- 16 Nov, 2007 3 commits
-
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-4.1-axmrg
-
- 14 Nov, 2007 12 commits
-
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
gluh@mysql.com/eagle.(none) authored
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-bug4692
-
gluh@eagle.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/gluh/MySQL/Merge/5.0-opt
-
gluh@eagle.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/gluh/MySQL/Merge/5.0-opt
-
gluh@mysql.com/eagle.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/gluh/MySQL/Merge/4.1-opt
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
Post-pushbuild fix Added a purecov comment and a test for coverage of parallel enable keys.
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
svoj@june.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG31277/mysql-5.0-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/june.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG31277/mysql-4.1-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/june.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG31277/mysql-4.1-engines
-
- 13 Nov, 2007 5 commits
-
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/31305/my50-31305
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/31305/my50-31305
-
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/31305/my41-31305
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
into magare.gmz:/home/kgeorge/mysql/autopush/B31562-5.0-opt
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
The columns in HAVING can reference the GROUP BY and SELECT columns. There can be "table" prefixes when referencing these columns. And these "table" prefixes in HAVING use the table alias if available. This means that table aliases are subject to the same storage rules as table names and are dependent on lower_case_table_names in the same way as the table names are. Fixed by : 1. Treating table aliases as table names and make them lowercase when printing out the SQL statement for view persistence. 2. Using case insensitive comparison for table aliases when requested by lower_case_table_names
-
- 12 Nov, 2007 11 commits
-
-
mattiasj@mattiasj-laptop.(none) authored
into mattiasj-laptop.(none):/home/mattiasj/clones/mysql-5.0-engines_with_main
-
mattiasj@mattiasj-laptop.(none) authored
into mattiasj-laptop.(none):/home/mattiasj/clones/mysql-5.0-engines_with_main
-
svoj@june.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG32111/mysql-5.0-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/june.mysql.com authored
Use proper variable for test.
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
svoj@june.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG32111/mysql-5.0-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/june.mysql.com authored
-
svoj@mysql.com/june.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG32111/mysql-4.1-engines
-
kaa@polly.(none) authored
into polly.(none):/home/kaa/src/opt/mysql-5.0-opt
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/31305/my50-31305
-
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none) authored
When we insert a record into MYISAM table which is almost 'full', we first write record data in the free space inside a file, and then check if we have enough space after the end of the file. So if we don't have the space, table will left corrupted. Similar error also happens when we updata MYISAM tables. Fixed by modifying write_dynamic_record and update_dynamic_record functions to check for free space before writing parts of a record
-
- 11 Nov, 2007 1 commit
-
-
istruewing@stella.local authored
into stella.local:/home2/mydev/mysql-5.0-axmrg
-
- 10 Nov, 2007 8 commits
-
-
tnurnberg@white.intern.koehntopp.de authored
into mysql.com:/misc/mysql/31700/50-31700
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
-
kaa@polly.(none) authored
into polly.(none):/home/kaa/src/opt/mysql-5.0-opt
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
After adding an index the <VARBINARY> IN (SELECT <BINARY> ...) clause returned a wrong result: the VARBINARY value was illegally padded with zero bytes to the length of the BINARY column for the index search. (<VARBINARY>, ...) IN (SELECT <BINARY>, ... ) clauses are affected too.
-
tnurnberg@white.intern.koehntopp.de authored
into mysql.com:/misc/mysql/31700/50-31700
-
UNIQUE (eq-ref) lookups result in table being considered as a "constant" table. Queries that consist of only constant tables are processed in do_select() in a special way that doesn't invoke evaluate_join_record(), and therefore doesn't increase the counters join->examined_rows and join->thd->row_count. The patch increases these counters in this special case. NOTICE: This behavior seems to contradict what the documentation says in Sect. 5.11.4: "Queries handled by the query cache are not added to the slow query log, nor are queries that would not benefit from the presence of an index because the table has zero rows or one row." No test case in 5.0 as issue shows only in slow query log, and other counters can give subtly different values (with regard to counting in create_sort_index(), synthetic rows in ROLLUP, etc.).
-
tnurnberg@white.intern.koehntopp.de authored
into mysql.com:/scratch/tnurnberg/31800/50-31800
-