- 12 Dec, 2007 1 commit
-
-
davi@mysql.com/endora.local authored
The problem is that some DDL statements (ALTER TABLE, CREATE TRIGGER, FLUSH TABLES, ...) when under LOCK TABLES need to momentarily drop the lock, reopen the table and grab the write lock again (using reopen_tables). When grabbing the lock again, reopen_tables doesn't pass a flag to mysql_lock_tables in order to ignore the impending global read lock, which causes a assertion because LOCK_open is being hold. Also dropping the lock must not signal to any threads that the table has been relinquished (related to the locking/flushing protocol). The solution is to correct the way the table is reopenned and the locks grabbed. When reopening the table and under LOCK TABLES, the table version should be set to 0 so other threads have to wait for the table. When grabbing the lock, any other flush should be ignored because it's theoretically a atomic operation. The chosen solution also fixes a potential discrepancy between binlog and GRL (global read lock) because table placeholders were being ignored, now a FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK will properly for table with open placeholders. It's also important to mention that this patch doesn't fix a potential deadlock if one uses two GRLs under LOCK TABLES concurrently.
-
- 10 Dec, 2007 5 commits
-
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/bug27440/my51-bug27440
-
- 07 Dec, 2007 1 commit
-
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
When read_only option was enabled, a user without SUPER privilege could perform CREATE DATABASE and DROP DATABASE operations. This patch adds a check to make sure this isn't possible. It also attempts to simplify the logic used to determine if relevant tables are updated, making it more human readable.
-
- 05 Dec, 2007 2 commits
-
-
davi@endora.local authored
into mysql.com:/Users/davi/mysql/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
davi@mysql.com/endora.local authored
Only select entries from the general_log that were issued by the current connection.
-
- 04 Dec, 2007 2 commits
-
-
anozdrin/alik@station. authored
Disable failing test case.
-
anozdrin/alik@station. authored
Disable failing test case.
-
- 30 Nov, 2007 6 commits
-
-
davi@endora.local authored
into mysql.com:/Users/davi/mysql/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
davi@endora.local authored
into mysql.com:/Users/davi/mysql/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm. authored
The problem was that THD::killed was reset after a command was read from the socket, but before it was actually handled. That lead to a race: if another KILL statement was issued for this connection in the middle of reading from the socket and processing a command, THD::killed state would be cleaned. The fix is to move this cleanup into net_send_error() function. A sample test case exists in binlog_killed.test: - connection 1: start a new transaction on table t1; - connection 2: send query to the server (w/o waiting for the result) to update data in table t1 -- this query will be blocked since there is unfinished transaction; - connection 1: kill query in connection 2 and finish the transaction; - connection 2: get result of the previous query -- it should be the "query-killed" error. This test however contains race condition, which can not be fixed with the current protocol: there is no way to guarantee, that the server will receive and start processing the query in connection 2 (which is intended to get blocked) before the KILL command (sent in the connection 1) will arrive. In other words, there is no way to ensure that the following sequence will not happen: - connection 1: start a new transaction on table t1; - connection 1: kill query in connection 2 and finish the transaction; - connection 2: send query to the server (w/o waiting for the result) to update data in table t1 -- this query will be blocked since there is unfinished transaction; - connection 2: get result of the previous query -- the query will succeed. So, there is no test case for this bug, since it's impossible to write a reliable test case under the current circumstances.
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm. authored
Enabling the test case.
-
davi@mysql.com/endora.local authored
Parser rejects valid INTERVAL() expressions when associated with arithmetic operators. The problem is the way in which the expression and interval grammar rules were organized caused shift/reduce conflicts. The solution is to tweak the interval rules to avoid shift/reduce conflicts by removing the broken interval_expr rule and explicitly specify it's content where necessary. Original fix by Davi Arnaut, revised and improved rules by Marc Alff
-
anozdrin/alik@ibm. authored
The following clarification should be made in The Manual: Standard SQL is quite clear that, if new columns are added to a table after a view on that table is created with "select *", the new columns will not become part of the view. In all cases, the view definition (view structure) is frozen at CREATE time, so changes to the underlying tables do not affect the view structure.
-
- 29 Nov, 2007 1 commit
-
-
davi@mysql.com/endora.local authored
This bug is actually two bugs in one, one of which is CREATE TRIGGER under LOCK TABLES and the other is CREATE TRIGGER under LOCK TABLES simultaneous to a FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK (global read lock). Both situations could lead to a server crash or deadlock. The first problem arises from the fact that when under LOCK TABLES, if the table is in the set of locked tables, the table is already open and it doesn't need to be reopened (not a placeholder). Also in this case, if the table is not write locked, a exclusive lock can't be acquired because of a possible deadlock with another thread also holding a (read) lock on the table. The second issue arises from the fact that one should never wait for a global read lock if it's holding any locked tables, because the global read lock is waiting for these tables and this leads to a circular wait deadlock. The solution for the first case is to check if the table is write locked and upgraded the write lock to a exclusive lock and fail otherwise for non write locked tables. Grabbin the exclusive lock in this case also means to ensure that the table is opened only by the calling thread. The second issue is partly fixed by not waiting for the global read lock if the thread is holding any locked tables. The second issue is only partly addressed in this patch because it turned out to be much wider and also affects other DDL statements. Reported as Bug#32395
-
- 28 Nov, 2007 13 commits
-
-
malff@lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net. authored
into lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net.:/home/malff/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt-merge
-
malff@lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net. authored
into lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net.:/home/malff/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt-merge
-
malff@lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net. authored
-
malff@lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net. authored
into lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net.:/home/malff/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt-merge
-
davi@endora.local authored
into mysql.com:/Users/davi/mysql/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
malff@lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net. authored
into lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net.:/home/malff/TREE/mysql-5.0-rt-merge
-
davi@endora.local authored
into mysql.com:/Users/davi/mysql/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
davi@mysql.com/endora.local authored
Kill of a CREATE TABLE source_table LIKE statement waiting for a name-lock on the source table causes a bad lock interaction. The mysql_create_like_table() has a bug that if the connection is killed while waiting for the name-lock on the source table, it will jump to the wrong error path and try to unlock the source table and LOCK_open, but both weren't locked. The solution is to simple return when the name lock request is killed, it's safe to do so because no lock was acquired and no cleanup is needed. Original bug report also contains description of other problems related to this scenario but they either already fixed in 5.1 or will be addressed separately (see bug report for details).
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.1-axmrg
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
Moved disabling to rpl suite. Bug#32801 wait_timeout.test fails randomly Disabled test case.
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
Disabled test case.
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
-
- 27 Nov, 2007 9 commits
-
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.1-axmrg
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.1-axmrg
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
Disabled the test case.
-
ramil/ram@ramil.myoffice.izhnet.ru authored
into mysql.com:/home/ram/work/b30495/b30495.5.0
-
malff@lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net. authored
into lambda.hsd1.co.comcast.net.:/home/malff/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt-merge
-
ramil/ram@ramil.myoffice.izhnet.ru authored
into mysql.com:/home/ram/work/b30495/b30495.5.1
-