1. 04 Oct, 2013 1 commit
  2. 27 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  3. 20 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  4. 12 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  5. 11 Sep, 2013 1 commit
    • Satya Bodapati's avatar
      Bug#16752251 - INNODB DOESN'T REDO-LOG INSERT BUFFER MERGE OPERATION IF · f166ec71
      Satya Bodapati authored
      	       IT IS DONE IN-PLACE
      
      With change buffer enabled, InnoDB doesn't write a transaction log
      record when it merges a record from the insert buffer to an secondary
      index page if the insertion is performed as an update-in-place.
      
      Fixed by logging the 'update-in-place' operation on secondary index
      pages.
      
      Approved by Marko. rb#2429
      f166ec71
  6. 10 Sep, 2013 3 commits
    • mithun's avatar
      Bug #16978278 : BUFFER OVERFLOW WHEN PRINTING A LARGE 64-BIT INTEGER · d88c01d3
      mithun authored
                      WITH MY_B_VPRINTF()
      Issue         : In LP 64 machine max long value can be 20 digit
                      decimal value. But in my_b_vprintf() the intermediate
                      buffer storage used is 17 bytes length. This will lead to
                      buffer overflow.
      Solution      : Increased the buffer storage from 17 to 32 bytes.
                      code is backported from 5.6
      d88c01d3
    • Libing Song's avatar
      Bug#17402313 DUMP THREAD SENDS SOME EVENTS MORE THAN ONCE · 9e91f479
      Libing Song authored
      Postfix, suppress the new warning generated by the bug's fix.
      9e91f479
    • Libing Song's avatar
      Bug#17402313 DUMP THREAD SENDS SOME EVENTS MORE THAN ONCE · d5fdf9ef
      Libing Song authored
      Dump thread may encounter an error when reading events from the active binlog
      file. However the errors may be temporary, so dump thread will try to read
      the event again. But dump thread seeked to an wrong position, it caused some
      events was sent twice.
      
      To fix the bug, prev_pos is defined out the while loop and is set the correct
      position after reading every event correctly.
      
      This patch also make binlog_can_be_corrupted more accurate, only the binlogs
      not closed normally are marked binlog_can_be_corrupted.
      
      Finally, two warnings are added when dump threads encounter the temporary
      errors.
      d5fdf9ef
  7. 09 Sep, 2013 3 commits
  8. 03 Sep, 2013 1 commit
  9. 30 Aug, 2013 2 commits
  10. 29 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  11. 28 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Raghav Kapoor's avatar
      BUG#17294150-POTENTIAL CRASH DUE TO BUFFER OVERRUN IN SSL · c53cad81
      Raghav Kapoor authored
                   ERROR HANDLING CODE 
      
      BACKGROUND:
      There can be a potential crash due to buffer overrun in 
      SSL error handling code due to missing comma in
      ssl_error_string[] array in viosslfactories.c.
      
      ANALYSIS:
      Found by code Inspection.
      
      FIX:
      Added the missing comma in SSL error handling code
      in ssl_error_string[] array in viosslfactories.c.
      c53cad81
  12. 26 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  13. 23 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#17029399 - CRASH IN ITEM_REF::FIX_FIELDS WITH TRIGGER ERRORS · 4f0e7c03
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      In a Procedure, when we are comparing value of select query 
      with IN clause and they both have different collation, cause 
      error on first time execution and assert second time.
      procedure will have query like
      set @x = ((select a from t1) in (select d from t2));<---proc1
                    sel1                   sel2
      
      Analysis:-
      When we execute this proc1(first time)
      While resolving the fields of user variable, we will call 
      Item_in_subselect::fix_fields while will resolve sel2. There 
      in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer, we evaluate the 
      left expression(sel1) and store it in Item_cache_* object 
      (to avoid re-evaluating it many times during subquery execution) 
      by making Item_in_optimizer class.
      While evaluating left expression we will prepare sel1.
      After that, we will put a new condition in sel2  
      in Item_in_subselect::select_transformer() which will compare 
      t2.d and sel1(which is cached in Item_in_optimizer).
      
      Later while checking the collation in agg_item_collations() 
      we get error and we cleanup the item. While cleaning up we cleaned 
      the cached value in Item_in_optimizer object.
      
      When we execute the procedure second time, we have condition for 
      sel2 and while setup_cond(), we can't able to find reference item 
      as it is cleanup while item cleanup.So it assert.
      
      
      Solution:-
      We should not cleanup the cached value for Item_in_optimizer object, 
      if we have put the condition to subselect.
      
      4f0e7c03
  14. 21 Aug, 2013 4 commits
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge working copy to mysql-5.1. · 36db646f
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      36db646f
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge mysql-5.1 to working copy. · 2e7ef2cb
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      2e7ef2cb
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#12560151 61132: infinite loop in buf_page_get_gen() when handling · 6a3bb3c0
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      compressed pages
      
      After loading a compressed-only page in buf_page_get_gen() we allocate a new
      block for decompression. The problem is that the compressed page is neither
      buffer-fixed nor I/O-fixed by the time we call buf_LRU_get_free_block(),
      so it may end up being evicted and returned back as a new block.
      
      buf_page_get_gen(): Temporarily buffer-fix the compressed-only block
      while allocating memory for an uncompressed page frame.
      This should prevent this form of the infinite loop, which is more likely
      with a small innodb_buffer_pool_size.
      
      rb#2511 approved by Jimmy Yang, Sunny Bains
      6a3bb3c0
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      Bug#11765252 - READ OF FREED MEMORY WHEN "USE DB" AND · 10a6aa25
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
                     "SHOW PROCESSLIST"
      
      Analysis:
      ----------
      The problem here is, if one connection changes its
      default db and at the same time another connection executes
      "SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
      connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
      memory. 
      
      The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
      DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
      So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
      thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
      and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
      reported here.
      
      Fix:
      ----------
      Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
      and while copying it to processlist.
      10a6aa25
  15. 16 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#17312846 CHECK TABLE ASSERTION FAILURE · 55129f67
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      DICT_TABLE_GET_FORMAT(CLUST_INDEX->TABLE) >= 1
      
      The function row_sel_sec_rec_is_for_clust_rec() was incorrectly
      preparing to compare a NULL column prefix in a secondary index with a
      non-NULL column in a clustered index.
      
      This can trigger an assertion failure in 5.1 plugin and later. In the
      built-in InnoDB of MySQL 5.1 and earlier, we would apparently only do
      some extra work, by trimming the clustered index field for the
      comparison.
      
      The code might actually have worked properly apart from this debug
      assertion failure. It is merely doing some extra work in fetching a
      BLOB column, and then comparing it to NULL (which would return the
      same result, no matter what the BLOB contents is).
      
      While the test case involves CHECK TABLE, this could theoretically
      occur during any read that uses a secondary index on a column prefix
      of a column that can be NULL.
      
      rb#3101 approved by Mattias Jonsson
      55129f67
  16. 15 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#17302896 DOUBLE PURGE ON ROLLBACK OF UPDATING A DELETE-MARKED RECORD · 5163c4a1
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      There was a race condition in the rollback of TRX_UNDO_UPD_DEL_REC.
      
      Once row_undo_mod_clust() has rolled back the changes by the rolling-back
      transaction, it attempts to purge the delete-marked record, if possible, in a
      separate mini-transaction.
      
      However, row_undo_mod_remove_clust_low() fails to check if the DB_TRX_ID of
      the record that it found after repositioning the cursor, is still the same.
      If it is not, it means that the record was purged and another record was
      inserted in its place.
      
      So, the rollback would have performed an incorrect purge, breaking the
      locking rules and causing corruption.
      
      The problem was found by creating a table that contains a unique
      secondary index and a primary key, and two threads running REPLACE
      with only one value for the unique column, so that the uniqueness
      constraint would be violated all the time, leading to statement
      rollback.
      
      This bug exists in all InnoDB versions (I checked MySQL 3.23.53).
      It has become easier to repeat in 5.5 and 5.6 thanks to scalability
      improvements and a dedicated purge thread.
      
      rb#3085 approved by Jimmy Yang
      5163c4a1
  17. 14 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#16971045 ASSERTION FAILURES ON ROLLBACK OF AN INSERT AFTER A · 84b2f38d
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      FAILED BLOB WRITE
      
      btr_store_big_rec_extern_fields(): Relax a debug assertion so that
      some BLOB pointers may remain zero if an error occurs.
      
      btr_free_externally_stored_field(), row_undo_ins(): Allow the BLOB
      pointer to be zero on any rollback.
      
      rb#3059 approved by Jimmy Yang, Kevin Lewis
      84b2f38d
  18. 12 Aug, 2013 1 commit
    • Anirudh Mangipudi's avatar
      Bug #16776528 RACE CONDITION CAN CAUSE MYSQLD TO REMOVE SOCKET FILE ERRANTLY · 8977c8fa
      Anirudh Mangipudi authored
      Problem Description:
      A mysqld_safe instance is started. An InnoDB crash recovery begins which takes
      few seconds to complete. During this crash recovery process happening, another
      mysqld_safe instance is started with the same server startup parameters. Since
      the mysqld's pid file is absent during the crash recovery process the second
      instance assumes there is no other process and tries to acquire a lock on the
      ibdata files in the datadir.  But this step fails and the 2nd instance keeps 
      retrying 100 times each with a delay of 1 second. Now after the 100 attempts, 
      the server goes down, but while going down it hits the mysqld_safe script's 
      cleanup section and without any check it blindly deletes the socket and pid 
      files. Since no lock is placed on the socket file, it gets deleted.
      
      Solution:
      We create a mysqld_safe.pid file in the datadir, which protects the presence 
      server instance resources by storing the mysqld_safe's process id in it. We
      place a check if the mysqld_safe.pid file is existing in the datadir. If yes
      then we check if the pid it contains is an active pid or not. If yes again,
      then the scripts logs an error saying "A mysqld_safe instance is already 
      running". Otherwise it will log the present mysqld_safe's pid into the 
      mysqld_safe.pid file.
      8977c8fa
  19. 31 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • Joao Gramacho's avatar
      Bug#16997513 MY_STRTOLL10 ACCEPTING OVERFLOWED UNSIGNED LONG LONG VALUES AS NORMAL ONES · be9dcdf9
      Joao Gramacho authored
      Problem:
      =======
      It was detected an incorrect behavior of my_strtoll10 function when 
      converting strings with numbers in the following format:
      "184467440XXXXXXXXXYY"
      
      Where XXXXXXXXX > 737095516 and YY <= 15
      
      Samples of problematic numbers:
      "18446744073709551915"
      "18446744073709552001"
      
      Instead of returning the larger unsigned long long value and setting overflow
      in the returned error code, my_strtoll10 function returns the lower 64-bits 
      of the evaluated number and did not set overflow in the returned error code.
      
      Analysis:
      ========
      Once trying to fix bug 16820156, I've found this bug in the overflow check of
      my_strtoll10 function.
      
      This function, once receiving a string with an integer number larger than
      18446744073709551615 (the larger unsigned long long number) should return the
      larger unsigned long long number and set overflow in the returned error code.
      
      Because of a wrong overflow evaluation, the function didn't catch the
      overflow cases where (i == cutoff) && (j > cutoff2) && (k <= cutoff3). When
      the overflow evaluation fails, the function return the lower 64-bits of the
      evaluated number and do not set overflow in the returned error code.
      
      Fix:
      ===
      Corrected the overflow evaluation in my_strtoll10.
      be9dcdf9
  20. 30 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • prabakaran thirumalai's avatar
      Bug#17083851 BACKPORT BUG#11765744 TO 5.1, 5.5 AND 5.6 · d95e57a3
      prabakaran thirumalai authored
      Description:
      Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
      to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on 
      LOCK_status mutex.  
      On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe. 
      Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
      Windows version, do not support recursion according to their 
      documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock, 
      which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
      recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
      if there are concurrent lock requests.
      
      Fix:  
      This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
      read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
      LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using 
      counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter 
      fill_status() function first time. 
      d95e57a3
  21. 29 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#13417564 SKIP SLEEP IN SRV_MASTER_THREAD WHEN · f7940e40
      Aditya A authored
                   SHUTDOWN IS IN PROGRESS 
      
      PROBLEM
      -------
       In the background thread srv_master_thread() we have a 
       a one second delay loop which will continuously monitor
       server activity .If the server is inactive (with out any
       user activity) or in a shutdown state we do some background
       activity like flushing the changes.In the current code
       we are not checking if server is in shutdown state before
       sleeping for one second.
      
      FIX
      ---
      If server is in shutdown state ,then dont go to one second
      sleep. 
      f7940e40
  22. 25 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Bug #17076737 DUPLICATE CONSTRAINTS DISPLAYED WHEN NAME INCLUDES "_IBFK_" · 0c1ca4f0
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      Problem:
      
      When the user specified foreign key name contains "_ibfk_", InnoDB wrongly
      tries to rename it. 
      
      Solution:
      
      When a table is renamed, all its associated foreign keys will also be renamed,
      only if the foreign key names are automatically generated.  If the foreign key
      names are given by the user, even if it has _ibfk_ in it, it must not be
      renamed.
      
      rb#2935 approved by Jimmy, Krunal and Satya
      
      0c1ca4f0
  23. 23 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • Astha Pareek's avatar
      BUG#16295518 - SYS_VARS.RPL_INIT_SLAVE_FUNC IS FAILING ON MYSQL-5.1 · b0689421
      Astha Pareek authored
      BUG#12535301- SYS_VARS.RPL_INIT_SLAVE_FUNC MISMATCHES IN DAILY-5.5 
      
      Problem:
      sys_vars.rpl_init_slave_func test was not recorded after
      the last edit. It was disabled on 5.1 after seeing failures
      due to the above reason.
      No old failures as this suite never ran with pb2 on 5.1
      
      Fix:
      Added assert condition after wait for checks.
      Recorded test and enabled it.
      b0689421
  24. 18 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • Nisha Gopalakrishnan's avatar
      BUG#15844882: MYSQLDUMP FROM 5.5 FAILS WITH AN ERROR WHEN TRYING · 5d74d07b
      Nisha Gopalakrishnan authored
                    TO DUMP DATA FROM MYSQL-5.6
      
      Analysis
      --------
      Dumping mysql-5.6 data using mysql-5.1/mysql-5.5 'myqldump'
      utility fails with a syntax error.
      
      Server system variable 'sql_quote_show_create' which quotes the
      identifiers is set in the mysqldump utility. The mysldump utility
      of mysql-5.1/mysql-5.5 uses deprecated syntax 'SET OPTION' to set
      the 'sql_quote_show_create' option. The support for the syntax is
      removed in mysql-5.6. Hence syntax error is reported while taking
      the dump.
      
      Fix:
      ---
      Changed the 'mysqldump' code to use the syntax
      'SET SQL_QUOTE_SHOW_CREATE' to set the 'sql_quote_show_create'
      option. That syntax is supported on mysql-5.1, mysql-5.5 and
      mysql-5.6.
      
      NOTE: I have not added an mtr test case since it is difficult
      to simulate the condition. Also the syntax may not be further
      simplified in the future.
      5d74d07b
  25. 17 Jul, 2013 1 commit
  26. 09 Jul, 2013 1 commit
  27. 01 Jul, 2013 1 commit
  28. 19 Jun, 2013 1 commit
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#11829813 UNUSED MUTEX COMMIT_THREADS_M · dc696126
      Aditya A authored
      Analysis
      --------
      The pthread_mutex commit_threads_m was initiliazed but never
      used. 
      
      Fix
      ---
      Removing the commit_threads_m mutex from the code base.
      
      [ Approved by Marko rb#2475]
      dc696126
  29. 18 Jun, 2013 1 commit
  30. 14 Jun, 2013 2 commits
    • mysql-builder@oracle.com's avatar
      No commit message · 489215ae
      mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
      No commit message
      489215ae
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#13548704 ALGORITHM USED FOR DROPPING PARTITIONED TABLE CAN LEAD · 5f3c0a45
      Aditya A authored
                   TO INCONSISTENCY 
      
      PROBLEM
      --------
      When we drop a partitoned table , we first gather the
      information about partitions in the table from the 
      table_name.par file and store it in an internal data 
      structure.Then we delete this file and the data in 
      the table. If the server crashes  after deleting the
      file,then after recovering we cannot access the table
      .Even we cannot drop the table ,because drop algorithm
      requires par file to read the partition information.
      
      
      FIX
      ---
      1. We move the part of deleting par file after deleting 
         all the table data from the storage egine.
      2. During drop operation if we detect that the par 
         file is missing then we delete the .frm file,since 
         there is no way of recovering without par file.
        
      [Approved by Mattias rb#2576 ]   
      5f3c0a45
  31. 10 Jun, 2013 1 commit