1. 06 May, 2006 4 commits
  2. 05 May, 2006 3 commits
  3. 04 May, 2006 16 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge paul@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · e38edaef
      unknown authored
      into  polar.kitebird.com:/src/extern/MySQL/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      
      e38edaef
    • unknown's avatar
      .del-changelog-4.1.xml~8aa496ebed09d868: · ac5eb33a
      unknown authored
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.1.xml
      
      
      BitKeeper/deleted/.del-changelog-4.1.xml~8aa496ebed09d868:
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.1.xml
      ac5eb33a
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge polar.kitebird.com:/src/extern/MySQL/bk/mysql-4.0 · d2ae2263
      unknown authored
      into  polar.kitebird.com:/src/extern/MySQL/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      
      d2ae2263
    • unknown's avatar
      .del-changelog-4.0.xml~8f56ee8a913e848b: · b8984be3
      unknown authored
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.0.xml
      
      
      BitKeeper/deleted/.del-changelog-4.0.xml~8f56ee8a913e848b:
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.0.xml
      b8984be3
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · d1bd5eeb
      unknown authored
      into  ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi:/home/my/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      
      d1bd5eeb
    • unknown's avatar
      Fixed Bug#11324: · 02dcc76e
      unknown authored
      TIME_FORMAT using "%l:%i" returns 36:00 with 24:00:00 in TIME column
      
      
      mysql-test/r/date_formats.result:
        Added test case for Bug#11324,
        "TIME_FORMAT using "%l:%i" returns 36:00 with 24:00:00 in TIME column"
      mysql-test/t/date_formats.test:
        Added test case for Bug#11324,
        "TIME_FORMAT using "%l:%i" returns 36:00 with 24:00:00 in TIME column"
      02dcc76e
    • unknown's avatar
      Fix for Bug#11326. · bcb61e68
      unknown authored
      
      mysql-test/r/date_formats.result:
        Added test cases for Bug#11326
      mysql-test/t/date_formats.test:
        Added test cases for Bug#11326
      bcb61e68
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · 31ecb598
      unknown authored
      into  a193-229-222-105.elisa-laajakaista.fi:/home/my/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      
      31ecb598
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · 0aa51931
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16372
      
      
      0aa51931
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · 144d2ec9
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16501
      
      
      144d2ec9
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · 4624d395
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16372
      
      
      4624d395
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · ac941700
      unknown authored
      into  hundin.mysql.fi:/home/jani/mysql-4.1
      
      
      sql/sql_show.cc:
        Auto merged
      ac941700
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · a5a4f767
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16501
      
      
      a5a4f767
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge tnurnberg@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · 66d4b40c
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/mysql-4.1-19025e
      
      
      66d4b40c
    • unknown's avatar
      test result fixed · 812a82ed
      unknown authored
      
      mysql-test/r/mysqltest.result:
        result fixed
      812a82ed
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#19025 4.1 mysqldump doesn't correctly dump "auto_increment = [int]" · d300ceea
      unknown authored
      mysqldump / SHOW CREATE TABLE will show the NEXT available value for
      the PK, rather than the *first* one that was available (that named in
      the original CREATE TABLE ... AUTO_INCREMENT = ... statement).
      
      This should produce correct and robust behaviour for the obvious use
      cases -- when no data were inserted, then we'll produce a statement
      featuring the same value the original CREATE TABLE had; if we dump
      with values, INSERTing the values on the target machine should set the
      correct next_ID anyway (and if not, we'll still have our AUTO_INCREMENT =
      ... to do that). Lastly, just the CREATE statement (with no data) for
      a table that saw inserts would still result in a table that new values
      could safely be inserted to).
      
      There seems to be no robust way however to see whether the next_ID
      field is > 1 because it was set to something else with CREATE TABLE
      ... AUTO_INCREMENT = ..., or because there is an AUTO_INCREMENT column
      in  the table (but no initial value was set with AUTO_INCREMENT = ...)
      and then one or more rows were INSERTed, counting up next_ID. This
      means that in both cases, we'll generate an AUTO_INCREMENT =
      ... clause in SHOW CREATE TABLE / mysqldump.  As we also show info on,
      say, charsets even if the user did not explicitly give that info in
      their own CREATE TABLE, this shouldn't be an issue.
      
      As per above, the next_ID will be affected by any INSERTs that have
      taken place, though.  This /should/ result in correct and robust
      behaviour, but it may look non-intuitive to some users if they CREATE
      TABLE ... AUTO_INCREMENT = 1000 and later (after some INSERTs) have
      SHOW CREATE TABLE give them a different value (say, CREATE TABLE
      ... AUTO_INCREMENT = 1006), so the docs should possibly feature a
      caveat to that effect.
      
      It's not very intuitive the way it works now (with the fix), but it's
      *correct*.  We're not storing the original value anyway, if we wanted
      that, we'd have to change on-disk representation?
      
      If we do dump/load cycles with empty DBs, nothing will change.  This
      changeset includes an additional test case that proves that tables
      with rows will create the same next_ID for AUTO_INCREMENT = ... across
      dump/restore cycles.
      
      Confirmed by support as likely solution for client's problem.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/auto_increment.result:
        test for creation of AUTO_INCREMENT=... clause
      mysql-test/r/gis-rtree.result:
        Add AUTO_INCREMENT=... clauses where appropriate
      mysql-test/r/mysqldump.result:
        show that AUTO_INCREMENT=... will survive dump/restore cycles
      mysql-test/r/symlink.result:
        Add AUTO_INCREMENT=... clauses where appropriate
      mysql-test/t/auto_increment.test:
        test for creation of AUTO_INCREMENT=... clause
      mysql-test/t/mysqldump.test:
        show that AUTO_INCREMENT=... will survive dump/restore cycles
      sql/sql_show.cc:
        Add AUTO_INCREMENT=... to output of SHOW CREATE TABLE if there is an
        AUTO_INCREMENT column, and NEXT_ID > 1 (the default).  We must not print
        the clause for engines that do not support this as it would break the
        import of dumps, but as of this writing, the test for whether
        AUTO_INCREMENT columns are allowed and wether AUTO_INCREMENT=...
        is supported is identical, !(file->table_flags() & HA_NO_AUTO_INCREMENT))
        Because of that, we do not explicitly test for the feature,
        but may extrapolate its existence from that of an AUTO_INCREMENT column.
      d300ceea
  4. 03 May, 2006 8 commits
  5. 02 May, 2006 3 commits
  6. 01 May, 2006 5 commits
  7. 30 Apr, 2006 1 commit