1. 24 Sep, 2010 2 commits
  2. 22 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  3. 21 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  4. 17 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  5. 16 Sep, 2010 4 commits
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      Bug#50402 Optimizer producing wrong results when using Index Merge on InnoDB · 86d7cbd4
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      Subselect executes twice, at JOIN::optimize stage
      and at JOIN::execute stage. At optimize stage
      Innodb prebuilt struct which is used for the
      retrieval of column values is initialized in.
      ha_innobase::index_read(), prebuilt->sql_stat_start is true.
      After QUICK_ROR_INTERSECT_SELECT finished his job it
      restores read_set/write_set bitmaps with initial values
      and deactivates one of the handlers used by
      QUICK_ROR_INTERSECT_SELECT in JOIN::cleanup
      (it's the case when we reuse original handler as one of
       handlers required by QUICK_ROR_INTERSECT_SELECT object).
      On second subselect execution inactive handler is activated
      in  QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::reset, file->ha_index_init().
      In ha_index_init Innodb prebuilt struct is reinitialized
      with inappropriate read_set/write_set bitmaps. Further
      reinitialization in ha_innobase::index_read() does not
      happen as prebuilt->sql_stat_start is false.
      It leads to partial retrieval of required field values
      and we get a mix of field values from different records
      in the record buffer.
      The fix is to reset
      read_set/write_set bitmaps as these values
      are required for proper intialization of
      internal InnoDB struct which is used for
      the retrieval of column values
      (see build_template(), ha_innodb.cc)
      86d7cbd4
    • Magne Mahre's avatar
      Bug #54606 innodb fast alter table + pack_keys=0 prevents · f43d6c2b
      Magne Mahre authored
                 adding new indexes
      
      A fast alter table requires that the existing (old) table
      and indices are unchanged (i.e only new indices can be
      added).  To verify this, the layout and flags of the old
      table/indices are compared for equality with the new.
      
      The PACK_KEYS option is a no-op in InnoDB, but the flag
      exists, and is used in the table compare.  We need to
      check this (table) option flag before deciding whether an 
      index should be packed or not.  If the table has
      explicitly set PACK_KEYS to 0, the created indices should
      not be marked as packed/packable. 
      f43d6c2b
    • Dmitry Shulga's avatar
      Fixed bug#42503 - "Lost connection" errors when using · be794bc5
      Dmitry Shulga authored
      compression protocol.
      
      The loss of connection was caused by a malformed packet
      sent by the server in case when query cache was in use.
      When storing data in the query cache, the query  cache
      memory allocation algorithm had a tendency to reduce
      the amount of memory block necessary to store a result
      set, up to finally storing the entire result set in a single
      block. With a significant result set, this memory block
      could turn out to be quite large - 30, 40 MB and on.
      When such a result set was sent to the client, the entire
      memory block was compressed and written to network as a
      single network packet. However, the length of the
      network packet is limited by 0xFFFFFF (16MB), since
      the packet format only allows 3 bytes for packet length.
      As a result, a malformed, overly large packet
      with truncated length would be sent to the client
      and break the client/server protocol.
      
      The solution is, when sending result sets from the query
      cache, to ensure that the data is chopped into
      network packets of size <= 16MB, so that there
      is no corruption of packet length. This solution,
      however, has a shortcoming: since the result set
      is still stored in the query cache as a single block,
      at the time of sending, we've lost boundaries of individual
      logical packets (one logical packet = one row of the result
      set) and thus can end up sending a truncated logical
      packet in a compressed network packet.
      
      As a result, on the client we may require more memory than 
      max_allowed_packet to keep, both, the truncated
      last logical packet, and the compressed next packet.
      This never (or in practice never) happens without compression,
      since without compression it's very unlikely that
      a) a truncated logical packet would remain on the client
      when it's time to read the next packet
      b) a subsequent logical packet that is being read would be
      so large that size-of-new-packet + size-of-old-packet-tail >
      max_allowed_packet.
      To remedy this issue, we send data in 1MB sized packets,
      that's below the current client default of 16MB for
      max_allowed_packet, but large enough to ensure there is no
      unnecessary overhead from too many syscalls per result set.
      be794bc5
    • Mikael Ronstrom's avatar
  6. 13 Sep, 2010 4 commits
    • Mattias Jonsson's avatar
      merge · 061769d7
      Mattias Jonsson authored
      061769d7
    • Mattias Jonsson's avatar
      merge · 99e507e8
      Mattias Jonsson authored
      99e507e8
    • Martin Hansson's avatar
      Bug #50394: Regression in EXPLAIN with index scan, LIMIT, GROUP BY and · 20bdf763
      Martin Hansson authored
      ORDER BY computed col
            
      GROUP BY implies ORDER BY in the MySQL dialect of SQL. Therefore, when an
      index on the first table in the query is used, and that index satisfies
      ordering according to the GROUP BY clause, the query optimizer estimates the
      number of tuples that need to be read from this index. If there is a LIMIT
      clause, table statistics on tables following this 'sort table' are employed.
      
      There may be a separate ORDER BY clause however, which mandates reading the
      whole 'sort table' anyway. But the previous estimate was left untouched.
      
      Fixed by removing the estimate from EXPLAIN output if GROUP BY is used in
      conjunction with an ORDER BY clause that mandates using a temporary table.
      20bdf763
    • Gleb Shchepa's avatar
      Bug #55779: select does not work properly in mysql server · 79c1faa0
      Gleb Shchepa authored
                  Version "5.1.42 SUSE MySQL RPM"
      
      When a query was using a DATE or DATETIME value formatted
      using different formatting than "yyyy-mm-dd HH:MM:SS", a
      query with a greater-or-equal '>=' condition matched only
      greater values in an indexed TIMESTAMP column.
      
      The problem was introduced by the fix for the bug 46362
      and partially solved (for DATE and DATETIME columns only)
      by the fix for the bug 47925.
      
      The stored_field_cmp_to_item function has been modified
      to take into account TIMESTAMP columns like we do for
      DATE and DATETIME columns.
      79c1faa0
  7. 10 Sep, 2010 3 commits
  8. 09 Sep, 2010 3 commits
    • Alexey Kopytov's avatar
      Addendum patch for bug #54190. · f563a012
      Alexey Kopytov authored
      The patch caused some test failures when merged to 5.5 because,
      unlike 5.1, it utilizes Item_cache_row to actually cache row
      values. The problem was that Item_cache_row::bring_value()
      essentially did nothing. In particular, it did not update its
      null_value, so all Item_cache_row objects were always having
      their null_values set to TRUE. This went unnoticed previously,
      but now when Arg_comparator::compare_row() actually depends on
      the row's null_value to evaluate the comparison, the problem
      has surfaced.
      
      Fixed by calling the underlying item's bring_value() and
      updating null_value in Item_cache_row::bring_value().
      
      Since the problem also exists in 5.1 code (albeit hidden, since
      the relevant code is not used anywhere), the addendum patch is
      against 5.1.
      f563a012
    • Alexey Kopytov's avatar
      Automerge. · df198b5f
      Alexey Kopytov authored
      df198b5f
    • Alexey Kopytov's avatar
      Bug #54190: Comparison to row subquery produces incorrect · 9066714c
      Alexey Kopytov authored
                  result
      
      Row subqueries producing no rows were not handled as UNKNOWN
      values in row comparison expressions.
      
      That was a result of the following two problems:
      
      1. Item_singlerow_subselect did not mark the resulting row
      value as NULL/UNKNOWN when no rows were produced.
      
      2. Arg_comparator::compare_row() did not take into account that
      a whole argument may be NULL rather than just individual scalar
      values.
      
      Before bug#34384 was fixed, the above problems were hidden
      because an uninitialized (i.e. without any stored value) cached
      object would appear as NULL for scalar values in a row subquery
      returning an empty result. After the fix
      Arg_comparator::compare_row() would try to evaluate
      uninitialized cached objects.
      
      Fixed by removing the aforementioned problems.
      9066714c
  9. 07 Sep, 2010 5 commits
    • Mattias Jonsson's avatar
      Bug#55458: Partitioned MyISAM table gets crashed by multi-table update · 063a34b6
      Mattias Jonsson authored
      Updated according to reviewers comments.
      063a34b6
    • Martin Hansson's avatar
      Bug#51070: Query with a NOT IN subquery predicate returns a wrong result set · babebf9c
      Martin Hansson authored
            
      The EXISTS transformation has additional switches to catch the known corner
      cases that appear when transforming an IN predicate into EXISTS. Guarded
      conditions are used which are deactivated when a NULL value is seen in the
      outer expression's row. When the inner query block supplies NULL values,
      however, they are filtered out because no distinction is made between the
      guarded conditions; guarded NOT x IS NULL conditions in the HAVING clause that
      filter out NULL values cannot be de-activated in isolation from those that
      match values or from the outer expression or NULL's.
      
      The above problem is handled by making the guarded conditions remember whether
      they have rejected a NULL value or not, and index access methods are taking
      this into account as well. 
      
      The bug consisted of 
      
      1) Not resetting the property for every nested loop iteration on the inner
         query's result.
      
      2) Not propagating the NULL result properly from inner query to IN optimizer.
      
      3) A hack that may or may not have been needed at some point. According to a
         comment it was aimed to fix #2 by returning NULL when FALSE was actually
         the result. This caused failures when #2 was properly fixed. The hack is
         now removed.
      
      The fix resolves all three points.
      babebf9c
    • Dmitry Shulga's avatar
      Fixed bug #55421 - Protocol::end_statement(): Assertion `0' on · 70807d14
      Dmitry Shulga authored
      multi-table UPDATE IGNORE.
      The problem was that if there was an active SELECT statement
      during trigger execution, an error risen during the execution
      may cause a crash. The fix is to temporary reset LEX::current_select
      before trigger execution and restore it afterwards. This way
      errors risen during the trigger execution are processed as
      if there was no active SELECT.
      70807d14
    • Martin Hansson's avatar
      Bug#54543: update ignore with incorrect subquery leads to assertion failure: · 3d5b9792
      Martin Hansson authored
      inited==INDEX
      
      When an error occurs while sending the data in a temporary table there was no
      cleanup performed. This caused a failed assertion in the case when different
      access methods were used for populating the table vs. retrieving the data from
      the table if IGNORE was specified and sql_safe_updates = 0. In this case
      execution continues, but the handler expects to continue with the access
      method used for row retrieval.
      
      Fixed by doing the cleanup even if errors occur.
      3d5b9792
    • Dmitry Shulga's avatar
      Fixed bug #47485 - mysql_store_result returns a not NULL result set · 14dbc7e4
      Dmitry Shulga authored
      for a prepared statement.
      14dbc7e4
  10. 02 Sep, 2010 1 commit
  11. 01 Sep, 2010 1 commit
    • Magne Mahre's avatar
      Bug#39932 "create table fails if column for FK is in different · 24fc7ca4
      Magne Mahre authored
                case than in corr index".
            
      Server was unable to find existing or explicitly created supporting
      index for foreign key if corresponding statement clause used field
      names in case different than one used in key specification and created
      yet another supporting index.
      In cases when name of constraint (and thus name of generated index)
      was the same as name of existing/explicitly created index this led
      to duplicate key name error.
            
      The problem was that unlike all other code Key_part_spec::operator==()
      compared field names in case sensitive fashion. As result routines
      responsible for getting rid of redundant generated supporting indexes
      for foreign key were not working properly for versions of field names
      using different cases.
      
      (backported from mysql-trunk)
      24fc7ca4
  12. 31 Aug, 2010 1 commit
  13. 30 Aug, 2010 2 commits
  14. 27 Aug, 2010 1 commit
  15. 26 Aug, 2010 1 commit
    • Mattias Jonsson's avatar
      Bug#53806: Wrong estimates for range query in partitioned MyISAM table · 50150fd6
      Mattias Jonsson authored
      Bug#46754: 'rows' field doesn't reflect partition pruning
      
      The EXPLAIN's result in 'rows' field
      was evaluated to number of rows when the table was opened
      (not from the table cache) and only the partitions left
      after pruning was updated with its correct number
      of rows.
      
      The evaluation of the 'rows' field was using handler::records()
      which is a potentially expensive call, and ignores the partitioning
      pruning.
      
      The fix was to use the handlers stats.records after updating it
      with ::info(HA_STATUS_VARIABLE) instead.
      50150fd6
  16. 25 Aug, 2010 2 commits
  17. 24 Aug, 2010 1 commit
  18. 30 Aug, 2010 5 commits
  19. 27 Aug, 2010 1 commit