Commit f8bc5e06 authored by serg@serg.mysql.com's avatar serg@serg.mysql.com

manual.texi Added an explanation to the end of FULLTEXT section

parent b8af8fbe
......@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ Changes in release 3.23.x (Recommended; beta)
* News-3.23.4:: Changes in release 3.23.4
* News-3.23.3:: Changes in release 3.23.3
* News-3.23.2:: Changes in release 3.23.2
* News-3.23.1::
* News-3.23.1::
* News-3.23.0:: Changes in release 3.23.0
Changes in release 3.22.x
......@@ -24699,7 +24699,7 @@ master-slave relationship with @code{log-slave-updates} enabled.
Note, however, that many queries will not work right in this kind of
setup unless your client code is written to take care of the potential
problems that can happen from updates that occur in different sequence
on different servers. Note that the log format has changed in 3.23.26
on different servers. Note that the log format has changed in 3.23.26
so that pre-3.23.26 slaves will not be able to read it.
@item
If the query on the slave gets an error, the slave thread will
......@@ -24739,7 +24739,7 @@ Starting in 3.23.19 you can clean up stale replication leftovers when
something goes wrong and you want a clean start with @code{FLUSH MASTER}
and @code{FLUSH SLAVE} commands. In 3.23.26 we have renamed them to
@code{RESET MASTER} and @code{RESET SLAVE} respectively to clarify
what they do. The old @code{FLUSH} variants still work, though for
what they do. The old @code{FLUSH} variants still work, though for
compatibility.
@item
......@@ -24920,7 +24920,7 @@ index file to be empty. In pre-3.23.26 versions, @code{FLUSH MASTER} (Master)
@item @code{RESET SLAVE}
@tab Makes the slave forget its replication position in the master
logs. In pre 3.23.26 versions the command was called
logs. In pre 3.23.26 versions the command was called
@code{FLUSH SLAVE}(Slave)
@item @code{LOAD TABLE tblname FROM MASTER}
......@@ -36507,6 +36507,18 @@ carefully tuned up this way). For very small tables, word distribution
does not reflect adequately their semantical value, and this model
may sometimes produce bizarre results.
For example search for the word "search" will produce no results in the
above example. Word "search" is present in more than half of rows, and
as, such, is effectively treated as stopword (i.e. with semantical value
zero). It is, really, the desired behaviour - natural language query
should not return every second row in 1GB table.
The word that select 50% of rows has low ability to locate relevant
documents (and will find plenty of unrelevant documents also - we all
know this happen too often when we are trying to find something in Internet
with search engine), and, as such, has low semantical value in @strong{this
particular dataset}.
@page
@cindex environment variables, list of
@node Environment variables, Users, MySQL internals, Top
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment