Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
M
mariadb
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
mariadb
Commits
e36cda4b
Commit
e36cda4b
authored
Jan 03, 2002
by
monty@hundin.mysql.fi
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Plain Diff
Merge work:/home/bk/mysql-4.0 into hundin.mysql.fi:/my/bk/mysql-4.0
parents
308d0398
a9de2c14
Changes
4
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
4 changed files
with
66 additions
and
51 deletions
+66
-51
Docs/manual.texi
Docs/manual.texi
+35
-31
sql/item_timefunc.cc
sql/item_timefunc.cc
+1
-1
sql/sql_cache.cc
sql/sql_cache.cc
+29
-18
sql/sql_cache.h
sql/sql_cache.h
+1
-1
No files found.
Docs/manual.texi
View file @
e36cda4b
...
...
@@ -4744,22 +4744,23 @@ MySQL Server offers the following advantages over PostgreSQL:
@itemize @bullet
@item
@code{MySQL} Server is generally much faster than PostgreSQL.
@code{MySQL} Server is generally much faster than PostgreSQL. MySQL
4.0.1 has also a query cache that can boost up the query speed for
mostly-read-only sites many times.
@item
MySQL has a much larger user base than PostgreSQL, therefore the
code is more tested and has historically proven more stable than
PostgreSQL. MySQL Server is the much more used in production
environments than PostgreSQL, mostly thanks to that MySQL AB,
formerly TCX DataKonsult AB, has provided top quality commercial support
for MySQL Server from the day it was released, whereas until recently
PostgreSQL was unsupported.
MySQL has a much larger user base than PostgreSQL, therefore the code is
more tested and has historically proven more stable than PostgreSQL.
MySQL Server is more used in production environments than PostgreSQL,
mostly thanks to that MySQL AB, formerly TCX DataKonsult AB, has
provided top quality commercial support for MySQL Server from the day it
was released, whereas until recently PostgreSQL was unsupported.
@item
MySQL Server works better on Windows than PostgreSQL does. MySQL Server
runs as a
native Windows application (a service on NT/Win2000/WinXP), while
PostgreSQL is run under the @code{Cygwin} emulation. We have heard
that PostgreSQL is not yet that stable on Windows but we haven't
MySQL Server works better on Windows than PostgreSQL does. MySQL Server
runs as a native Windows application (a service on NT/Win2000/WinXP),
while PostgreSQL is run under the @code{Cygwin} emulation. We have
heard
that PostgreSQL is not yet that stable on Windows but we haven't
been able to verify this ourselves.
@item
...
...
@@ -4844,19 +4845,21 @@ You can access many databases from the same connection (depending of course
on your privileges).
@item
MySQL Server is coded from the start to be multi-threaded while PostgreSQL uses
processes. Context switching and access to common storage areas is much
faster between threads than between separate processes, this gives MySQL Server
a big speed advantage in multi-user applications and also makes it easier
for MySQL Server to take full advantage of symmetric multiprocessor (SMP) systems.
MySQL Server is coded from the start to be multi-threaded while
PostgreSQL uses processes. Context switching and access to common
storage areas is much faster between threads than between separate
processes, this gives MySQL Server a big speed advantage in multi-user
applications and also makes it easier for MySQL Server to take full
advantage of symmetric multiprocessor (SMP) systems.
@item
MySQL Server has a much more sophisticated privilege system than PostgreSQL.
While PostgreSQL only supports @code{INSERT}, @code{SELECT}, and
@code{UPDATE/DELETE} grants per user on a database or a table, MySQL Server allows
you to define a full set of different privileges on database, table and
column level. MySQL Server also allows you to specify the privilege on host and
user combinations. @xref{GRANT}.
MySQL Server has a much more sophisticated privilege system than
PostgreSQL. While PostgreSQL only supports @code{INSERT},
@code{SELECT}, and @code{UPDATE/DELETE} grants per user on a database or
a table, MySQL Server allows you to define a full set of different
privileges on database, table and column level. MySQL Server also
allows you to specify the privilege on host and user combinations.
@xref{GRANT}.
@item
MySQL Server supports a compressed client/server protocol which improves
...
...
@@ -4880,16 +4883,17 @@ of a data file happens, usually from a hardware failure. It allows a
majority of the data to be recovered.
@item
Upgrading MySQL Server is painless. When you are upgrading MySQL Server, you don't need
to dump/restore your data, as you have to do with most PostgreSQL upgrades.
Upgrading MySQL Server is painless. When you are upgrading MySQL
Server, you don't need to dump/restore your data, as you have to do with
most PostgreSQL upgrades.
@end itemize
Drawbacks with MySQL Server compared to PostgreSQL:
@itemize @bullet
@item
The transaction support in MySQL Server is not yet as well tested as
PostgreSQL's
system.
The transaction support in MySQL Server is not yet as well tested as
PostgreSQL's
system.
@item
Because MySQL Server uses threads, which are not yet flawless on many OSes, one
...
...
@@ -4914,10 +4918,10 @@ as in PostgreSQL. @xref{Adding functions}.
@item
Updates that run over multiple tables is harder to do in MySQL Server.
This will, however, be fixed in MySQL Server 4.0
with multi-table @code{UPDATE}
and in MySQL Server 4.1 with subselects.
In MySQL Server 4.0 one can use multi-table deletes to delete from many tables
at the
same time. @xref{DELETE}.
This will, however, be fixed in MySQL Server 4.0
.2 with multi-table
@code{UPDATE} and in MySQL Server 4.1 with subselects. In MySQL Server
4.0 one can use multi-table deletes to delete from many tables at the
same time. @xref{DELETE}.
@end itemize
PostgreSQL currently offers the following advantages over MySQL Server:
sql/item_timefunc.cc
View file @
e36cda4b
...
...
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ longlong Item_extract::val_int()
void
Item_typecast
::
print
(
String
*
str
)
{
str
->
append
(
"CAS
E
("
);
str
->
append
(
"CAS
T
("
);
args
[
0
]
->
print
(
str
);
str
->
append
(
" AS "
);
str
->
append
(
func_name
());
...
...
sql/sql_cache.cc
View file @
e36cda4b
...
...
@@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ inline Query_cache_block * Query_cache_block_table::block()
void
Query_cache_block
::
init
(
ulong
block_length
)
{
DBUG_ENTER
(
"Query_cache_block::init"
);
DBUG_PRINT
(
"qcache"
,
(
"init block 0x%lx"
,
(
ulong
)
this
));
DBUG_PRINT
(
"qcache"
,
(
"init block 0x%lx length: %lu"
,
(
ulong
)
this
,
block_length
));
length
=
block_length
;
used
=
0
;
type
=
Query_cache_block
::
FREE
;
...
...
@@ -587,7 +588,7 @@ void query_cache_insert(NET *net, const char *packet, ulong length)
}
else
STRUCT_UNLOCK
(
&
query_cache
.
structure_guard_mutex
);
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(););
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(
0
););
DBUG_VOID_RETURN
;
}
...
...
@@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ void query_cache_abort(NET *net)
}
net
->
query_cache_query
=
0
;
STRUCT_UNLOCK
(
&
query_cache
.
structure_guard_mutex
);
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(););
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(
0
););
}
DBUG_VOID_RETURN
;
}
...
...
@@ -662,7 +663,7 @@ void query_cache_end_of_result(NET *net)
STRUCT_UNLOCK
(
&
query_cache
.
structure_guard_mutex
);
}
net
->
query_cache_query
=
0
;
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(););
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(
0
););
}
DBUG_VOID_RETURN
;
}
...
...
@@ -670,7 +671,7 @@ void query_cache_end_of_result(NET *net)
void
query_cache_invalidate_by_MyISAM_filename
(
const
char
*
filename
)
{
query_cache
.
invalidate_by_MyISAM_filename
(
filename
);
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(););
DBUG_EXECUTE
(
"check_querycache"
,
query_cache
.
check_integrity
(
0
););
}
...
...
@@ -2482,6 +2483,7 @@ my_bool Query_cache::move_by_type(byte **border,
*
pprev
=
block
->
pprev
,
*
pnext
=
block
->
pnext
,
*
new_block
=
(
Query_cache_block
*
)
*
border
;
uint
tablename_offset
=
block
->
table
()
->
table
()
-
block
->
table
()
->
db
();
char
*
data
=
(
char
*
)
block
->
data
();
byte
*
key
;
uint
key_length
;
...
...
@@ -2493,7 +2495,7 @@ my_bool Query_cache::move_by_type(byte **border,
new_block
->
type
=
Query_cache_block
::
TABLE
;
new_block
->
used
=
used
;
new_block
->
n_tables
=
1
;
mem
cpy
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
data
(),
data
,
len
-
new_block
->
headers_len
());
mem
move
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
data
(),
data
,
len
-
new_block
->
headers_len
());
relink
(
block
,
new_block
,
next
,
prev
,
pnext
,
pprev
);
if
(
tables_blocks
[
new_block
->
table
()
->
type
()]
==
block
)
tables_blocks
[
new_block
->
table
()
->
type
()]
=
new_block
;
...
...
@@ -2515,10 +2517,18 @@ my_bool Query_cache::move_by_type(byte **border,
nlist_root
->
prev
=
tnext
;
tprev
->
next
=
nlist_root
;
}
/*
Go through all queries that uses this table and change them to
point to the new table object
*/
Query_cache_table
*
new_block_table
=
new_block
->
table
();
for
(;
tnext
!=
nlist_root
;
tnext
=
tnext
->
next
)
tnext
->
parent
=
new_block
->
table
()
;
tnext
->
parent
=
new_block_table
;
*
border
+=
len
;
*
before
=
new_block
;
/* Fix pointer to table name */
new_block
->
table
()
->
table
(
new_block
->
table
()
->
db
()
+
tablename_offset
);
/* Fix hash to point at moved block */
hash_replace
(
&
tables
,
tables
.
current_record
,
(
byte
*
)
new_block
);
...
...
@@ -2546,8 +2556,8 @@ my_bool Query_cache::move_by_type(byte **border,
uint
key_length
;
key
=
query_cache_query_get_key
((
byte
*
)
block
,
&
key_length
,
0
);
hash_search
(
&
queries
,
(
byte
*
)
key
,
key_length
);
mem
cpy
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
table
(
0
),
(
char
*
)
block
->
table
(
0
),
// Move table of used tables
mem
move
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
table
(
0
),
(
char
*
)
block
->
table
(
0
),
ALIGN_SIZE
(
n_tables
*
sizeof
(
Query_cache_block_table
)));
block
->
query
()
->
unlock_n_destroy
();
block
->
destroy
();
...
...
@@ -2555,7 +2565,7 @@ my_bool Query_cache::move_by_type(byte **border,
new_block
->
type
=
Query_cache_block
::
QUERY
;
new_block
->
used
=
used
;
new_block
->
n_tables
=
n_tables
;
mem
cpy
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
data
(),
data
,
len
-
new_block
->
headers_len
());
mem
move
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
data
(),
data
,
len
-
new_block
->
headers_len
());
relink
(
block
,
new_block
,
next
,
prev
,
pnext
,
pprev
);
if
(
queries_blocks
==
block
)
queries_blocks
=
new_block
;
...
...
@@ -2620,7 +2630,7 @@ my_bool Query_cache::move_by_type(byte **border,
new_block
->
init
(
len
);
new_block
->
type
=
type
;
new_block
->
used
=
used
;
mem
cpy
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
data
(),
data
,
len
-
new_block
->
headers_len
());
mem
move
((
char
*
)
new_block
->
data
(),
data
,
len
-
new_block
->
headers_len
());
relink
(
block
,
new_block
,
next
,
prev
,
pnext
,
pprev
);
new_block
->
result
()
->
parent
(
query_block
);
Query_cache_query
*
query
=
query_block
->
query
();
...
...
@@ -2786,7 +2796,7 @@ void bins_dump() {}
void
cache_dump
()
{}
void
queries_dump
()
{}
void
tables_dump
()
{}
my_bool
check_integrity
()
{
return
0
;
}
my_bool
check_integrity
(
bool
not_locked
)
{
return
0
;
}
my_bool
in_list
(
Query_cache_block
*
root
,
Query_cache_block
*
point
,
const
char
*
name
)
{
return
0
;}
my_bool
in_blocks
(
Query_cache_block
*
point
)
{
return
0
;
}
...
...
@@ -2806,7 +2816,7 @@ void Query_cache::wreck(uint line, const char *message)
if
(
thd
)
thd
->
killed
=
1
;
cache_dump
();
/* check_integrity(); */
/* Can't call it here because of locks */
/* check_integrity(
0
); */
/* Can't call it here because of locks */
bins_dump
();
DBUG_VOID_RETURN
;
}
...
...
@@ -2977,19 +2987,19 @@ void Query_cache::tables_dump()
}
my_bool
Query_cache
::
check_integrity
()
my_bool
Query_cache
::
check_integrity
(
bool
not_locked
)
{
my_bool
result
=
0
;
uint
i
;
STRUCT_LOCK
(
&
structure_guard_mutex
);
DBUG_ENTER
(
"check_integrity"
);
if
(
!
initialized
)
if
(
!
initialized
)
{
STRUCT_UNLOCK
(
&
structure_guard_mutex
);
DBUG_PRINT
(
"qcache"
,
(
"Query Cache not initialized"
));
DBUG_RETURN
(
0
);
}
if
(
!
not_locked
)
STRUCT_LOCK
(
&
structure_guard_mutex
);
if
(
hash_check
(
&
queries
))
{
...
...
@@ -3213,7 +3223,8 @@ my_bool Query_cache::check_integrity()
}
}
DBUG_ASSERT
(
result
==
0
);
STRUCT_UNLOCK
(
&
structure_guard_mutex
);
if
(
!
not_locked
)
STRUCT_UNLOCK
(
&
structure_guard_mutex
);
DBUG_RETURN
(
result
);
}
...
...
sql/sql_cache.h
View file @
e36cda4b
...
...
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ protected:
void
cache_dump
();
void
queries_dump
();
void
tables_dump
();
my_bool
check_integrity
();
my_bool
check_integrity
(
bool
not_locked
);
my_bool
in_list
(
Query_cache_block
*
root
,
Query_cache_block
*
point
,
const
char
*
name
);
my_bool
in_blocks
(
Query_cache_block
*
point
);
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment