
#337/4   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK
#337/5   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK
#337/6   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK
#337     verifier_bswap:OK
#351/1   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK
#351/2   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK
#351     verifier_gotol:OK
#359/1   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK
#359/2   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK
#359/3   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK
#359/4   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK
#359/5   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK
#359/6   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK
#359/7   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK
#359/8   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK
#359/9   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK
#359/10  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK
#359/11  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK
#359     verifier_ldsx:OK
#370/1   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK
#370/2   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
#370/3   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK
#370/4   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
#370/5   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK
#370/6   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
#370/7   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK
#370/8   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
#370/9   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK
#370/10  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK
#370/11  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK
#370/12  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
#370/13  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK
#370/14  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
#370/15  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK
#370/16  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK
#370/17  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK
#370/18  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
#370/19  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK
#370/20  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
#370/21  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK
#370/22  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK
#370/23  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK
#370/24  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK
#370     verifier_movsx:OK
#382/1   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
#382/2   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/3   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
#382/4   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/5   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
#382/6   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/7   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
#382/8   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/9   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
#382/10  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/11  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
#382/12  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/13  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
#382/14  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
#382/15  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
#382/16  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
#382/17  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
#382/18  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/19  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
#382/20  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/21  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
#382/22  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/23  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
#382/24  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/25  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
#382/26  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/27  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
#382/28  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/29  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
#382/30  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
#382/31  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
#382/32  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
#382/33  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
#382/34  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/35  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
#382/36  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/37  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
#382/38  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/39  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
#382/40  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/41  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
#382/42  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/43  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
#382/44  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/45  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
#382/46  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/47  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
#382/48  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/49  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
#382/50  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/51  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
#382/52  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/53  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
#382/54  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/55  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
#382/56  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/57  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
#382/58  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/59  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
#382/60  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/61  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
#382/62  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/63  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
#382/64  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/65  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
#382/66  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/67  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
#382/68  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/69  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
#382/70  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/71  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
#382/72  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/73  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
#382/74  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/75  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
#382/76  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/77  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
#382/78  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/79  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
#382/80  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/81  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
#382/82  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/83  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
#382/84  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/85  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
#382/86  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/87  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
#382/88  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/89  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
#382/90  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/91  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
#382/92  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/93  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
#382/94  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
#382/95  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
#382/96  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
#382/97  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
#382/98  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
#382/99  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
#382/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
#382/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
#382/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
#382/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
#382/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
#382/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
#382/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
#382/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
#382/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
#382/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
#382/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
#382/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
#382/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
#382/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK
#382/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
#382/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK
#382/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
#382/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK
#382/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
#382/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK
#382/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
#382     verifier_sdiv:OK
Summary: 5/163 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

As the selftests don't compile for 32-bit architectures without
modifications due to long being 32-bit,
I have added new tests to lib/test_bpf.c for cpuv4 insns, all are passing:

test_bpf: Summary: 1052 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [891/1040 JIT'ed]
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 10 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [10/10 JIT'ed]
test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/mb61p5y4u3ptd.fsf@amazon.com/
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-1-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

As Shubham has been inactive since 2017, Add myself for ARM32 BPF JIT.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-10-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The BPF JITs now support cpuv4 instructions. Add tests for these new
instructions to the test suite:

1. Sign extended Load
2. Sign extended Mov
3. Unconditional byte swap
4. Unconditional jump with 32-bit offset
5. Signed division and modulo
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-9-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Now that all the cpuv4 instructions are supported by the arm32 JIT,
enable the selftests for arm32.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-8-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

ARM32 doesn't have instructions to do 64-bit/64-bit divisions. So, to
implement the following instructions:
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SDIV
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SMOD

We implement the above instructions by doing function calls to div64_u64()
and div64_u64_rem() for unsigned division/mod and calls to div64_s64()
for signed division/mod.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-7-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The cpuv4 added a new BPF_SDIV instruction that does signed division.
The encoding is similar to BPF_DIV but BPF_SDIV sets offset=1.

ARM32 already supports 32-bit BPF_DIV which can be easily extended to
support BPF_SDIV as ARM32 has the SDIV instruction. When the CPU is not
ARM-v7, we implement that SDIV/SMOD with the function call similar to
the implementation of DIV/MOD.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-6-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The cpuv4 added a new unconditional bswap instruction with following
behaviour:

BPF_ALU64 | BPF_TO_LE | BPF_END with imm = 16/32/64 means:
dst = bswap16(dst)
dst = bswap32(dst)
dst = bswap64(dst)

As we already support converting to big-endian from little-endian we can
use the same for unconditional bswap. just treat the unconditional scenario
the same as big-endian conversion.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-5-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The cpuv4 added a new BPF_MOVSX instruction that sign extends the src
before moving it to the destination.

BPF_ALU | BPF_MOVSX sign extends 8-bit and 16-bit operands into 32-bit
operands, and zeroes the remaining upper 32 bits.

BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOVSX sign extends 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit  operands
into 64-bit operands.

The offset field of the instruction is used to tell the number of bit to
use for sign-extension. BPF_MOV and BPF_MOVSX have the same code but the
former sets offset to 0 and the later one sets the offset to 8, 16 or 32

The behaviour of this instruction is dst = (s8,s16,s32)src

On ARM32 the implementation uses LSH and ARSH to extend the 8/16 bits to
a 32-bit register and then it is sign extended to the upper 32-bit
register using ARSH. For 32-bit we just move it to the destination
register and use ARSH to extend it to the upper 32-bit register.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-4-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The cpuv4 added the support of an instruction that is similar to load
but also sign-extends the result after the load.

BPF_MEMSX | <size> | BPF_LDX means dst = *(signed size *) (src + offset)
here <size> can be one of BPF_B, BPF_H, BPF_W.

ARM32 has instructions to load a byte or a half word with sign
extension into a 32bit register. As the JIT uses two 32 bit registers
to simulate a 64-bit BPF register, an extra instruction is emitted to
sign-extent the result up to the second register.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-3-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

The cpuv4 adds unconditional jump with 32-bit offset where the immediate
field of the instruction is to be used to calculate the jump offset.

BPF_JA | BPF_K | BPF_JMP32 => gotol +imm => PC += imm.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-2-puranjay12@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

There is no fundamental reason, why multi-buffer XDP and XDP kfunc RX hints
cannot coexist in a single program.

Allow those features to be used together by modifying the flags condition
for dev-bound-only programs, segments are still prohibited for fully
offloaded programs, hence additional check.
Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAKH8qBuzgtJj=OKMdsxEkyML36VsAuZpcrsXcyqjdKXSJCBq=Q@mail.gmail.com/Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230915083914.65538-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Stanislav Fomichev says:

====================
Extend netdev netlink family to expose the bitmask with the
kfuncs that the device implements. The source of truth is the
device's xdp_metadata_ops. There is some amount of auto-generated
netlink boilerplate; the change itself is super minimal.

v2:
- add netdev->xdp_metadata_ops NULL check when dumping to netlink (Martin)

Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
====================
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

The tool can be used to verify that everything works end to end.

Unrelated updates:
- include tools/include/uapi to pick the latest kernel uapi headers
- print "xdp-features" and "xdp-rx-metadata-features" so it's clear
  which bitmask is being dumped

Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913171350.369987-4-sdf@google.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Add new xdp-rx-metadata-features member to netdev netlink
which exports a bitmask of supported kfuncs. Most of the patch
is autogenerated (headers), the only relevant part is netdev.yaml
and the changes in netdev-genl.c to marshal into netlink.

Example output on veth:

$ ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 # ifndex == 12
$ ./tools/net/ynl/samples/netdev 12

Select ifc ($ifindex; or 0 = dump; or -2 ntf check): 12
   veth1[12]    xdp-features (23): basic redirect rx-sg xdp-rx-metadata-features (3): timestamp hash xdp-zc-max-segs=0

Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913171350.369987-3-sdf@google.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

No functional changes.

Instead of having hand-crafted code in bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc,
move kfunc <> xmo handler relationship into XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_xxx.
This way, any time new kfunc is added, we don't have to touch
bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc.

Also document XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_xxx arguments since we now have
more than two and it might be confusing what is what.

Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913171350.369987-2-sdf@google.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Userspace applications indicate their multi-buffer capability to xsk
using XSK_USE_SG socket bind flag. For sockets using shared umem the
bind flag may contain XSK_USE_SG only for the first socket. For any
subsequent socket the only option supported is XDP_SHARED_UMEM.

Add option XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG in umem config flags to store the
multi-buffer handling capability when indicated by XSK_USE_SG option in
bing flag by the first socket. Use this to derive multi-buffer capability
for subsequent sockets in xsk core.
Signed-off-by: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Fixes: 81470b5c ("xsk: introduce XSK_USE_SG bind flag for xsk socket")
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907035032.2627879-1-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Current code charges modmem for regular trampoline, but not for struct_ops
trampoline. Add bpf_jit_[charge|uncharge]_modmem() to struct_ops so the
trampoline is charged in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914222542.2986059-1-song@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

This test relies on bpf_testmod, so skip it if the module is not available.

Fixes: aa3d65de ("bpf/selftests: Test fentry attachment to shadowed functions")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230914124928.340701-1-asavkov@redhat.com

Magnus Karlsson says:

====================
seltests/xsk: various improvements to xskxceiver

This patch set implements several improvements to the xsk selftests
test suite that I thought were useful while debugging the xsk
multi-buffer code and tests. The largest new feature is the ability to
be able to execute a single test instead of the whole test suite. This
required some surgery on the current code, details below.

Anatomy of the path set:

1: Print useful info on a per packet basis with the option -v

2: Add a timeout in the transmission loop too. We only used to have
   one for the Rx thread, but Tx can lock up too waiting for
   completions.

3: Add an option (-m) to only run the tests (or a single test with a
   later patch) in a single mode: skb, drv, or zc (zero-copy).

4-5: Preparatory patches to be able to specify a test to run. Need to
     define the test names in a single structure and their entry
     points, so we can use this when wanting to run a specific test.

6: Adds a command line option (-l) that lists all the tests.

7: Adds a command line option (-t) that runs a specific test instead
   of the whole test suite. Can be combined with -m to specify a
   single mode too.

8: Use ksft_print_msg() uniformly throughout the tests. It was a mix
   of printf() and ksft_print_msg() before.

9: In some places, we failed the whole test suite instead of a single
   test in certain circumstances. Fix this so only the test in
   question is failed and the rest of the test suite continues.

10: Display the available command line options with -h

v3 -> v4:
* Fixed another spelling error in patch #9 [Maciej]
* Only allow the actual strings for the -m command [Maciej]
* Move some code from patch #7 to #3 [Maciej]

v2 -> v3:
* Drop the support for environment variables. Probably not useful. [Maciej]
* Fixed spelling mistake in patch #9 [Maciej]
* Fail gracefully if unsupported mode is chosen [Maciej]
* Simplified test run loop [Maciej]

v1 -> v2:

* Introduce XSKTEST_MODE env variable to be able to set the mode to
  use [Przemyslaw]
* Introduce XSKTEST_ETH env variable to be able to set the ethernet
  interface to use by introducing a new patch (#11) [Magnus]
* Fixed spelling error in patch #5 [Przemyslaw, Maciej]
* Fixed confusing documentation in patch #10  [Przemyslaw]
* The -l option can now be used without being root [Magnus, Maciej]
* Fixed documentation error in patch #7 [Maciej]
* Added error handling to the -t option [Maciej]
* -h now displayed as an option [Maciej]

Thanks: Magnus
====================
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-1-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add the -h option to display all available command line options
available for test_xsk.sh and xskxceiver.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-11-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

In a number of places at en error, exit_with_error() is called that
terminates the whole test suite. This is not always desirable as it
would be more logical to only fail that test and then go along with
the other ones. So change this in a number of places in which I
thought it would be more logical to just fail the test in
question. Examples of this are in code that is only used by a single
test.

Also delete a pointless if-statement in receive_pkts() that has an
exit_with_error() in it. It can never occur since the return value is
an unsigned and the test is for less than zero.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-10-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Use ksft_print_msg() instead of printf() and fprintf() in all places
as the ksefltests framework is being used. There is only one exception
and that is for the list-of-tests print out option, since no tests are
run in that case.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-9-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add a command line option to be able to run a single test. This option
(-t) takes a number from the list of tests available with the "-l"
option. Here are two examples:

Run test number 2, the "receive single packet" test in all available modes:

./test_xsk.sh -t 2

Run test number 21, the metadata copy test in skb mode only

./test_xsh.sh -t 21 -m skb
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-8-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add a command line option (-l) that lists all the tests. The number
before the test will be used in the next commit for specifying a
single test to run. Here is an example of the output:

Tests:
0: SEND_RECEIVE
1: SEND_RECEIVE_2K_FRAME
2: SEND_RECEIVE_SINGLE_PKT
3: POLL_RX
4: POLL_TX
5: POLL_RXQ_FULL
6: POLL_TXQ_FULL
7: SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED
:
:
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-7-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Declare the test names statically in a struct so that we can refer to
them when adding the support to execute a single test in the next
commit. Before this patch, the names of them were not declared in a
single place which made it not possible to refer to them.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-6-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Prepare for the capability to be able to run a single test by moving
all the tests to their own functions. This function can then be called
to execute that test in the next commit.

Also, the tests named RUN_TO_COMPLETION_* were not named well, so
change them to SEND_RECEIVE_* as it is just a basic send and receive
test of 4K packets.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-5-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add an option -m on the command line that allows the user to run the
tests in a single mode instead of all of them. Valid modes are skb,
drv, and zc (zero-copy). An example:

To run test suite in drv mode only:

./test_xsk.sh -m drv
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-4-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add a timeout for the transmission thread. If packets are not
completed properly, for some reason, the test harness would previously
get stuck forever in a while loop. But with this patch, this timeout
will trigger, flag the test as a failure, and continue with the next
test.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-3-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Print info about every packet in verbose mode, both for Tx and
Rx. This is useful to have when a test fails or to validate that a
test is really doing what it was designed to do. Info on what is
supposed to be received and sent is also printed for the custom packet
streams since they differ from the base line. Here is an example:

Tx addr: 37e0 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 8
Tx addr: 4000 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 9
Rx: addr: 100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 0 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 1100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 1 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 2100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 4 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 3100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 8 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 4100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 9 valid: 1

One pointless verbose print statement is also deleted and another one
is made clearer.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-2-magnus.karlsson@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Commit a5e2151f ("net/ipv6: SKB symmetric hash should incorporate
transport ports") removed the use of FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_STOP_AT_FLOW_LABEL
in __skb_get_hash_symmetric(), making the doc out-of-date.
Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <qtian@vmware.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230911152353.8280-1-qtian@vmware.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

Leon Hwang says:

====================
bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop

This patch series fixes a tailcall infinite loop on x64.

From commit ebf7d1f5 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.

From commit e411901c ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.

From commit 5b92a28a ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.

How about combining them all together?

1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller.

As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt
the machine.

As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines.

How did I discover the bug?

From commit 7f6e4312 ("bpf: Limit caller's stack depth 256 for
subprogs with tailcalls"), the total stack size limits to around 8KiB.
Then, I write some bpf progs to validate the stack consuming, that are
tailcalls running in bpf2bpf and FENTRY/FEXIT tracing on bpf2bpf.

At that time, accidently, I made a tailcall loop. And then the loop halted
my VM. Without the loop, the bpf progs would consume over 8KiB stack size.
But the _stack-overflow_ did not halt my VM.

With bpf_printk(), I confirmed that the tailcall count limit did not work
expectedly. Next, read the code and fix it.

Thank Ilya Leoshkevich, this bug on s390x has been fixed.

Hopefully, this bug on arm64 will be fixed in near future.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Add 4 test cases to confirm the tailcall infinite loop bug has been fixed.

Like tailcall_bpf2bpf cases, do fentry/fexit on the bpf2bpf, and then
check the final count result.

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs -t tailcalls
226/13  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry:OK
226/14  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit:OK
226/15  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry_fexit:OK
226/16  tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry_entry:OK
226     tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/16 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-4-hffilwlqm@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

From commit ebf7d1f5 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.

From commit e411901c ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.

From commit 5b92a28a ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.

How about combining them all together?

1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller.

As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt
the machine.

As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines.

Fixes: ebf7d1f5 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Fixes: e411901c ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT")
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Without understanding emit_prologue(), it is really hard to figure out
where does tail_call_cnt come from, even though searching tail_call_cnt
in the whole kernel repo.

By adding these comments, it is a little bit easier to understand
tail_call_cnt initialisation.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Get and check data_fd. It should not check map_fd again.

Meanwhile, correct some 'return' to 'goto out'.

Thank the suggestion from Maciej in "bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite
loop"[0] discussions.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e496aef8-1f80-0f8e-dcdd-25a8c300319a@gmail.com/T/#m7d3b601066ba66400d436b7e7579b2df4a101033

Fixes: 79d49ba0 ("bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases")
Fixes: 3b037911 ("selftests/bpf: Add tailcall_bpf2bpf tests")
Fixes: 5e0b0a4c ("selftests/bpf: Test tail call counting with bpf2bpf and data on stack")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906154256.95461-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

This cast was made by purpose for older libbpf where the
bpf_object_skeleton field is void * instead of const void *
to eliminate a warning (as i understand
-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers) but this
cast introduces another warning (-Wcast-qual) for libbpf
where data field is const void *

It makes sense for bpftool to be in sync with libbpf from
kernel sources
Signed-off-by: Denys Zagorui <dzagorui@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230907090210.968612-1-dzagorui@cisco.com

Rong Tao says:

====================
We need to optimize the kallsyms cache, including optimizations for the
number of symbols limit, and, some test cases add new kernel symbols
(such as testmods) and we need to refresh kallsyms (reload or refresh).
====================
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

As Jirka said [0], we just need to make sure that global ksyms
initialization won't race.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZPCbAs3ItjRd8XVh@krava/Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/tencent_5D0A837E219E2CFDCB0495DAD7D5D1204407@qq.com