MDEV-3928: Assertion `example' failed in Item_cache::is_expensive_processor...
MDEV-3928: Assertion `example' failed in Item_cache::is_expensive_processor with a 2-level IN subquery Analysis: The following call stack shows that it is possible to set Item_cache::value_cached, and the relevant value without setting Item_cache::example. #0 Item_cache_temporal::store_packed at item.cc:8395 #1 get_datetime_value at item_cmpfunc.cc:915 #2 resolve_const_item at item.cc:7987 #3 propagate_cond_constants at sql_select.cc:12264 #4 propagate_cond_constants at sql_select.cc:12227 #5 optimize_cond at sql_select.cc:13026 #6 JOIN::optimize at sql_select.cc:1016 #7 st_select_lex::optimize_unflattened_subqueries at sql_lex.cc:3161 #8 JOIN::optimize_unflattened_subqueries at opt_subselect.cc:4880 #9 JOIN::optimize at sql_select.cc:1554 The fix is to set Item_cache_temporal::example even when the value is set directly by Item_cache_temporal::store_packed. This makes the Item_cache_temporal object consistent.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment