- Address Monty's review feedback, part 5

- dodge some bug in mysql-test-run that makes it to consider multiple 
  statements as one (most likely it doesn't understand quotes in /* comments */)

subsequent asserts have the wrong meaning.

- Address Monty's review feedback, part 4

- Address Monty's review feedback, part 3

- Address Monty's review feedback, part 1
- Fix buildbot failure 

- Address Monty's review feedback, part 1

companions out of sql_select.h into a separate file sql_join_cache.h.

The bug happened when BKA join algorithm used an incremental buffer
and some of the fields over which access keys were constructed
- were allocated in the previous join buffers
- were non-nullable
- belonged to inner tables of outer joins.
For such fields an offset to the field value in the record is saved
in the postfix of the record, and a zero offset indicates that the value 
is null. Before the key using the field value is constructed the
value is read into the corresponding field of the record buffer and
the null bit is set for the field if the offset is 0. However if
the field is non-nullable the table->null_row must be set to 1
for null values and to 0 for non-null values  to ensure proper reading
of the value from the record buffer.

The condition that was supposed to check whether a join table
is an inner table of a nested outer join or semi-join was not
quite correct in the code of the function check_join_cache_usage.
That's why some queries with nested outer joins triggered 
an assertion failure.
Encapsulated this condition in the new method called
JOIN_TAB::is_nested_inner and provided a proper code for it.

Also corrected a bug in the code of check_join_cache_usage()
that caused a downgrade of not first join buffers of the
level 5 and 7 to level 4 and 6 correspondingly.

When pushing the condition for a table in the function
JOIN_TAB::make_scan_filter the optimizer must not push
conditions from WHERE if the table is some inner table
of an outer join..

The condition over outer tables extracted from the on expression
for a outer join must be ANDed to the condition pushed to the
first inner table of this outer join only.
Nested outer joins cannot use flat join buffers. So if join_cache_level
is set to 1 then any join algorithm employing join buffers cannot be used
for nested outer joins.

The patch that introduced the new enumeration type Match_flag
for the values of match flags in the records put into join buffers
missed the necessary modifications in JOIN_CACHE::set_match_flag_if_none.
This could cause wrong results for outer joins with on expressions
only over outer tables.

A non-incremental join buffer cannot be used for inner tables of nested
outer joins. That's why when join_cache_level is set to 7 it must
be downgraded to level 6 for the inner tables of nested outer joins.
For the same reason with join_cache_level set to 3 no join buffer is
used for the inner tables of outer joins (we could downgrade it to
level 2, but this level does not support ref access).

Made sure that the function that copy a long varchar field from the record
buffer into a key buffer does not copy bytes after the field value.

Miscalculation of the minimum possible buffer size could trigger
an assert in JOIN_CACHE_HASHED::put_record when if join_buffer_size
was set to the values that is less than the length of one record to
stored in the join buffer.
It happened due to the following mistakes:
- underestimation of space needed for a key in the hash table
  (we have to take into account that hash table can have more
  buckets than the expected number of records).
- the value of maximum total length of all records stored in
  the join buffer was not saved in the field max_used_fieldlength
  by the function calc_used_field_length.

BUG#671361: virtual int Mrr_ordered_index_reader::refill_buffer(): Assertion `!know_key_tuple_params
- Make sure we have enough space for both rowids and keys.

The pushdown condition for the sorted table in a query can be complemented
by the conditions from HAVING. This transformation is done in JOIN::exec
pretty late after the original pushdown condition have been saved in the
field pre_idx_push_select_cond for the sorted table. So this field must
be updated after the inclusion of the condition from HAVING.