Bug#17047208 REPLICATION DIFFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE TRIGGERS
Problem & Analysis: If DML invokes a trigger or a stored function that inserts into an AUTO_INCREMENT column, that DML has to be marked as 'unsafe' statement. If the tables are locked in the transaction prior to DML statement (using LOCK TABLES), then the same statement is not marked as 'unsafe' statement. The logic of checking whether unsafeness is protected with if (!thd->locked_tables_mode). Hence if we lock the tables prior to DML statement, it is *not* entering into this if condition. Hence the statement is not marked as unsafe statement. Fix: Irrespective of locked_tables_mode value, the unsafeness check should be done. Now with this patch, the code is moved out to 'decide_logging_format()' function where all these checks are happening and also with out 'if(!thd->locked_tables_mode)'. Along with the specified test case in the bug scenario (BINLOG_STMT_UNSAFE_AUTOINC_COLUMNS), we also identified that other cases BINLOG_STMT_UNSAFE_AUTOINC_NOT_FIRST, BINLOG_STMT_UNSAFE_WRITE_AUTOINC_SELECT, BINLOG_STMT_UNSAFE_INSERT_TWO_KEYS are also protected with thd->locked_tables_mode which is not right. All of those checks also moved to 'decide_logging_format()' function.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment