using TPC-B):
 
Problem: A RBR event can contain incomplete row data (only key value and
fields which have been changed). In that case, when the row is unpacked
into record and written to a table, the missing fields get incorrect NULL
values leading to master-slave inconsistency.
 
Solution: Use values found in slave's table for columns which are not given
in the rows event. The code for writing a single row uses the following 
algorithm: 

1. unpack row_data into table->record[0],
2. try to insert record,
3. if duplicate record found, fetch it into table->record[0],
4. unpack row_data into table->record[0],
5. write table->record[0] into the table.

Where row_data is the row as stored in the data area of a rows event. 
Thus:

a) unpacking of row_data happens at the time when row is written into 
 a table,

b) when unpacking (in step 4), only columns present in row_data are 
 overwritten - all other columns remain as they were found in the table.
 
Since all data needed for the above algorithm is stored inside 
Rows_log_event class, functions which locate and write rows are turned 
into methods of that class.

replace_record()     -> Rows_log_event::write_row()
find_and_fetch_row() -> Rows_log_event::find_row()

Both methods take row data from event's data buffer - the row being 
processed is pointed by m_curr_row. They unpack the data as needed into 
table's record buffers record[0] or record[1]. When row is unpacked, 
m_curr_row_end is set to point at next row in the data buffer.

Other changes introduced in this changeset:

- Change signature of unpack_row(): don't report errors and don't
setup table's rw_set here. Errors can happen only when setting default 
values in prepare_record() function and are detected there.
 
- In Rows_log_event and derived classes, don't pass arguments to
the execution primitives (do_...() member functions) but use class
members instead.

- Move old row handling code into log_event_old.cc to be used by 
*_rows_log_event_old classes.

Also, a new test rpl_ndb_2other is added which tests basic replication 
from master using ndb tables to slave storing the same tables using 
(possibly) different engine (myisam,innodb).
  
Test is based on existing tests rpl_ndb_2myisam and rpl_ndb_2innodb. 
However, these tests doesn't work for various reasons and currently are 
disabled (see BUG#19227).
  
The new test differs from the ones it is based on as follows:
  
1. Single test tests replication with different storage engines on slave 
(myisam, innodb, ndb).
  
2. Include file extra/rpl_tests/rpl_ndb_2multi_eng.test containing 
original tests is replaced by extra/rpl_tests/rpl_ndb_2multi_basic.test 
which doesn't contain tests using partitioned tables as these don't work 
currently. Instead, it tests replication to a slave which has more or 
less columns than master.
  
3. Include file include/rpl_multi_engine3.inc is replaced with 
include/rpl_multi_engine2.inc. The later differs by performing slightly 
different operations (updating more than one row in the table) and 
clearing table with "TRUNCATE TABLE" statement instead of "DELETE FROM" 
as replication of "DELETE" doesn't work well in this setting.
  
4. Slave must use option --log-slave-updates=0 as otherwise execution of 
replication events generated by ndb fails if table uses a different 
storage engine on slave (see BUG#29569).