BUG#21077: 4.1->5.0 merge

mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result

@@ -83,6 +83,27 @@ b	a
 3	3
 3	3
 DROP TABLE t1, t2, t3;
+CREATE TABLE `t1` (`id1` INT) ;
+INSERT INTO `t1` (`id1`) VALUES (1),(5),(2);
+CREATE TABLE `t2` (
+`id1` INT,
+`id2` INT NOT NULL,
+`id3` INT,
+`id4` INT NOT NULL,
+UNIQUE (`id2`,`id4`),
+KEY (`id1`)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB;
+INSERT INTO `t2`(`id1`,`id2`,`id3`,`id4`) VALUES 
+(1,1,1,0),
+(1,1,2,1),
+(5,1,2,2),
+(6,1,2,3),
+(1,2,2,2),
+(1,2,1,1);
+SELECT `id1` FROM `t1` WHERE `id1` NOT IN (SELECT `id1` FROM `t2` WHERE `id2` = 1 AND `id3` = 2);
+id1
+2
+DROP TABLE t1, t2;
 create table t1m (a int) engine=myisam;
 create table t1i (a int) engine=innodb;
 create table t2m (a int) engine=myisam;

mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test

@@ -90,6 +90,33 @@ SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN SQL_NO_CACHE t1.b, t1.a FROM t1, t3, t2 WHERE
   t3.a = t2.a AND t2.b = t1.a AND t3.b = 1 AND t3.c IN (1, 2) 
   ORDER BY t1.b LIMIT 5;
 DROP TABLE t1, t2, t3;
+
+
+# BUG#21077 (The testcase is not deterministic so correct execution doesn't
+# prove anything) For proof one should track if sequence of ha_innodb::* func
+# calls is correct.
+CREATE TABLE `t1` (`id1` INT) ;
+INSERT INTO `t1` (`id1`) VALUES (1),(5),(2);
+
+CREATE TABLE `t2` (
+  `id1` INT,
+  `id2` INT NOT NULL,
+  `id3` INT,
+  `id4` INT NOT NULL,
+  UNIQUE (`id2`,`id4`),
+  KEY (`id1`)
+) ENGINE=InnoDB;
+
+INSERT INTO `t2`(`id1`,`id2`,`id3`,`id4`) VALUES 
+(1,1,1,0),
+(1,1,2,1),
+(5,1,2,2),
+(6,1,2,3),
+(1,2,2,2),
+(1,2,1,1);
+
+SELECT `id1` FROM `t1` WHERE `id1` NOT IN (SELECT `id1` FROM `t2` WHERE `id2` = 1 AND `id3` = 2);
+DROP TABLE t1, t2;
 #
 # Bug #12882  	min/max inconsistent on empty table
 #