Commit 3b11e4f8 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Fixed LP bug #609121

Post-review fix - avoid re-evaluation of the having clause
when it evaluates to true.
parent a09e5f50
......@@ -12652,9 +12652,12 @@ do_select(JOIN *join,List<Item> *fields,TABLE *table,Procedure *procedure)
}
else if (join->send_row_on_empty_set())
{
List<Item> *columns_list= (procedure ? &join->procedure_fields_list :
fields);
rc= join->result->send_data(*columns_list);
if (!join->having || join->having->val_int())
{
List<Item> *columns_list= (procedure ? &join->procedure_fields_list :
fields);
rc= join->result->send_data(*columns_list);
}
}
}
else
......
......@@ -1722,8 +1722,7 @@ public:
bool send_row_on_empty_set()
{
return (do_send_rows && tmp_table_param.sum_func_count != 0 &&
!group_list && having_value != Item::COND_FALSE &&
(!having || having->val_int()));
!group_list && having_value != Item::COND_FALSE);
}
bool change_result(select_result *result);
bool is_top_level_join() const
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment