- 22 Aug, 2007 7 commits
-
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-30237
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-23062
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-30237
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
This is a performance bug, related to the parsing or 'OR' and 'AND' boolean expressions. Let N be the number of expressions involved in a OR (respectively AND). When N=1 For example, "select 1" involve only 1 term: there is no OR operator. In 4.0 and 4.1, parsing expressions not involving OR had no overhead. In 5.0, parsing adds some overhead, with Select->expr_list. With this patch, the overhead introduced in 5.0 has been removed, so that performances for N=1 should be identical to the 4.0 performances, which are optimal (there is no code executed at all) The overhead in 5.0 was in fact affecting significantly some operations. For example, loading 1 Million rows into a table with INSERTs, for a table that has 100 columns, leads to parsing 100 Millions of expressions, which means that the overhead related to Select->expr_list is executed 100 Million times ... Considering that N=1 is by far the most probable expression, this case should be optimal. When N=2 For example, "select a OR b" involves 2 terms in the OR operator. In 4.0 and 4.1, parsing expressions involving 2 terms created 1 Item_cond_or node, which is the expected result. In 5.0, parsing these expression also produced 1 node, but with some extra overhead related to Select->expr_list : creating 1 list in Select->expr_list and another in Item_cond::list is inefficient. With this patch, the overhead introduced in 5.0 has been removed so that performances for N=2 should be identical to the 4.0 performances. Note that the memory allocation uses the new (thd->mem_root) syntax directly. The cost of "is_cond_or" is estimated to be neglectable: the real problem of the performance degradation comes from unneeded memory allocations. When N>=3 For example, "select a OR b OR c ...", which involves 3 or more terms. In 4.0 and 4.1, the parser had no significant cost overhead, but produced an Item tree which is difficult to evaluate / optimize during runtime. In 5.0, the parser produces a better Item tree, using the Item_cond constructor that accepts a list of children directly, but at an extra cost related to Select->expr_list. With this patch, the code is implemented to take the best of the two implementations: - there is no overhead with Select->expr_list - the Item tree generated is optimized and flattened. This is achieved by adding children nodes into the Item tree directly, with Item_cond::add(), which avoids the need for temporary lists and memory allocation Note that this patch also provide an extra optimization, that the previous code in 5.0 did not provide: expressions are flattened in the Item tree, based on what the expression already parsed is, and not based on the order in which rules are reduced. For example : "(a OR b) OR c", "a OR (b OR c)" would both be represented with 2 Item_cond_or nodes before this patch, and with 1 node only with this patch. The logic used is based on the mathematical properties of the OR operator (it's associative), and produces a simpler tree.
-
- 21 Aug, 2007 5 commits
-
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/bug30269/my51-bug30269
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
Although the query cache doesn't support retrieval of statements containing column level access control, it was still possible to cache such statements thus wasting memory. This patch extends the access control check on the target tables to avoid caching a statement with column level restrictions. Views are excepted and can be cached but only retrieved by super user account.
-
- 20 Aug, 2007 4 commits
-
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt-merge
-
malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-rt-merge
-
- 18 Aug, 2007 5 commits
-
-
tsmith@ramayana.hindu.god authored
Finish premature patch which was accidentally pushed; remove debugging info and correct the test.
-
tsmith@ramayana.hindu.god authored
into ramayana.hindu.god:/home/tsmith/m/bk/maint/51
-
tsmith@ramayana.hindu.god authored
into ramayana.hindu.god:/home/tsmith/m/bk/maint/51
-
tsmith@ramayana.hindu.god authored
into ramayana.hindu.god:/home/tsmith/m/bk/maint/50
-
tsmith@ramayana.hindu.god authored
When using --log --log-output=table, we increment Table_locks_immediate with every query. The wait_condition.inc runs a query a variable number of times, depending on server load, etc. This is a problem, when the test is checking the Table_locks_immediate value. Fix is to adjust the Table_locks_immediate value based on how many times the wait_condition query was executed.
-
- 17 Aug, 2007 10 commits
-
-
davi@moksha.local authored
into moksha.local:/Users/davi/mysql/push/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
davi@moksha.local authored
This is a follow up for the patch for Bug#26162 "Trigger DML ignores low_priority_updates setting", where the stored procedure ignores the session setting of low_priority_updates.
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.0-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/mysql-5.1-runtime
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
into adventure.(none):/home/thek/Development/cpp/bug30269/my51-bug30269
-
thek@adventure.(none) authored
Although the query cache doesn't support retrieval of statements containing column level access control, it was still possible to cache such statements thus wasting memory. This patch extends the access control check on the target tables to avoid caching a statement with column level restrictions.
-
davi@moksha.local authored
mysql_ha_open calls mysql_ha_close on the error path (unsupported) to close the (opened) table before inserting it into the tables hash list handler_tables_hash) but mysql_ha_close only closes tables which are on the hash list, causing the table to be left open and locked. This change moves the table close logic into a separate function that is always called on the error path of mysql_ha_open or on a normal handler close (mysql_ha_close).
-
mats@kindahl-laptop.dnsalias.net authored
-
mats@kindahl-laptop.dnsalias.net authored
into kindahl-laptop.dnsalias.net:/home/bk/fix-mysql-5.1-rpl
-
- 16 Aug, 2007 9 commits
-
-
-
tsmith@ramayana.hindu.god authored
into ramayana.hindu.god:/home/tsmith/m/bk/maint/51
-
kostja@bodhi.(none) authored
-
davi@moksha.local authored
This is a follow up for the patch for Bug#26162 "Trigger DML ignores low_priority_updates setting", where the stored procedure ignores the session setting of low_priority_updates. For every table open operation with default write (TL_WRITE_DEFAULT) lock_type, downgrade the lock type to the session setting of low_priority_updates.
-
kostja@bodhi.(none) authored
-
tsmith@ramayana.hindu.god authored
Revert the fix for bug 21587. That bug will be re-opened, and a new fix must be created.
-
kostja@bodhi.(none) authored
-
-
kostja@bodhi.(none) authored
-