-
unknown authored
NAME_CONST('whatever', -1) * MAX(whatever) bombed since -1 was not seen as constant, but as FUNCTION_UNARY_MINUS(constant) while we are at the same time pretending it was a basic const item. This confused the aggregate handlers in exciting ways. We now make NAME_CONST() behave more consistently. mysql-test/r/func_misc.result: show that a combination of NAME_CONST('x', -y) and an aggregate no longer crashes the server. mysql-test/t/func_misc.test: show that a combination of NAME_CONST('x', -y) and an aggregate no longer crashes the server. sql/ha_ndbcluster_cond.cc: tell cluster about "new" function type NEG_FUNC. (this was previous identified as UNKNOWN_FUNC, so we just handle it the same way, that's all.) sql/ha_ndbcluster_cond.h: tell cluster about "new" function type NEG_FUNC. (this was previous identified as UNKNOWN_FUNC, so we just handle it the same way, that's all.) sql/item.cc: make NAME_CONST() transparent in that type() of -constant is that of constant, not that of unary minus (id est, FUNC_ITEM). sql/item.h: Move constructor to item.cc sql/item_func.h: Revert Bug#30832; we can apply the magic more narrowly (just for NAME_CONST() rather than all Item_func_neg). Introduce new function type "NEG_FUNC."
a0eec8ab