Commit a5ec6953 authored by Mattias Jonsson's avatar Mattias Jonsson

Bug#40595: Non-matching rows not released with READ-COMMITTED

on tables with partitions

Problem was that the handler function try_semi_consistent_read
was not propagated to the innodb handler.

Solution was to implement that function in the partitioning
handler.

mysql-test/r/partition_innodb.result:
  Bug#40595: Non-matching rows not released with READ-COMMITTED
  on tables with partitions
  
  Updated test result.
mysql-test/t/partition_innodb.test:
  Bug#40595: Non-matching rows not released with READ-COMMITTED
  on tables with partitions
  
  Added test case for bug#40595.
  
  Note: the replace_regex is taking long time. I have not found
  any better regex (it takes time using 'sed' too).
sql/ha_partition.cc:
  Bug#40595: Non-matching rows not released with READ-COMMITTED
  on tables with partitions
  
  Added function to the partitioning handler for handling
  semi consistent reads (unlock_row was already implemented,
  and this is needed for unlock_row to work properly in innodb).
  It uses pruning for optimizing the call.
sql/ha_partition.h:
  Bug#40595: Non-matching rows not released with READ-COMMITTED
  on tables with partitions
  
  Added function to the partitioning handler for handling
  semi consistent reads (unlock_row was already implemented,
  and this is needed for unlock_row to work properly in innodb).
parent 9a063775
drop table if exists t1;
CREATE TABLE t1 (id INT PRIMARY KEY, data INT) ENGINE = InnoDB
PARTITION BY RANGE(id) (
PARTITION p0 VALUES LESS THAN (5),
PARTITION p1 VALUES LESS THAN (10),
PARTITION p2 VALUES LESS THAN MAXVALUE
);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5), (6,6), (7,7), (8,8),
(9,9), (10,10), (11,11);
SET @old_tx_isolation := @@session.tx_isolation;
SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;
SET autocommit = 0;
UPDATE t1 SET DATA = data*2 WHERE id = 3;
SHOW ENGINE InnoDB STATUS;
Type Name Status
InnoDB 2 lock struct(s) 1 row lock(s)
UPDATE t1 SET data = data*2 WHERE data = 2;
SHOW ENGINE InnoDB STATUS;
Type Name Status
InnoDB 6 lock struct(s) 2 row lock(s)
SET @@session.tx_isolation = @old_tx_isolation;
DROP TABLE t1;
# Bug#37721, test of ORDER BY on PK and WHERE on INDEX
CREATE TABLE t1 (
a INT,
......
--source include/have_partition.inc
--source include/have_innodb.inc
--disable_warnings
drop table if exists t1;
--enable_warnings
#
# Bug#40595: Non-matching rows not released with READ-COMMITTED on tables
# with partitions
CREATE TABLE t1 (id INT PRIMARY KEY, data INT) ENGINE = InnoDB
PARTITION BY RANGE(id) (
PARTITION p0 VALUES LESS THAN (5),
PARTITION p1 VALUES LESS THAN (10),
PARTITION p2 VALUES LESS THAN MAXVALUE
);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5), (6,6), (7,7), (8,8),
(9,9), (10,10), (11,11);
SET @old_tx_isolation := @@session.tx_isolation;
SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;
SET autocommit = 0;
UPDATE t1 SET DATA = data*2 WHERE id = 3;
# NOTE: This regex takes quite a long time (> 1 sec).
--replace_regex /.*[^[:alnum:]]+([0-9]+ lock struct.s.), heap size [0-9]+, ([0-9]+ row lock.s.), undo log entries .*/\1 \2/
SHOW ENGINE InnoDB STATUS;
UPDATE t1 SET data = data*2 WHERE data = 2;
# NOTE: This regex takes quite a long time (> 1 sec).
--replace_regex /.*[^[:alnum:]]+([0-9]+ lock struct.s.), heap size [0-9]+, ([0-9]+ row lock.s.), undo log entries .*/\1 \2/
SHOW ENGINE InnoDB STATUS;
SET @@session.tx_isolation = @old_tx_isolation;
DROP TABLE t1;
#
# Bug37721: ORDER BY when WHERE contains non-partitioned index column
# wrong order since it did not use pk as second compare
......
......@@ -2813,8 +2813,42 @@ uint ha_partition::lock_count() const
void ha_partition::unlock_row()
{
DBUG_ENTER("ha_partition::unlock_row");
m_file[m_last_part]->unlock_row();
return;
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
/**
Use semi consistent read if possible
SYNOPSIS
try_semi_consistent_read()
yes Turn on semi consistent read
RETURN VALUE
NONE
DESCRIPTION
See handler.h:
Tell the engine whether it should avoid unnecessary lock waits.
If yes, in an UPDATE or DELETE, if the row under the cursor was locked
by another transaction, the engine may try an optimistic read of
the last committed row value under the cursor.
Note: prune_partitions are already called before this call, so using
pruning is OK.
*/
void ha_partition::try_semi_consistent_read(bool yes)
{
handler **file;
DBUG_ENTER("ha_partition::try_semi_consistent_read");
for (file= m_file; *file; file++)
{
if (bitmap_is_set(&(m_part_info->used_partitions), (file - m_file)))
(*file)->try_semi_consistent_read(yes);
}
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
......
......@@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ public:
Call to unlock rows not to be updated in transaction
*/
virtual void unlock_row();
/*
Call to hint about semi consistent read
*/
virtual void try_semi_consistent_read(bool);
/*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment