Commit 33313992 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Comment adjusted (see fix for #13545)

parent 3c5ae70e
......@@ -2987,11 +2987,10 @@ find_field_in_table_ref(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list,
Check that the table and database that qualify the current field name
are the same as the table reference we are going to search for the field.
We exclude from the test below NATURAL/USING joins and any nested join
because each column in such
joins may potentially originate from a different table. However, base
tables and views that are under some NATURAL/USING join are searched
as usual base tables/views.
Exclude from the test below nested joins because the columns in a
nested join generally originate from different tables. Nested joins
also have no table name, except when a nested join is a merge view
or an information schema table.
We include explicitly table references with a 'field_translation' table,
because if there are views over natural joins we don't want to search
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment