- 18 Apr, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] During my extent_map cleanup/refactor, with extra sanity checks, extent-map-tests::test_case_7() would not pass the checks. The problem is, after btrfs_drop_extent_map_range(), the resulted extent_map has a @block_start way too large. Meanwhile my btrfs_file_extent_item based members are returning a correct @disk_bytenr/@offset combination. The extent map layout looks like this: 0 16K 32K 48K | PINNED | | Regular | The regular em at [32K, 48K) also has 32K @block_start. Then drop range [0, 36K), which should shrink the regular one to be [36K, 48K). However the @block_start is incorrect, we expect 32K + 4K, but got 52K. [CAUSE] Inside btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() function, if we hit an extent_map that covers the target range but is still beyond it, we need to split that extent map into half: |<-- drop range -->| |<----- existing extent_map --->| And if the extent map is not compressed, we need to forward extent_map::block_start by the difference between the end of drop range and the extent map start. However in that particular case, the difference is calculated using (start + len - em->start). The problem is @start can be modified if the drop range covers any pinned extent. This leads to wrong calculation, and would be caught by my later extent_map sanity checks, which checks the em::block_start against btrfs_file_extent_item::disk_bytenr + btrfs_file_extent_item::offset. This is a regression caused by commit c962098c ("btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range"), which removed the @len update for pinned extents. [FIX] Fix it by avoiding using @start completely, and use @end - em->start instead, which @end is exclusive bytenr number. And update the test case to verify the @block_start to prevent such problem from happening. Thankfully this is not going to lead to any data corruption, as IO path does not utilize btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() with @skip_pinned set. So this fix is only here for the sake of consistency/correctness. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+ Fixes: c962098c ("btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Syzbot reported the following information leak for in btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino(): BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_user+0xbc/0x110 lib/usercopy.c:40 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] _copy_to_user+0xbc/0x110 lib/usercopy.c:40 copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:191 [inline] btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x440/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3499 btrfs_ioctl+0x714/0x1260 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x261/0x450 fs/ioctl.c:890 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:890 x64_sys_call+0x1883/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:17 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was created at: __kmalloc_large_node+0x231/0x370 mm/slub.c:3921 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3954 [inline] __kmalloc_node+0xb07/0x1060 mm/slub.c:3973 kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:648 [inline] kvmalloc_node+0xc0/0x2d0 mm/util.c:634 kvmalloc include/linux/slab.h:766 [inline] init_data_container+0x49/0x1e0 fs/btrfs/backref.c:2779 btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x17c/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3480 btrfs_ioctl+0x714/0x1260 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x261/0x450 fs/ioctl.c:890 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:890 x64_sys_call+0x1883/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:17 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Bytes 40-65535 of 65536 are uninitialized Memory access of size 65536 starts at ffff888045a40000 This happens, because we're copying a 'struct btrfs_data_container' back to user-space. This btrfs_data_container is allocated in 'init_data_container()' via kvmalloc(), which does not zero-fill the memory. Fix this by using kvzalloc() which zeroes out the memory on allocation. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reported-by: <syzbot+510a1abbb8116eeb341d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 17 Apr, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Sweet Tea Dorminy authored
In commit b4ccace8 ("btrfs: refactor submit_compressed_extents()"), if an async extent compressed but failed to find enough space, we changed from falling back to an uncompressed write to just failing the write altogether. The principle was that if there's not enough space to write the compressed version of the data, there can't possibly be enough space to write the larger, uncompressed version of the data. However, this isn't necessarily true: due to fragmentation, there could be enough discontiguous free blocks to write the uncompressed version, but not enough contiguous free blocks to write the smaller but unsplittable compressed version. This has occurred to an internal workload which relied on write()'s return value indicating there was space. While rare, it has happened a few times. Thus, in order to prevent early ENOSPC, re-add a fallback to uncompressed writing. Fixes: b4ccace8 ("btrfs: refactor submit_compressed_extents()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Co-developed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev> Signed-off-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Naohiro Aota authored
When btrfs scrub finds an error, it reads mirrors to find correct data. If all the errors are fixed, sctx->error_bitmap is cleared for the stripe range. However, in the zoned mode, it runs relocation to repair scrub errors when the bitmap is *not* empty, which is a flipped condition. Also, it runs the relocation even if the scrub is read-only. This was missed by a fix in commit 1f2030ff ("btrfs: scrub: respect the read-only flag during repair"). The repair is only necessary when there is a repaired sector and should be done on read-write scrub. So, tweak the condition for both regular and zoned case. Fixes: 54765392 ("btrfs: scrub: introduce helper to queue a stripe for scrub") Fixes: 1f2030ff ("btrfs: scrub: respect the read-only flag during repair") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
The message format in syslog is usually made of two parts: prefix ":" message Various tools parse the prefix up to the first ":". When there's an additional status of a btrfs filesystem like [5.199782] BTRFS info (device nvme1n1p1: state M): use zstd compression, level 9 where 'M' is for remount, there's one more ":" that does not conform to the format. Remove it. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 09 Apr, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There is a recent report that when memory pressure is high (including cached pages), btrfs can spend most of its time on memory allocation in btrfs_alloc_page_array() for compressed read/write. [CAUSE] For btrfs_alloc_page_array() we always go alloc_pages_bulk_array(), and even if the bulk allocation failed (fell back to single page allocation) we still retry but with extra memalloc_retry_wait(). If the bulk alloc only returned one page a time, we would spend a lot of time on the retry wait. The behavior was introduced in commit 395cb57e ("btrfs: wait between incomplete batch memory allocations"). [FIX] Although the commit mentioned that other filesystems do the wait, it's not the case at least nowadays. All the mainlined filesystems only call memalloc_retry_wait() if they failed to allocate any page (not only for bulk allocation). If there is any progress, they won't call memalloc_retry_wait() at all. For example, xfs_buf_alloc_pages() would only call memalloc_retry_wait() if there is no allocation progress at all, and the call is not for metadata readahead. So I don't believe we should call memalloc_retry_wait() unconditionally for short allocation. Call memalloc_retry_wait() if it fails to allocate any page for tree block allocation (which goes with __GFP_NOFAIL and may not need the special handling anyway), and reduce the latency for btrfs_alloc_page_array(). Reported-by: Julian Taylor <julian.taylor@1und1.de> Tested-by: Julian Taylor <julian.taylor@1und1.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8966c095-cbe7-4d22-9784-a647d1bf27c3@1und1.de/ Fixes: 395cb57e ("btrfs: wait between incomplete batch memory allocations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Add an ASSERT to catch a faulty delayed reference item resulting from prematurely cleared extent buffer. Also, add a WARN to detect if we try to dirty a ZEROOUT buffer again, which is suspicious as its update will be lost. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Naohiro Aota authored
Btrfs clears the content of an extent buffer marked as EXTENT_BUFFER_ZONED_ZEROOUT before the bio submission. This mechanism is introduced to prevent a write hole of an extent buffer, which is once allocated, marked dirty, but turns out unnecessary and cleaned up within one transaction operation. Currently, btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty() marks the extent buffer as EXTENT_BUFFER_ZONED_ZEROOUT, and skips the entry function. If this call happens while the buffer is under IO (with the WRITEBACK flag set, without the DIRTY flag), we can add the ZEROOUT flag and clear the buffer's content just before a bio submission. As a result: 1) it can lead to adding faulty delayed reference item which leads to a FS corrupted (EUCLEAN) error, and 2) it writes out cleared tree node on disk The former issue is previously discussed in [1]. The corruption happens when it runs a delayed reference update. So, on-disk data is safe. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/3f4f2a0ff1a6c818050434288925bdcf3cd719e5.1709124777.git.naohiro.aota@wdc.com/ The latter one can reach on-disk data. But, as that node is already processed by btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty(), that will be invalidated in the next transaction commit anyway. So, the chance of hitting the corruption is relatively small. Anyway, we should skip flagging ZEROOUT on a non-DIRTY extent buffer, to keep the content under IO intact. Fixes: aa6313e6 ("btrfs: zoned: don't clear dirty flag of extent buffer") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.8 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/oadvdekkturysgfgi4qzuemd57zudeasynswurjxw3ocdfsef6@sjyufeugh63f/Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 02 Apr, 2024 6 commits
-
-
Boris Burkov authored
It is possible to clear a root's IN_TRANS tag from the radix tree, but not clear its PERTRANS, if there is some error in between. Eliminate that possibility by moving the free up to where we clear the tag. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Boris Burkov authored
Currently, this call site in btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() only converts the reservation. We are marking it not delalloc, so I don't think it makes sense to keep the rsv around. This is a path where we are not sure to join a transaction, so it leads to incorrect free-ing during umount. Helps with the pass rate of generic/269 and generic/475. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Boris Burkov authored
The transaction is only able to free PERTRANS reservations for a root once that root has been recorded with the TRANS tag on the roots radix tree. Therefore, until we are sure that this root will get tagged, it isn't safe to convert. Generally, this is not an issue as *some* transaction will likely tag the root before long and this reservation will get freed in that transaction, but technically it could stick around until unmount and result in a warning about leaked metadata reservation space. This path is most exercised by running the generic/269 fstest with CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG. Fixes: a6496849 ("btrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Boris Burkov authored
When running delayed inode updates, we do not record the inode's root in the transaction, but we do allocate PREALLOC and thus converted PERTRANS space for it. To be sure we free that PERTRANS meta rsv, we must ensure that we record the root in the transaction. Fixes: 4f5427cc ("btrfs: delayed-inode: Use new qgroup meta rsv for delayed inode and item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Boris Burkov authored
Create subvolume, create snapshot and delete subvolume all use btrfs_subvolume_reserve_metadata() to reserve metadata for the changes done to the parent subvolume's fs tree, which cannot be mediated in the normal way via start_transaction. When quota groups (squota or qgroups) are enabled, this reserves qgroup metadata of type PREALLOC. Once the operation is associated to a transaction, we convert PREALLOC to PERTRANS, which gets cleared in bulk at the end of the transaction. However, the error paths of these three operations were not implementing this lifecycle correctly. They unconditionally converted the PREALLOC to PERTRANS in a generic cleanup step regardless of errors or whether the operation was fully associated to a transaction or not. This resulted in error paths occasionally converting this rsv to PERTRANS without calling record_root_in_trans successfully, which meant that unless that root got recorded in the transaction by some other thread, the end of the transaction would not free that root's PERTRANS, leaking it. Ultimately, this resulted in hitting a WARN in CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG builds at unmount for the leaked reservation. The fix is to ensure that every qgroup PREALLOC reservation observes the following properties: 1. any failure before record_root_in_trans is called successfully results in freeing the PREALLOC reservation. 2. after record_root_in_trans, we convert to PERTRANS, and now the transaction owns freeing the reservation. This patch enforces those properties on the three operations. Without it, generic/269 with squotas enabled at mkfs time would fail in ~5-10 runs on my system. With this patch, it ran successfully 1000 times in a row. Fixes: e85fde51 ("btrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup meta rsv leak for subvolume operations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Boris Burkov authored
We use add_root_meta_rsv and sub_root_meta_rsv to track prealloc and pertrans reservations for subvolumes when quotas are enabled. The convert function does not properly increment pertrans after decrementing prealloc, so the count is not accurate. Note: we check that the fs is not read-only to mirror the logic in qgroup_convert_meta, which checks that before adding to the pertrans rsv. Fixes: 8287475a ("btrfs: qgroup: Use root::qgroup_meta_rsv_* to record qgroup meta reserved space") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 26 Mar, 2024 9 commits
-
-
Tavian Barnes authored
There are reports from tree-checker that detects corrupted nodes, without any obvious pattern so possibly an overwrite in memory. After some debugging it turns out there's a race when reading an extent buffer the uptodate status can be missed. To prevent concurrent reads for the same extent buffer, read_extent_buffer_pages() performs these checks: /* (1) */ if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags)) return 0; /* (2) */ if (test_and_set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags)) goto done; At this point, it seems safe to start the actual read operation. Once that completes, end_bbio_meta_read() does /* (3) */ set_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb); /* (4) */ clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags); Normally, this is enough to ensure only one read happens, and all other callers wait for it to finish before returning. Unfortunately, there is a racey interleaving: Thread A | Thread B | Thread C ---------+----------+--------- (1) | | | (1) | (2) | | (3) | | (4) | | | (2) | | | (1) When this happens, thread B kicks of an unnecessary read. Worse, thread C will see UPTODATE set and return immediately, while the read from thread B is still in progress. This race could result in tree-checker errors like this as the extent buffer is concurrently modified: BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256 block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356 expect [256, 18446744073709551360] Fix it by testing UPTODATE again after setting the READING bit, and if it's been set, skip the unnecessary read. Fixes: d7172f52 ("btrfs: use per-buffer locking for extent_buffer reading") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHk-=whNdMaN9ntZ47XRKP6DBes2E5w7fi-0U3H2+PS18p+Pzw@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/f51a6d5d7432455a6a858d51b49ecac183e0bbc9.1706312914.git.wqu@suse.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c7241ea4-fcc6-48d2-98c8-b5ea790d6c89@gmx.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Tavian Barnes <tavianator@tavianator.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor update of changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Anand Jain authored
