1. 10 Oct, 2006 4 commits
    • kroki/tomash@moonlight.intranet's avatar
      Fix after manial merge. · b2c6ff7a
      kroki/tomash@moonlight.intranet authored
      b2c6ff7a
    • kroki/tomash@moonlight.intranet's avatar
      Merge moonlight.intranet:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-5.0 · ee9afdbc
      kroki/tomash@moonlight.intranet authored
      into  moonlight.intranet:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-5.0-bug19111
      ee9afdbc
    • kroki/tomash@moonlight.intranet's avatar
      Bug#19111: TRIGGERs selecting from a VIEW on the firing base table fail. · 4a28f8f1
      kroki/tomash@moonlight.intranet authored
      In a trigger or a function used in a statement it is possible to do
      SELECT from a table being modified by the statement.  However,
      encapsulation of such SELECT into a view and selecting from a view
      instead of direct SELECT was not possible.
      
      This happened because tables used by views (which in their turn
      were used from functions/triggers) were not excluded from checks
      in unique_table() routine as it happens for the rest of tables
      added to the statement table list for prelocking.
      
      With this fix we ignore all such tables in unique_table(), thus
      providing consistency: inside a trigger or a functions SELECT from
      a view may be used where plain SELECT is allowed.  Modification of
      the same table from function or trigger is still disallowed.  Also,
      this patch doesn't affect the case where SELECT from the table being
      modified is done outside of function of trigger, such SELECTs are
      still disallowed (this limitation and visibility problem when function
      select from a table being modified are subjects of bug 21326).  See
      also bug 22427.
      4a28f8f1
    • kostja@bodhi.local's avatar
      Merge bodhi.local:/opt/local/work/mysql-5.0-root · b262a6a4
      kostja@bodhi.local authored
      into  bodhi.local:/opt/local/work/mysql-5.0-runtime
      b262a6a4
  2. 09 Oct, 2006 1 commit
    • malff/marcsql@weblab.(none)'s avatar
      Bug#21462 (Stored procedures with no arguments require parenthesis) · 6e809b24
      malff/marcsql@weblab.(none) authored
      The syntax of the CALL statement, to invoke a stored procedure, has been
      changed to make the use of parenthesis optional in the argument list.
      With this change, "CALL p;" is equivalent to "CALL p();".
      
      While the SQL spec does not explicitely mandate this syntax, supporting it
      is needed for practical reasons, for integration with JDBC / ODBC connectors.
      
      Also, warnings in the sql/sql_yacc.yy file, which were not reported by Bison 2.1
      but are now reported by Bison 2.2, have been fixed.
      
      The warning found were:
      bison -y -p MYSQL  -d --debug --verbose sql_yacc.yy
      sql_yacc.yy:653.9-18: warning: symbol UNLOCK_SYM redeclared
      sql_yacc.yy:656.9-17: warning: symbol UNTIL_SYM redeclared
      sql_yacc.yy:658.9-18: warning: symbol UPDATE_SYM redeclared
      sql_yacc.yy:5169.11-5174.11: warning: unused value: $2
      sql_yacc.yy:5208.11-5220.11: warning: unused value: $5
      sql_yacc.yy:5221.11-5234.11: warning: unused value: $5
      conflicts: 249 shift/reduce
      
      "unused value: $2" correspond to the $$=$1 assignment in the 1st {} block
      in table_ref -> join_table {} {},
      which does not procude a result ($$) for the rule but an intermediate $2
      value for the action instead.
      "unused value: $5" are similar, with $$ assignments in {} actions blocks
      which are not for the final reduce.
      6e809b24
  3. 08 Oct, 2006 3 commits
  4. 06 Oct, 2006 8 commits
  5. 05 Oct, 2006 4 commits
  6. 03 Oct, 2006 16 commits
  7. 02 Oct, 2006 4 commits