-
Davi Arnaut authored
The problem is that a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE statement might open a table and later wait for a impeding global read lock without noticing whether it is holding a table that is being waited upon the the flush phase of the process that took the global read lock. The same problem also affected the following statements: LOCK TABLES .. WRITE UPDATE .. SET (update and multi-table update) TRUNCATE TABLE .. LOAD DATA .. The solution is to make the above statements wait for a impending global read lock before opening the tables. If there is no impending global read lock, the statement raises a temporary protection against global read locks and progresses smoothly towards completion. Important notice: the patch does not try to address all possible cases, only those which are common and can be fixed unintrusively enough for 5.0.
aebaf079