Commit f7a47e13 authored by Alexander Barkov's avatar Alexander Barkov

Merge from 5.3

parents ed899ec8 13dc299a
......@@ -637,3 +637,32 @@ Note 1003 select min(`test`.`t1`.`f10`) AS `field1` from `test`.`t1` where <expr
set optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch;
drop table t1,t2,t3;
End of 5.2 tests
#
# Bug mdev-6116: an equality in the conjunction of HAVING
# and IN subquery in WHERE
# (The bug is caused by the same problem as bug mdev-5927)
#
CREATE TABLE t1 (f_key varchar(1), f_nokey varchar(1), INDEX(f_key));
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES ('v','v'),('s','s');
CREATE TABLE t2 (f_int int, f_key varchar(1), INDEX(f_key));
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES
(4,'j'),(6,'v'),(3,'c'),(5,'m'),(3,'d'),(2,'d'),(2,'y'),
(9,'t'),(3,'d'),(8,'s'),(1,'r'),(8,'m'),(8,'b'),(5,'x');
SELECT t2.f_int FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 ON (t2.f_key = t1.f_nokey)
WHERE t1.f_nokey IN (
SELECT t1.f_key FROM t1, t2 WHERE t1.f_key = t2.f_key
) HAVING t2.f_int >= 0 AND t2.f_int != 0;
f_int
6
8
DROP TABLE t1,t2;
#
# Bug mdev-5927: an equality in the conjunction of HAVING
# and an equality in WHERE
#
CREATE TABLE t1 (pk int PRIMARY KEY, f int NOT NULL, INDEX(f));
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,0), (2,8);
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE f = 2 HAVING ( pk IN ( SELECT 9 ) AND f != 0 );
pk f
DROP TABLE t1;
End of 5.3 tests
......@@ -657,3 +657,39 @@ set optimizer_switch=@save_optimizer_switch;
drop table t1,t2,t3;
--echo End of 5.2 tests
--echo #
--echo # Bug mdev-6116: an equality in the conjunction of HAVING
--echo # and IN subquery in WHERE
--echo # (The bug is caused by the same problem as bug mdev-5927)
--echo #
CREATE TABLE t1 (f_key varchar(1), f_nokey varchar(1), INDEX(f_key));
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES ('v','v'),('s','s');
CREATE TABLE t2 (f_int int, f_key varchar(1), INDEX(f_key));
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES
(4,'j'),(6,'v'),(3,'c'),(5,'m'),(3,'d'),(2,'d'),(2,'y'),
(9,'t'),(3,'d'),(8,'s'),(1,'r'),(8,'m'),(8,'b'),(5,'x');
SELECT t2.f_int FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 ON (t2.f_key = t1.f_nokey)
WHERE t1.f_nokey IN (
SELECT t1.f_key FROM t1, t2 WHERE t1.f_key = t2.f_key
) HAVING t2.f_int >= 0 AND t2.f_int != 0;
DROP TABLE t1,t2;
--echo #
--echo # Bug mdev-5927: an equality in the conjunction of HAVING
--echo # and an equality in WHERE
--echo #
CREATE TABLE t1 (pk int PRIMARY KEY, f int NOT NULL, INDEX(f));
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,0), (2,8);
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE f = 2 HAVING ( pk IN ( SELECT 9 ) AND f != 0 );
DROP TABLE t1;
--echo End of 5.3 tests
......@@ -13608,7 +13608,7 @@ optimize_cond(JOIN *join, COND *conds,
conds= remove_eq_conds(thd, conds, cond_value);
if (conds && conds->type() == Item::COND_ITEM &&
((Item_cond*) conds)->functype() == Item_func::COND_AND_FUNC)
join->cond_equal= &((Item_cond_and*) conds)->cond_equal;
*cond_equal= &((Item_cond_and*) conds)->cond_equal;
DBUG_EXECUTE("info",print_where(conds,"after remove", QT_ORDINARY););
}
DBUG_RETURN(conds);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment