Bug#20327: Marking of a wrong field leads to a wrong result on select with view,
prepared statement and subquery. When a field of a view from an outer select is resolved the find_field_in_view function creates an Item_direct_view_ref object that references the corresponding view underlying field. After that the view_ref is marked as a dependent one. While resolving view underlying field it also get marked as a dependent one due to current_select still points to the subselect. Marking the view underlying field is wrong and lead to attaching conditions to a wrong table and thus to the wrong result of the whole statement. Now mark_select_range_as_dependent() function isn't called for fields from a view underlying table.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment