- 08 Nov, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Aditya A authored
Analysis --------- my_stat() calls stat() and if the stat() call fails we try to set the variable my_errno which is actually a thread specific data . We try to get the address of this thread specific data using my_pthread_getspecifc(),but for the purge thread we have not defined any thread specific data so it returns null and when dereferencing null we get a segmentation fault. init_available_charsets() seen in the core stack is invoked through pthread_once() .pthread_once is used for one time initialization.Since free_charsets() is called before innodb plugin shutdown ,purge thread calls init_avaliable_charsets() which leads to the crash. Fix --- Call free_charsets() after the innodb plugin shutdown,since purge threads are still using the charsets.
-
Aditya A authored
Follow up patch to address the pb2 failures.
-
- 07 Nov, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Venkata Sidagam authored
Brief description: After insert some rows to MEMORY table with HASH key some rows can't be deleted in one step. Problem Analysis/solution: info->current_ptr will have the information about the current hash pointer from where we can traverse to the list to get all the remaining tuples. In hp_delete_key we are updating info->current_ptr with the last_pos based on the flag parameter(which is the keydef and last index are same). As part of the fix we are making it to zero only when the code flow reaches to the end of the function hp_delete_key() it means that the next record which has to get deleted will be at the starting of the list so, that in the next call to read record(heap_rnext()) will take line number 100 path instead of 102 path, please see the below code in file hp_rnext.c, function heap_rnext(). 99 else if (!info->current_ptr) /* Deleted or first call */ 100 pos= hp_search(info, keyinfo, info->lastkey, 0); 101 else 102 pos= hp_search(info, keyinfo, info->lastkey, 1); with that change the hp_search() will update the info->current_ptr with the record which needs to be deleted.
-
- 06 Nov, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Aditya A authored
PROBLEM ------- optimize on partiton will recreate the whole table instead of just partition. ANALYSIS -------- At present innodb doesn't support optimize option ,so we do a rebuild of the whole table and then call analyze() on the table.Presently for any optimize() option (on table or partition) we display the following info to the user "Table does not support optimize, doing recreate + analyze instead". FIX --- It was decided for GA versions(5.1 and 5.5) whenever the user tries to optimize a partition(s) we will will display the following info the user "Table does not support optimize on partitions. All partitions will be rebuilt and analyzed." Earlier partitions were not analyzed.Now all partitions will be analyzed. If the user wants to optimize the whole table ,we will display the previous info to the user. i.e "Table does not support optimize, doing recreate + analyze instead" For 5.6+ versions we will raise a new bug to support optimize() options in innodb.
-
- 05 Nov, 2012 1 commit
-
-
akhil.mohan@oracle.com authored
-
- 01 Nov, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Tor Didriksen authored
Add missing DBUG_RETURNs, otherwise the debug-stack gets messed up, and _db_enter_ and _db_exit_ will access data outside the current stack frame.
-
- 30 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Anirudh Mangipudi authored
TO 'MYISAM_SORT_BUFFER_SIZE' Problem: 'myisam_sort_buffer_size' is a parameter used by mysqld program only whereas 'sort_buffer_size' is used by mysqld and myisamchk programs. But the error message printed when myisamchk program is run with insufficient buffer size is myisam_sort_buffer_size is too small which may mislead to the server parameter myisam_sort_buffer_size. SOLUTION: A parameter 'myisam_sort_buffer_size' is added as an alias for 'sort_buffer_size' and the 'sort_buffer_size' parameter is marked as deprecated. So myisamchk also has both the parameters with the same role.
-
Shivji Kumar Jha authored
main.mysqlbinlog_row_innodb are skipped by mtr === Problem === The following tests are wrongly placed in main suite and as a result these are not run with proper binlog format combinations. Some are always skipped by mtr. 1) mysqlbinlog_row_myisam 2) mysqlbinlog_row_innodb 3) mysqlbinlog_row.test 4) mysqlbinlog_row_trans.test 5) mysqlbinlog-cp932 6) mysqlbinlog2 7) mysqlbinlog_base64 === Background === mtr runs the tests placed in main suite with binlog format=stmt. Those that need to be tested against binlog format=row or mixed or more than one binlog format and require only one mysql server are placed in binlog suite. mtr runs tests in binlog suite with all three binlog formats(stmt,row and mixed). === Fix === 1) Moved the test listed in problem section above to binlog suite. 2) Added prefix "binlog_" to the name of each test case moved. Renamed the coresponding result files and option files accordingly.
-
- 29 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
No commit message
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
- 22 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
IN ALTER TABLE ... ADD UNIQUE KEY A bogus debug assertion failure occurred when reporting a duplicate key on a column prefix of a CHAR column. This is a regression from Bug#14729221 IN-PLACE ALTER TABLE REPORTS '' INSTEAD OF REAL DUPLICATE VALUE FOR PREFIX KEYS. The assertion is only present when UNIV_DEBUG is defined (which it is in debug builds starting from MySQL 5.5). It is a case of overasserting. Fix approved by Inaam Rana on IM.
-
- 21 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
Moved explicit instantiation of available_buffer and valid_buffer_range template functions to sql/log_event.cc.
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
Merge bundle on mysql-5.1.
-
- 19 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
- 18 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Neeraj Bisht authored
Problem:- When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a BLOB column,results a memory leak. Analysis:- In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects), so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is not deleted twice. The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches. One by Kostja : revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153 Fix the broken test suite in -debug build. and other by Oleksandr revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905 Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851). both of this patches are commited in different branch and while merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr patch handle this.
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG) This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL 5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support auto-increment columns. row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values, return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in row_search_max_autoinc(). rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains
-
- 17 Oct, 2012 4 commits
-
-
-
Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg authored
mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable $UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe. Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe, within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash with a fancy symlink). Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi (in perl). (backport)
-
Yasufumi Kinoshita authored
rb://1334 approved by: Inaam Rana
-
Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg authored
mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable $UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe. Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe, within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash with a fancy symlink). Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi (in perl).
-
- 16 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Neeraj Bisht authored
Problem:- using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed. Analysis:- last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values. In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result. Solution: When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value.
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
REAL DUPLICATE VALUE FOR PREFIX KEYS innobase_rec_to_mysql(): Invoke dict_index_get_nth_col_or_prefix_pos() instead of dict_index_get_nth_col_pos() to find the column.
-
- 15 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
bug#14704286 SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index) If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in. If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check for this condition. Added hook for this check. ----- Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
-
- 12 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Marc Alff authored
This fix resolves a security vulnerability of SHOW PROFILE. See the bug report for details.
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
This bug had two problems: P1) Reads out of bounds; P2) Writes out of bounds. PROBLEM P1 ---------- User_var_log_event unmarshalling from binlog was not performing range checks when using name_len and val_len variables to walk on event buffer. Added range checks to User_var_log_event unmarshalling to prevent unmarshalling errors. PROBLEM P2 ---------- User_var_log_event value was allocated on thread stack, what caused stack frame errors when User_var_log_event value was bigger than thread stack size. Currently value is allocated on heap memory.
-
- 10 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Vasil Dimov authored
os/os0file.c:1332: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
-
- 09 Oct, 2012 3 commits
-
-
Vasil Dimov authored
although the bug does not exist in 5.1/innodb.
-
Vasil Dimov authored
-
Vasil Dimov authored
The problem is in the error handling in row_create_table_for_mysql(). In the 'disk full' case we may forget to call dict_mem_table_free() on the table object. Approved by: Marko (rb:1377 and rb:1386)
-
- 08 Oct, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
We did not allocate enough bits for index->trx_id_offset, causing an UPDATE or DELETE of a table with a PRIMARY KEY longer than 1024 bytes to corrupt the PRIMARY KEY. dict_index_t: Allocate enough bits. dict_index_build_internal_clust(): Check for overflow of index->trx_id_offset. Trip a debug assertion when overflow occurs. rb:1380 approved by Jimmy Yang
-
- 01 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Tor Didriksen authored
n_child_sum_items kept increasing. Since it is used for calculating the size of ref_pointer_array, we will allocate larger and larger chunks of memory, until we hit some operating system limit. The memory is free()d at disconnect, but is most likely *not* returned to the operating system.
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
- 28 Sep, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
TRANSACTION ROLLBACK Description: During the rollback operation, a blob page is removed earlier than desired. Consider following scenario: 1. create table t1(a int primary key,b blob) engine=innodb; 2. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000)); 3. begin; 4. update t1 set b=concat(b,'b'); 5. update t1 set a=a+1; 6. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000)); 7. rollback; The update operation in line 5 produces 2 undo log record. The first undo record (TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC) goes to trx->update_undo and the second undo record (TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC) goes to trx->insert_undo. During rollback, they are executed out of order. When the undo record TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC is applied/executed, the blob ownership is also reset. Because of this the blob page is released earlier than desired. This blob page must have been freed only as part of applying/executing the undo record TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC. This problem can be avoided by executing the undo records in order. This patch will make innodb to execute the undo records in order. rb://1125 approved by Marko.
-
- 26 Sep, 2012 2 commits
-
-
mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
No commit message
-
Akhila Maddukuri authored
```-------- After compiling from source, during make test I got the following error: test main.loaddata failed with error CURRENT_TEST: main.loaddata mysqltest: At line 592: query 'LOAD DATA INFILE 'tmpp.txt' INTO TABLE t1 CHARACTER SET ucs2 (@b) SET a=REVERSE(@b)' failed: 1115: Unknown character set: 'ucs2' I noticed other tests are skipped because of no ucs2 main.mix2_myisam_ucs2 [ skipped ] Test requires:' have_ucs2' Should main.loaddata be skipped if there is no ucs2 How To Repeat: ``` ---------- Run make test on compiled source that doesn't have ucs2 Suggested fix: ------------- the failing piece of the test should be moved from mysql-test/t/loaddata.test to mysql-test/t/ctype_ucs.test.
-
- 25 Sep, 2012 5 commits
-
-
Tor Didriksen authored
Bug #11764313 57135: CRASH IN ITEM_FUNC_CASE::FIND_ITEM WITH CASE WHEN Bug #11764818 57692: Crash in item_func_in::val_int() with ZEROFILL
-
mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
No commit message
-
mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
No commit message
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
When a client connects to a MySQL server, first a THD object is created. If there are any idle server threads waiting, the THD object is then added to a list and a server thread is woken up. This thread then retrieves the THD object from the list and starts executing. The problem was that this list of THD objects waiting for a server thread, was not working in a FIFO fashion, but rather LIFO. This is unfair, as it means that the last THD added (=last client connected) will be assigned a server thread first. Note however that for this to be a problem, several clients must be able to connect and have THD objects constructed before any server threads manages to be woken up. This is not a very likely scenario. This patch fixes the problem by changing the THD list to work FIFO rather than LIFO. This is the 5.1/5.5 version of the patch.
-
Raghav Kapoor authored
BACKGROUND: In certain situations DROP USER fails to remove all privileges belonging to user being dropped from in-memory structures. Current workaround is to do DROP USER twice in scenario below OR doing FLUSH PRIVILEGES after doing DROP USER. ANALYSIS: In MySQL, When we grant some stored routines privileges to a user they are stored in their respective hash. When doing DROP USER all the stored routine privilege entries associated with that user has to be deleted from its respective hash. The root cause for this bug is some entries from the hash are not getting deleted. The problem is that code that deletes entries from the hash tries to do so while iterating over it, without taking enough measures to address the fact that such deletion can reshuffle elements in the hash. If the user/administrator creates the same user again he is thrown an error 'Error 1396 ER_CANNOT_USER' from MySQL. This prompts the user to either do FLUSH PRIVILEGES or do DROP USER again. This behaviour is not desirable as it is a workaround and does not solves the problem mentioned above. FIX: This bug is fixed by introducing a dynamic array to store the pointersto all stored routine privilege objects that either have to be deleted or updated. This is done in 3 steps. Step 1: Fetching the element from the hash and checking whether it is to be deleted or updated. Step 2: Storing the pointer to that privilege object in dynamic array. Step 3: Traversing the dynamic array to perform the appropriate action either delete or update. This is a much cleaner way to delete or update the privilege entries associated with some user and solves the problem mentioned above. Also the code has been refactored a bit by introducing an enum instead of hard coded numbers used for respective dynamic arrays and hashes in handle_grant_struct() function.
-