Commit a6733b52 authored by Jon Olav Hauglid's avatar Jon Olav Hauglid

Bug #47682 strange behaviour of INSERT DELAYED

The problem was a "self-deadlock" if the connection issuing INSERT DELAYED
had both the global read lock (FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK) and LOCK TABLES
mode active. The table being inserted into had to be different from the 
table(s) locked by LOCK TABLES.

For INSERT DELAYED, the connection thread waits until the handler thread has
opened and locked its table before returning. But since the global read lock
was active, the handler thread would be unable to lock and would wait for the
global read lock to go away.

So the handler thread would be waiting for the connection thread to release
the global read lock while the connection thread was waiting for the handler
thread to lock the table. This gave a "self-deadlock" (same connection,
different threads).

The deadlock would only happen if we also had LOCK TABLES mode since the
INSERT otherwise will try to get protection against global read lock before
starting the handler thread. It will then notice that the global read lock
is owned by the same connection and report ER_CANT_UPDATE_WITH_READLOCK.

This patch removes the deadlock by reporting ER_CANT_UPDATE_WITH_READLOCK
also if we are inside LOCK TABLES mode.

Test case added to delayed.test.
parent 33025aba
...@@ -310,4 +310,16 @@ a b ...@@ -310,4 +310,16 @@ a b
2 2 2 2
drop table t1; drop table t1;
set global low_priority_updates = @old_delayed_updates; set global low_priority_updates = @old_delayed_updates;
#
# Bug #47682 strange behaviour of INSERT DELAYED
#
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1, t2;
CREATE TABLE t1 (f1 integer);
CREATE TABLE t2 (f1 integer);
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
LOCK TABLES t1 READ;
INSERT DELAYED INTO t2 VALUES (1);
ERROR HY000: Can't execute the query because you have a conflicting read lock
UNLOCK TABLES;
DROP TABLE t1, t2;
End of 5.1 tests End of 5.1 tests
...@@ -328,4 +328,26 @@ drop table t1; ...@@ -328,4 +328,26 @@ drop table t1;
set global low_priority_updates = @old_delayed_updates; set global low_priority_updates = @old_delayed_updates;
--echo #
--echo # Bug #47682 strange behaviour of INSERT DELAYED
--echo #
--disable_warnings
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1, t2;
--enable_warnings
CREATE TABLE t1 (f1 integer);
CREATE TABLE t2 (f1 integer);
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
LOCK TABLES t1 READ;
--error ER_CANT_UPDATE_WITH_READLOCK
INSERT DELAYED INTO t2 VALUES (1);
UNLOCK TABLES;
DROP TABLE t1, t2;
--echo End of 5.1 tests --echo End of 5.1 tests
...@@ -500,6 +500,22 @@ bool open_and_lock_for_insert_delayed(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list) ...@@ -500,6 +500,22 @@ bool open_and_lock_for_insert_delayed(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list)
DBUG_ENTER("open_and_lock_for_insert_delayed"); DBUG_ENTER("open_and_lock_for_insert_delayed");
#ifndef EMBEDDED_LIBRARY #ifndef EMBEDDED_LIBRARY
if (thd->locked_tables && thd->global_read_lock)
{
/*
If this connection has the global read lock, the handler thread
will not be able to lock the table. It will wait for the global
read lock to go away, but this will never happen since the
connection thread will be stuck waiting for the handler thread
to open and lock the table.
If we are not in locked tables mode, INSERT will seek protection
against the global read lock (and fail), thus we will only get
to this point in locked tables mode.
*/
my_error(ER_CANT_UPDATE_WITH_READLOCK, MYF(0));
DBUG_RETURN(TRUE);
}
if (delayed_get_table(thd, table_list)) if (delayed_get_table(thd, table_list))
DBUG_RETURN(TRUE); DBUG_RETURN(TRUE);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment