1. 30 Jan, 2007 3 commits
    • malff/marcsql@weblab.(none)'s avatar
      manual merge · 52e614c5
      malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
      52e614c5
    • malff/marcsql@weblab.(none)'s avatar
      Merge weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-21904 · df0fbdf5
      malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
      into  weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-21904-merge
      df0fbdf5
    • malff/marcsql@weblab.(none)'s avatar
      Bug#21904 (parser problem when using IN with a double "(())") · f5ad4eed
      malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
      Before this fix, a IN predicate of the form: "IN (( subselect ))", with two
      parenthesis, would be evaluated as a single row subselect: if the subselect
      returns more that 1 row, the statement would fail.
      
      The SQL:2003 standard defines a special exception in the specification,
      and mandates that this particular form of IN predicate shall be equivalent
      to "IN ( subselect )", which involves a table subquery and works with more
      than 1 row.
      
      This fix implements "IN (( subselect ))", "IN ((( subselect )))" etc
      as per the SQL:2003 requirement.
      
      All the details related to the implementation of this change have been
      commented in the code, and the relevant sections of the SQL:2003 spec
      are given for reference, so they are not repeated here.
      
      Having access to the spec is a requirement to review in depth this patch.
      f5ad4eed
  2. 29 Jan, 2007 3 commits
  3. 25 Jan, 2007 14 commits
  4. 24 Jan, 2007 20 commits