BUG#46130 Slave does not correctly handle "expected errors"
In STATEMENT based replication, a statement that failed on the master but that updated non-transactional tables is written to binary log with the error code appended to it. On the slave, the statement is executed and the same error is expected. However, when an "expected error" did not happen on the slave and was either ignored or was related to a concurrency issue on the master, the slave did not rollback the effects of the statement and as such inconsistencies might happen. To fix the problem, we automatically rollback a statement that should have failed on a slave but succeded and whose expected failure is either ignored or stems from a concurrency issue on the master.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment