- 08 Dec, 2005 1 commit
-
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
to Crash": the bug was that due to non-standard name resolution precedence in stored procedures (See Bug#5967) a stored procedure variable took precedence over a table column when the arguments for VALUES() function were resolved. The implementation of VALUES() function was not designed to work with Item_splocal and crashed. VALUES() function is non-standard. It can refer to, and is meaningful for, table columns only. The patch disables SP variables as possible arguments of VALUES() function.
-
- 07 Dec, 2005 27 commits
-
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-merges
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-merges
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
-
anozdrin@mysql.com authored
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-merges
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-merges
-
jimw@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/jimw/my/mysql-5.0-release
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/opt/local/work/mysql-5.0-root
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-merges
-
anozdrin@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/alik/Documents/AllProgs/MySQL/devel/5.0-sp-vars-merge-2
-
anozdrin@mysql.com authored
according to the standard. The idea is to use Field-classes to implement stored routines variables. Also, we should provide facade to Item-hierarchy by Item_field class (it is necessary, since SRVs take part in expressions). The patch fixes the following bugs: - BUG#8702: Stored Procedures: No Error/Warning shown for inappropriate data type matching; - BUG#8768: Functions: For any unsigned data type, -ve values can be passed and returned; - BUG#8769: Functions: For Int datatypes, out of range values can be passed and returned; - BUG#9078: STORED PROCDURE: Decimal digits are not displayed when we use DECIMAL datatype; - BUG#9572: Stored procedures: variable type declarations ignored; - BUG#12903: upper function does not work inside a function; - BUG#13705: parameters to stored procedures are not verified; - BUG#13808: ENUM type stored procedure parameter accepts non-enumerated data; - BUG#13909: Varchar Stored Procedure Parameter always BINARY string (ignores CHARACTER SET); - BUG#14161: Stored procedure cannot retrieve bigint unsigned; - BUG#14188: BINARY variables have no 0x00 padding; - BUG#15148: Stored procedure variables accept non-scalar values;
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
current SP tables locking make impossible view security" with main tree.
-
knielsen@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/data0/mysqldev/my/mysql-5.0
-
knielsen@mysql.com authored
-
lenz@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/space/my/mysql-5.0
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-bg11555-2
-
lenz@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/space/my/mysql-5.0
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-bg11555-2
-
lenz@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/space/my/mysql-5.0-merg
-
dlenev@mysql.com authored
impossible view security". We should not expose names of tables which are explicitly or implicitly (via routine or trigger) used by view even if we find that they are missing. So during building of list of prelocked tables for statement we track which routines (and therefore tables for these routines) are used from views. We mark elements of LEX::routines set which correspond to routines used in views by setting Sroutine_hash_entry::belong_to_view member to point to TABLE_LIST object for topmost view which uses routine. We propagate this mark to all routines which are used by this routine and which we add to this set. We also mark tables used by such routine which we add to the list of tables for prelocking as belonging to this view.
-
serg@serg.mylan authored
-
timour@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/timka/mysql/src/5.0-2486
-
lenz@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/space/my/mysql-4.1
-
jimw@mysql.com authored
-
jimw@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/jimw/my/mysql-5.0-clean
-
- 06 Dec, 2005 12 commits
-
-
jimw@mysql.com authored
statement that generated a warning. (Bug #15510)
-
jimw@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/jimw/my/mysql-5.0-clean
-
konstantin@mysql.com authored
prepared statement execute
-
serg@serg.mylan authored
into serg.mylan:/usr/home/serg/Abk/mysql-5.0
-
aivanov@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/alexi/innodb-ss/mysql-5.0-ss52
-
aivanov@mysql.com authored
to crash". Changes from snapshot innodb-5.0-ss52. Note that buf_block_t::index should be protected by btr_search_latch or an s-latch or x-latch on the index page. btr_search_drop_page_hash_index(): Read block->index while holding btr_search_latch and use the cached value in the loop. Remove some redundant assertions. Also fix 13778. When FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0 we still need to check that datatypes between foreign key references are compatible. Also added test cases to 9802.
-
serg@serg.mylan authored
-
timour@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/timka/mysql/src/5.0-2486
-
pem@mysql.com authored
Changed variable type and added comment in sp.c.
-
lenz@mysql.com authored
internals@lists.mysql.com to reduce the noise on the internals list.
-
pem@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/usr/home/pem/bug14233/mysql-5.0
-
stewart@mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/stewart/Documents/MySQL/5.0/bug15512
-