When attempting to exclusive open a device which has no exclusive open permission, such as a physical device associated with the flakey dm device, the open operation will fail, resulting in a mount failure. In this particular scenario, we erroneously return -EINVAL instead of the correct error code provided by the bdev_open_by_path() function, which is -EBUSY. Fix this, by returning error code from the bdev_open_by_path() function. With this correction, the mount error message will align with that of ext4 and xfs. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Commit f4a9f219 ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") changed the behaviour of deleting unused block-groups on zoned filesystems. Starting with this commit, we're using btrfs_space_info_used() to calculate the number of used bytes in a space_info. But btrfs_space_info_used() also accounts btrfs_space_info::bytes_zone_unusable as used bytes. So if a block group is 100% zone_unusable it is skipped from the deletion step. In order not to skip fully zone_unusable block-groups, also check if the block-group has bytes left that can be used on a zoned filesystem. Fixes: f4a9f219 ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
At btrfs_add_extent_mapping(), if we failed to merge the extent map, which is unexpected and theoretically should never happen, we use WARN_ONCE() to log a message which is not great because we don't get information about which filesystem it relates to in case we have multiple btrfs filesystems mounted. So change this to use btrfs_warn() and surround the error check with WARN_ON() so we always get a useful stack trace and the condition is flagged as "unlikely" since it's not expected to ever happen. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
At btrfs_add_extent_mapping(), if we are unable to merge the existing extent map, we print a warning message that suggests interval ranges in the form "[X, Y)", where the first element is the inclusive start offset of a range and the second element is the exclusive end offset. However we end up printing the length of the ranges instead of the exclusive end offsets. So fix this by printing the range end offsets. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
At unpin_extent_range() we print warning messages that are supposed to print an interval in the form "[X, Y)", with the first element being an inclusive start offset and the second element being the exclusive end offset of a range. However we end up printing the range's length instead of the range's exclusive end offset, so fix that to avoid having confusing and non-sense messages in case we hit one of these unexpected scenarios. Fixes: 00deaf04 ("btrfs: log messages at unpin_extent_range() during unexpected cases") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
At unpin_extent_cache() if we happen to find an extent map with an unexpected start offset, we jump to the 'out' label and never release the reference we added to the extent map through the call to lookup_extent_mapping(), therefore resulting in a leak. So fix this by moving the free_extent_map() under the 'out' label. Fixes: c03c89f8 ("btrfs: handle errors returned from unpin_extent_cache()") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Anand Jain authored
Boris managed to create a device capable of changing its maj:min without altering its device path. Only multi-devices can be scanned. A device that gets scanned and remains in the btrfs kernel cache might end up with an incorrect maj:min. Despite the temp-fsid feature patch did not introduce this bug, it could lead to issues if the above multi-device is converted to a single device with a stale maj:min. Subsequently, attempting to mount the same device with the correct maj:min might mistake it for another device with the same fsid, potentially resulting in wrongly auto-enabling the temp-fsid feature. To address this, this patch validates the device's maj:min at the time of device open and updates it if it has changed since the last scan. