Bug#14400 - Query joins wrong rows from table which is

            subject of "concurrent insert"
Better fix by Monty: "The previous bug fix didn't work
when using partial keys."
parent 97562d74
...@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ int mi_rkey(MI_INFO *info, byte *buf, int inx, const byte *key, uint key_len, ...@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ int mi_rkey(MI_INFO *info, byte *buf, int inx, const byte *key, uint key_len,
if (fast_mi_readinfo(info)) if (fast_mi_readinfo(info))
goto err; goto err;
if (share->concurrent_insert) if (share->concurrent_insert)
rw_rdlock(&share->key_root_lock[inx]); rw_rdlock(&share->key_root_lock[inx]);
...@@ -77,19 +78,37 @@ int mi_rkey(MI_INFO *info, byte *buf, int inx, const byte *key, uint key_len, ...@@ -77,19 +78,37 @@ int mi_rkey(MI_INFO *info, byte *buf, int inx, const byte *key, uint key_len,
if (!_mi_search(info,keyinfo, key_buff, use_key_length, if (!_mi_search(info,keyinfo, key_buff, use_key_length,
myisam_read_vec[search_flag], info->s->state.key_root[inx])) myisam_read_vec[search_flag], info->s->state.key_root[inx]))
{ {
while (info->lastpos >= info->state->data_file_length) if (info->lastpos >= info->state->data_file_length)
{ {
/* do
Skip rows that are inserted by other threads since we got a lock {
Note that this can only happen if we are not searching after an uint not_used;
exact key, because the keys are sorted according to position /*
*/ If we are searching for an exact key, abort if we find a bigger
key.
if (_mi_search_next(info, keyinfo, info->lastkey, */
info->lastkey_length, if (search_flag == HA_READ_KEY_EXACT &&
myisam_readnext_vec[search_flag], (use_key_length == USE_WHOLE_KEY ||
info->s->state.key_root[inx])) _mi_key_cmp(keyinfo->seg, key_buff, info->lastkey, use_key_length,
break; SEARCH_FIND, &not_used)))
{
my_errno= HA_ERR_END_OF_FILE;
info->lastpos= HA_OFFSET_ERROR;
break;
}
/*
Skip rows that are inserted by other threads since we got a lock
Note that this can only happen if we are not searching after an
full length exact key, because the keys are sorted
according to position
*/
if (_mi_search_next(info, keyinfo, info->lastkey,
info->lastkey_length,
myisam_readnext_vec[search_flag],
info->s->state.key_root[inx]))
break;
}
while (info->lastpos >= info->state->data_file_length);
} }
} }
if (share->concurrent_insert) if (share->concurrent_insert)
......
...@@ -472,3 +472,18 @@ select c1 from t1 order by c1 limit 1; ...@@ -472,3 +472,18 @@ select c1 from t1 order by c1 limit 1;
c1 c1
a a
drop table t1; drop table t1;
create table t1 (a int not null, primary key(a));
create table t2 (a int not null, b int not null, primary key(a,b));
insert into t1 values (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6);
insert into t2 values (1,1),(2,1);
lock tables t1 read local, t2 read local;
select straight_join * from t1,t2 force index (primary) where t1.a=t2.a;
a a b
1 1 1
2 2 1
insert into t2 values(2,0);
select straight_join * from t1,t2 force index (primary) where t1.a=t2.a;
a a b
1 1 1
2 2 1
drop table t1,t2;
...@@ -458,3 +458,20 @@ insert into t1 values ('a'), ('b'); ...@@ -458,3 +458,20 @@ insert into t1 values ('a'), ('b');
select c1 from t1 order by c1 limit 1; select c1 from t1 order by c1 limit 1;
drop table t1; drop table t1;
#
# Bug #14400 Join could miss concurrently inserted row
#
create table t1 (a int not null, primary key(a));
create table t2 (a int not null, b int not null, primary key(a,b));
insert into t1 values (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6);
insert into t2 values (1,1),(2,1);
lock tables t1 read local, t2 read local;
select straight_join * from t1,t2 force index (primary) where t1.a=t2.a;
connect (root,localhost,root,,test,$MASTER_MYPORT,master.sock);
insert into t2 values(2,0);
disconnect root;
connection default;
select straight_join * from t1,t2 force index (primary) where t1.a=t2.a;
drop table t1,t2;
# end of 4.0 tests
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment