Commit f8d524cd authored by joerg@mysql.com's avatar joerg@mysql.com

Merge jbruehe@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1

into mysql.com:/M41/mtr-4.1
parents 657d1bd1 15b59156
......@@ -747,3 +747,23 @@ length(a)
10
drop table t1;
deallocate prepare stmt;
create table t1 (col1 integer, col2 integer);
insert into t1 values(100,100),(101,101),(102,102),(103,103);
prepare stmt from 'select col1, col2 from t1 where (col1, col2) in ((?,?))';
set @a=100, @b=100;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
col1 col2
100 100
set @a=101, @b=101;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
col1 col2
101 101
set @a=102, @b=102;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
col1 col2
102 102
set @a=102, @b=103;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
col1 col2
deallocate prepare stmt;
drop table t1;
......@@ -785,4 +785,22 @@ select length(a) from t1;
drop table t1;
deallocate prepare stmt;
#
# Bug#16248 "WHERE (col1,col2) IN ((?,?)) gives wrong results":
# check that ROW implementation is reexecution-friendly.
#
create table t1 (col1 integer, col2 integer);
insert into t1 values(100,100),(101,101),(102,102),(103,103);
prepare stmt from 'select col1, col2 from t1 where (col1, col2) in ((?,?))';
set @a=100, @b=100;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
set @a=101, @b=101;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
set @a=102, @b=102;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
set @a=102, @b=103;
execute stmt using @a,@b;
deallocate prepare stmt;
drop table t1;
# End of 4.1 tests
......@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
*/
Item_row::Item_row(List<Item> &arg):
Item(), used_tables_cache(0), array_holder(1), const_item_cache(1), with_null(0)
Item(), used_tables_cache(0), const_item_cache(1), with_null(0)
{
//TODO: think placing 2-3 component items in item (as it done for function)
......@@ -85,6 +85,20 @@ bool Item_row::fix_fields(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tabl, Item **ref)
}
void Item_row::cleanup()
{
DBUG_ENTER("Item_row::cleanup");
Item::cleanup();
/* Reset to the original values */
used_tables_cache= 0;
const_item_cache= 1;
with_null= 0;
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
}
void Item_row::split_sum_func(THD *thd, Item **ref_pointer_array,
List<Item> &fields)
{
......
......@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ class Item_row: public Item
Item **items;
table_map used_tables_cache;
uint arg_count;
bool array_holder;
bool const_item_cache;
bool with_null;
public:
......@@ -29,7 +28,6 @@ public:
items(item->items),
used_tables_cache(item->used_tables_cache),
arg_count(item->arg_count),
array_holder(0),
const_item_cache(item->const_item_cache),
with_null(0)
{}
......@@ -57,6 +55,7 @@ public:
return 0;
};
bool fix_fields(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tables, Item **ref);
void cleanup();
void split_sum_func(THD *thd, Item **ref_pointer_array, List<Item> &fields);
table_map used_tables() const { return used_tables_cache; };
bool const_item() const { return const_item_cache; };
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment