1. 09 Jul, 2006 1 commit
  2. 08 Jul, 2006 1 commit
  3. 07 Jul, 2006 10 commits
  4. 06 Jul, 2006 3 commits
  5. 05 Jul, 2006 4 commits
    • mats@mysql.com's avatar
    • mats@romeo.(none)'s avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/bkroot/mysql-5.1-new-rpl · a3ae3398
      mats@romeo.(none) authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/bk/b20821-mysql-5.1-new-rpl
      a3ae3398
    • mats@mysql.com's avatar
      BUG#20821 (INSERT DELAYED fails to write some rows to binlog): · fd92d807
      mats@mysql.com authored
      Reverting to old behaviour of writing the query before all rows
      have been written.
      fd92d807
    • guilhem@mysql.com's avatar
      Fix for BUG#20188 "REPLACE or ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE in · a43c4b02
      guilhem@mysql.com authored
      auto_increment breaks binlog":
      if slave's table had a higher auto_increment counter than master's (even
      though all rows of the two tables were identical), then in some cases,
      REPLACE and INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE failed to replicate
      statement-based (it inserted different values on slave from on master).
      write_record() contained a "thd->next_insert_id=0" to force an adjustment
      of thd->next_insert_id after the update or replacement. But it is this
      assigment introduced indeterminism of the statement on the slave, thus
      the bug. For ON DUPLICATE, we replace that assignment by a call to
      handler::adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value() which is deterministic
      (does not depend on slave table's autoinc counter). For REPLACE, this
      assignment can simply be removed (as REPLACE can't insert a number larger
      than thd->next_insert_id).
      We also move a too early restore_auto_increment() down to when we really know
      that we can restore the value.
      a43c4b02
  6. 03 Jul, 2006 5 commits
  7. 01 Jul, 2006 6 commits
  8. 30 Jun, 2006 9 commits
  9. 29 Jun, 2006 1 commit