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.7+ Fixes: a5b8a5f9 ("btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability") Reported-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Co-developed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io># Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Shinichiro reported the following use-after-free triggered by the device replace operation in fstests btrfs/070. BTRFS info (device nullb1): scrub: finished on devid 1 with status: 0 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in do_zone_finish+0x91a/0xb90 [btrfs] Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881543c8060 by task btrfs-cleaner/3494007 CPU: 0 PID: 3494007 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc5-kts #1 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPi-TF, BIOS 3.3 02/21/2020 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90 print_report+0xcf/0x670 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x200/0x3e0 kasan_report+0xd8/0x110 ? do_zone_finish+0x91a/0xb90 [btrfs] ? do_zone_finish+0x91a/0xb90 [btrfs] do_zone_finish+0x91a/0xb90 [btrfs] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x5e1/0x1750 [btrfs] ? __pfx_btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] ? btrfs_put_root+0x2d/0x220 [btrfs] ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x299/0x430 [btrfs] cleaner_kthread+0x21e/0x380 [btrfs] ? __pfx_cleaner_kthread+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] kthread+0x2e3/0x3c0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 3493983: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 btrfs_alloc_device+0xb3/0x4e0 [btrfs] device_list_add.constprop.0+0x993/0x1630 [btrfs] btrfs_scan_one_device+0x219/0x3d0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0x26e/0x310 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x99/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 Freed by task 3494056: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x3f/0x60 poison_slab_object+0x102/0x170 __kasan_slab_free+0x32/0x70 kfree+0x11b/0x320 btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev+0xca/0x280 [btrfs] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0xd7e/0x14f0 [btrfs] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0x1286/0x25a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xb27/0x57d0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x99/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881543c8000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 The buggy address is located 96 bytes inside of freed 1024-byte region [ffff8881543c8000, ffff8881543c8400) The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page:00000000fe2c1285 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1543c8 head:00000000fe2c1285 order:3 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0 flags: 0x17ffffc0000840(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) page_type: 0xffffffff() raw: 0017ffffc0000840 ffff888100042dc0 ffffea0019e8f200 dead000000000002 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff8881543c7f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8881543c7f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff8881543c8000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ^ ffff8881543c8080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff8881543c8100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb This UAF happens because we're accessing stale zone information of a already removed btrfs_device in do_zone_finish(). The sequence of events is as follows: btrfs_dev_replace_start btrfs_scrub_dev btrfs_dev_replace_finishing btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree <-- devices replaced btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev btrfs_free_device <-- device freed cleaner_kthread btrfs_delete_unused_bgs btrfs_zone_finish do_zone_finish <-- refers the freed device The reason for this is that we're using a cached pointer to the chunk_map from the block group, but on device replace this cached pointer can contain stale device entries. The staleness comes from the fact, that btrfs_block_group::physical_map is not a pointer to a btrfs_chunk_map but a memory copy of it. Also take the fs_info::dev_replace::rwsem to prevent btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree() from changing the device underneath us again. Note: btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree() is holding fs_info::mapping_tree_lock, but as this is a spinning read/write lock we cannot take it as the call to blkdev_zone_mgmt() requires a memory allocation which may not sleep. But btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree() is always called with the fs_info::dev_replace::rwsem held in write mode. Many thanks to Shinichiro for analyzing the bug. Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.8 Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 15 Mar, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
At the moment scrub_supers() doesn't grab the super block's location via the zoned device aware btrfs_sb_log_location() but via btrfs_sb_offset(). This leads to checksum errors on 'scrub' as we're not accessing the correct location of the super block. So use btrfs_sb_log_location() for getting the super blocks location on scrub. Reported-by: WA AM <waautomata@gmail.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CANU2Z0EvUzfYxczLgGUiREoMndE9WdQnbaawV5Fv5gNXptPUKw@mail.gmail.com CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 05 Mar, 2024 15 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
During fiemap we may have to visit multiple leaves of the subvolume's inode tree, and each time we are freeing and allocating an extent buffer to use as a clone of each visited leaf. Optimize this by reusing cloned extent buffers, to avoid the freeing and re-allocation both of the extent buffer structure itself and more importantly of the pages attached to the extent buffer. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc). This however introduced a race that makes us miss delalloc ranges for file regions that are currently holes, so the caller of fiemap will not be aware that there's data for some file regions. This can be quite serious for some use cases - for example in coreutils versions before 9.0, the cp program used fiemap to detect holes and data in the source file, copying only regions with data (extents or delalloc) from the source file to the destination file in order to preserve holes (see the documentation for its --sparse command line option). This means that if cp was used with a source file that had delalloc in a hole, the destination file could end up without that data, which is effectively a data loss issue, if it happened to hit the race described below. The race happens like this: 1) Fiemap is called, without the FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC flag, for a file that has delalloc in the file range [64M, 65M[, which is currently a hole; 2) Fiemap locks the inode in shared mode, then starts iterating the inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items, without having the whole fiemap target range locked in the inode's io tree - the change introduced recently by commit b0ad381f ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking"). It only locks ranges in the io tree when it finds a hole or prealloc extent since that commit; 3) Note that fiemap clones each leaf before using it, and this is to avoid deadlocks when locking a file range in the inode's io tree and the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to some file, because writing to the page with btrfs_page_mkwrite() will wait on any ordered extent for the page's range and the ordered extent needs to lock the range and may need to modify the same leaf, therefore leading to a deadlock on the leaf; 4) While iterating the file extent items in the cloned leaf before finding the hole in the range [64M, 65M[, the delalloc in that range is flushed and its ordered extent completes - meaning the corresponding file extent item is in the inode's subvolume tree, but not present in the cloned leaf that fiemap is iterating over; 5) When fiemap finds the hole in the [64M, 65M[ range by seeing the gap in the cloned leaf (or a file extent item with disk_bytenr == 0 in case the NO_HOLES feature is not enabled), it will lock that file range in the inode's io tree and then search for delalloc by checking for the EXTENT_DELALLOC bit in the io tree for that range and ordered extents (with btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range()). But it finds nothing since the delalloc in that range was already flushed and the ordered extent completed and is gone - as a result fiemap will not report that there's delalloc or an extent for the range [64M, 65M[, so user space will be mislead into thinking that there's a hole in that range. This could actually be sporadically triggered with test case generic/094 from fstests, which reports a missing extent/delalloc range like this: generic/094 2s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad) --- tests/generic/094.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.830519425 +0100 +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad 2024-02-28 11:00:00.381071525 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ QA output created by 094 fiemap run with sync fiemap run without sync +ERROR: couldn't find extent at 7 +map is 'HHDDHPPDPHPH' +logical: [ 5.. 6] phys: 301517.. 301518 flags: 0x800 tot: 2 +logical: [ 8.. 8] phys: 301520.. 301520 flags: 0x800 tot: 1 ... (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/094.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad' to see the entire diff) So in order to fix this, while still avoiding deadlocks in the case where the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file, change fiemap to work like the following: 1) Always lock the whole range in the inode's io tree before starting to iterate the inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items, just like we did before commit b0ad381f ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking"); 2) Now instead of writing to the fiemap buffer every time we have an extent to report, write instead to a temporary buffer (1 page), and when that buffer becomes full, stop iterating the file extent items, unlock the range in the io tree, release the search path, submit all the entries kept in that buffer to the fiemap buffer, and then resume the search for file extent items after locking again the remainder of the range in the io tree. The buffer having a size of a page, allows for 146 entries in a system with 4K pages. This is a large enough value to have a good performance by avoiding too many restarts of the search for file extent items. In other words this preserves the huge performance gains made in the last two years to fiemap, while avoiding the deadlocks in case the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file (useless in practice, but possible and exercised by fuzz testing and syzbot). Fixes: b0ad381f ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
At contains_pending_extent() the value of the end offset of a chunk we found in the device's allocation state io tree is inclusive, so when we calculate the length we pass to the in_range() macro, we must sum 1 to the expression "physical_end - physical_offset". In practice the wrong calculation should be harmless as chunks sizes are never 1 byte and we should never have 1 byte ranges of unallocated space. Nevertheless fix the wrong calculation. Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.lyakas@zadara.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAOcd+r30e-f4R-5x-S7sV22RJPe7+pgwherA6xqN2_qe7o4XTg@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 1c11b63e ("btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently "btrfs subvolume snapshot -i <qgroupid>" would always mark the qgroup inconsistent. This can be annoying if the fs has a lot of snapshots, and needs qgroup to get the accounting for the amount of bytes it can free for each snapshot. Although we have the new simple quote as a solution, there is also a case where we can skip the full scan, if all the following conditions are met: - The source subvolume belongs to a higher level parent qgroup - The parent qgroup already owns all its bytes exclusively - The new snapshot is also added to the same parent qgroup In that case, we only need to add nodesize to the parent qgroup and avoid a full rescan. This patch would add the extra quick accounting update for such inherit. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] Currently btrfs can create subvolume with an invalid qgroup inherit without triggering any error: # mkfs.btrfs -O quota -f $dev # mount $dev $mnt # btrfs subvolume create -i 2/0 $mnt/subv1 # btrfs qgroup show -prce --sync $mnt Qgroupid Referenced Exclusive Path -------- ---------- --------- ---- 0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB <toplevel> 0/256 16.00KiB 16.00KiB subv1 [CAUSE] We only do a very basic size check for btrfs_qgroup_inherit structure, but never really verify if the values are correct. Thus in btrfs_qgroup_inherit() function, we have to skip non-existing qgroups, and never return any error. [FIX] Fix the behavior and introduce extra checks: - Introduce early check for btrfs_qgroup_inherit structure Not only the size, but also all the qgroup ids would be verified. And the timing is very early, so we can return error early. This early check is very important for snapshot creation, as snapshot is delayed to transaction commit. - Drop support for btrfs_qgroup_inherit::num_ref_copies and num_excl_copies Those two members are used to specify to copy refr/excl numbers from other qgroups. This would definitely mark qgroup inconsistent, and btrfs-progs has dropped the support for them for a long time. It's time to drop the support for kernel. - Verify the supported btrfs_qgroup_inherit::flags Just in case we want to add extra flags for btrfs_qgroup_inherit. Now above subvolume creation would fail with -ENOENT other than silently ignore the non-existing qgroup. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.7+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Anand Jain authored
To better debug issues surrounding device scans, include the device's major and minor numbers in the device scan notice for btrfs. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Lijuan Li authored
btrfs_put_caching_control() is only used in block-group.c, so mark it static. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Lijuan Li <lilijuan@iscas.ac.cn> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Chengming Zhou authored
The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag used to be implemented in SLAB, which was removed as of v6.8-rc1, so it became a dead flag since the commit 16a1d968 ("mm/slab: remove mm/slab.c and slab_def.h"). And the series[1] went on to mark it obsolete to avoid confusion for users. Here we can just remove all its users, which has no functional change. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240223-slab-cleanup-flags-v2-1-02f1753e8303@suse.cz/Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] If qgroup is marked inconsistent (e.g. caused by operations needing full subtree rescan, like creating a snapshot and assign to a higher level qgroup), btrfs would immediately start leaking its data reserved space. The following script can easily reproduce it: mkfs.btrfs -O quota -f $dev mount $dev $mnt btrfs subvolume create $mnt/subv1 btrfs qgroup create 1/0 $mnt # This snapshot creation would mark qgroup inconsistent, # as the ownership involves different higher level qgroup, thus # we have to rescan both source and snapshot, which can be very # time consuming, thus here btrfs just choose to mark qgroup # inconsistent, and let users to determine when to do the rescan. btrfs subv snapshot -i 1/0 $mnt/subv1 $mnt/snap1 # Now this write would lead to qgroup rsv leak. xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64k" $mnt/file1 # And at unmount time, btrfs would report 64K DATA rsv space leaked. umount $mnt And we would have the following dmesg output for the unmount: BTRFS info (device dm-1): last unmount of filesystem 14a3d84e-f47b-4f72-b053-a8a36eef74d3 BTRFS warning (device dm-1): qgroup 0/5 has unreleased space, type 0 rsv 65536 [CAUSE] Since commit e15e9f43 ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting"), we introduce a mode for btrfs qgroup to skip the timing consuming backref walk, if the qgroup is already inconsistent. But this skip also covered the data reserved freeing, thus the qgroup reserved space for each newly created data extent would not be freed, thus cause the leakage. [FIX] Make the data extent reserved space freeing mandatory. The qgroup reserved space handling is way cheaper compared to the backref walking part, and we always have the super sensitive leak detector, thus it's definitely worth to always free the qgroup reserved data space. Reported-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com> Fixes: e15e9f43 ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216196Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There is a bug report about very suspicious tree-checker got triggered: BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256 block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356 expect [256, 18446744073709551360] BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256 block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356 expect [256, 18446744073709551360] BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256 block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356 expect [256, 18446744073709551360] SELinux: inode_doinit_use_xattr: getxattr returned 117 for dev=dm-0 ino=5737268 [ANALYZE] The root cause is still unclear, but there are some clues already: - Unaligned eb bytenr The block bytenr is 8550954455682405139, which is not even aligned to 2. This bytenr is fetched from extent buffer header, not from eb->start. This means, at the initial time of read, eb header bytenr is still correct (the very basis check to continue read), but later something wrong happened, got at least the first page corrupted. Thus we got such obviously incorrect value. - Invalid extent buffer header owner The read itself is triggered for subvolume 256, but the eb header owner is 11858205567642294356, which is not really possible. The problem here is, subvolume id is limited to (1 << 48 - 1), and this one definitely goes beyond that limit. So this value is another garbage. We already got two garbage from an extent buffer, which passed the initial bytenr and csum checks, but later the contents become garbage at some point. This looks like a page lifespan problem (e.g. we didn't properly hold the page). [ENHANCEMENT] The current tree-checker only outputs things from the extent buffer, nothing with the page status. So this patch would enhance the tree-checker output by also dumping the first page, which would look like this: page:00000000aa9f3ce8 refcount:4 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000169aa6b6 index:0x1d0c pfn:0x1022e5 memcg:ffff888103456000 aops:btree_aops [btrfs] ino:1 flags: 0x2ffff0000008000(private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xffff) page_type: 0xffffffff() raw: 02ffff0000008000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 ffff88811e06e220 raw: 0000000000001d0c ffff888102fdb1d8 00000004ffffffff ffff888103456000 page dumped because: eb page dump BTRFS critical (device dm-3): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=30457856 slot=6 ino=257 file_offset=0, invalid disk_bytenr for file extent, have 10617606235235216665, should be aligned to 4096 BTRFS error (device dm-3): read time tree block corruption detected on logical 30457856 mirror 1 From the dump we can see some extra info, something can help us to do extra cross-checks: - Page refcount if it's too low, it definitely means something bad. - Page aops Any mapped eb page should have btree_aops with inode number 1. - Page index Since a mapped eb page should has its bytenr matching the page position, (index << PAGE_SHIFT) should match the bytenr of the bytenr from the critical line. - Page Private flags A mapped eb page should have Private flag set to indicate it's managed by btrfs. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHk-=whNdMaN9ntZ47XRKP6DBes2E5w7fi-0U3H2+PS18p+Pzw@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since commit a440d48c ("Btrfs: heuristic: implement sampling logic"), btrfs_compress_heuristic() is no longer a simple "return true", but more complex to determine if we should compress. Thus the comment is dead and can be confusing, just remove it. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For the writer counter, it's pretty much the same as the reader counter, and they are exclusive. So move them to the new locked bitmap. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Currently btrfs_subpage utilizes its atomic member @reader to manage the reader counter. However it is only utilized to prevent the page to be released/unlocked when we still have reads underway. In that use case, we don't really allow multiple readers on the same subpage sector. So here we can introduce a new locked bitmap to represent exactly which subpage range is locked for read. In theory we can remove btrfs_subpage::reader as it's just the set bits of the new locked bitmap. But unfortunately bitmap doesn't provide such handy API yet, so we still keep the reader counter. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Both functions were introduced in commit 1e1de387 ("btrfs: make process_one_page() to handle subpage locking"), but they have never been utilized out of subpage code. So just unexport them. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
We can pass a valid em cache pointer down to __get_extent_map() and drop the validity check. This avoids the special case, the call stacks are simple: btrfs_read_folio btrfs_do_readpage __get_extent_map extent_readahead contiguous_readpages btrfs_do_readpage __get_extent_map Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 04 Mar, 2024 1 commit
-
-
David Sterba authored
The helpers btrfs_del_delalloc_inode() and __btrfs_del_delalloc_inode() don't follow the pattern when the "__" helper does a special case and are in fact reversed regarding the naming. We can merge them into one as there's only one place that needs to be open coded. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-