Commit b894c47d authored by dlenev@mysql.com's avatar dlenev@mysql.com

Clean up in implementation of f_is_geom()/f_is_bitfield()/f_is_enum()

macros.

It does not fixes any bugs in 4.0. But it prevents from future error in
any bugfixes that may use these macros. Also after merging into 4.1 tree
this cleanup will fix bug #7884 "Able to add invalid unique index on
TIMESTAMP prefix".
parent 2600fb3b
......@@ -1101,10 +1101,10 @@ bool test_if_int(const char *str,int length);
#define FIELDFLAG_NUMBER 2
#define FIELDFLAG_ZEROFILL 4
#define FIELDFLAG_PACK 120 // Bits used for packing
#define FIELDFLAG_INTERVAL 256
#define FIELDFLAG_BITFIELD 512 // mangled with dec!
#define FIELDFLAG_BLOB 1024 // mangled with dec!
#define FIELDFLAG_GEOM 2048
#define FIELDFLAG_INTERVAL 256 // mangled with decimals!
#define FIELDFLAG_BITFIELD 512 // mangled with decimals!
#define FIELDFLAG_BLOB 1024 // mangled with decimals!
#define FIELDFLAG_GEOM 2048 // mangled with decimals!
#define FIELDFLAG_LEFT_FULLSCREEN 8192
#define FIELDFLAG_RIGHT_FULLSCREEN 16384
#define FIELDFLAG_FORMAT_NUMBER 16384 // predit: ###,,## in output
......@@ -1128,10 +1128,10 @@ bool test_if_int(const char *str,int length);
#define f_decimals(x) ((uint8) (((x) >> FIELDFLAG_DEC_SHIFT) & FIELDFLAG_MAX_DEC))
#define f_is_alpha(x) (!f_is_num(x))
#define f_is_binary(x) ((x) & FIELDFLAG_BINARY)
#define f_is_enum(x) ((x) & FIELDFLAG_INTERVAL)
#define f_is_bitfield(x) ((x) & FIELDFLAG_BITFIELD)
#define f_is_enum(x) (((x) & (FIELDFLAG_INTERVAL | FIELDFLAG_NUMBER)) == FIELDFLAG_INTERVAL)
#define f_is_bitfield(x) (((x) & (FIELDFLAG_BITFIELD | FIELDFLAG_NUMBER)) == FIELDFLAG_BITFIELD)
#define f_is_blob(x) (((x) & (FIELDFLAG_BLOB | FIELDFLAG_NUMBER)) == FIELDFLAG_BLOB)
#define f_is_geom(x) ((x) & FIELDFLAG_GEOM)
#define f_is_geom(x) (((x) & (FIELDFLAG_GEOM | FIELDFLAG_NUMBER)) == FIELDFLAG_GEOM)
#define f_is_equ(x) ((x) & (1+2+FIELDFLAG_PACK+31*256))
#define f_settype(x) (((int) x) << FIELDFLAG_PACK_SHIFT)
#define f_maybe_null(x) (x & FIELDFLAG_MAYBE_NULL)
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment