- 06 Feb, 2009 1 commit
-
-
Mats Kindahl authored
TRUNCATE TABLE fails to replicate when stmt-based binlogging is not supported. There were two separate problems with the code, both of which are fixed with this patch: 1. An error was printed by InnoDB for TRUNCATE TABLE in statement mode when the in isolation levels READ COMMITTED and READ UNCOMMITTED since InnoDB does permit statement-based replication for DML statements. However, the TRUNCATE TABLE is not transactional, but is a DDL, and should therefore be allowed to be replicated as a statement. 2. The statement was not logged in mixed mode because of the error above, but the error was not reported to the client. This patch fixes the problem by treating TRUNCATE TABLE a DDL, that is, it is always logged as a statement and not reporting an error from InnoDB for TRUNCATE TABLE.
-
- 16 Jan, 2009 10 commits
-
-
Timothy Smith authored
-
Timothy Smith authored
-
Timothy Smith authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
- 15 Jan, 2009 17 commits
-
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
This does not bring any contents changes, it is purely metadata which are affected. Details: Even within 5.0, most of these changesets did not cause file contents changes, because they were backports done for the "service pack" builds of 5.0.66sp1 and 5.0.72sp1. The "real" changesets are also already present in 5.1, so this upmerge doesn't change any contents. The only "real" changeset in 5.0 was a fix of the shell scripts used to configure bdb (BerkeleyDB). As we completele removed bdb from the 5.1 sources already, the affected files are not present in the 5.1 source tree, so this changeset also does not cause any contents changes.
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
this should not happen.
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
kent.boortz@sun.com authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Davi Arnaut authored
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
This is not the final merge of that release build, but we need early access to these tool fixes (use of "awk" in the BDB configuration).
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
Davi Arnaut authored
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
-
Davi Arnaut authored
-
Alexander Nozdrin authored
with mysql_change_user) to 5.0.
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
Georgi Kodinov authored
-
- 14 Jan, 2009 8 commits
-
-
MySQL Build Team authored
-
Ramil Kalimullin authored
Post-fix test failure: fixed mysqlcheck.test on Windows platforms.
-
timothy.smith@sun.com authored
-
Chad MILLER authored
-
Timothy Smith authored
-
Ramil Kalimullin authored
bug#33094: Error in upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1 when table contains triggers and #41385: Crash when attempting to repair a #mysql50# upgraded table with triggers. Problem: 1. trigger code didn't assume a table name may have a "#mysql50#" prefix, that may lead to a failing ASSERT(). 2. "ALTER DATABASE ... UPGRADE DATA DIRECTORY NAME" failed for databases with "#mysql50#" prefix if any trigger. 3. mysqlcheck --fix-table-name didn't use UTF8 as a default character set that resulted in (parsing) errors for tables with non-latin symbols in their names and definitions of triggers. Fix: 1. properly handle table/database names with "#mysql50#" prefix. 2. handle --default-character-set mysqlcheck option; if mysqlcheck is launched with --fix-table-name or --fix-db-name set default character set to UTF8 if no --default-character-set option given. Note: if given --fix-table-name or --fix-db-name option, without --default-character-set mysqlcheck option default character set is UTF8.
-
He Zhenxing authored
-
He Zhenxing authored
The next number (AUTO_INCREMENT) field of the table for write rows events are not initialized, and cause some engines (innodb) not correctly update the tables's auto_increment value. This patch fixed this problem by honor next number fields if present.
-
- 13 Jan, 2009 4 commits
-
-
Timothy Smith authored
Use SELECT FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA instead of SHOW VARIABLES LIKE to restrict values correctly.
-
Timothy Smith authored
partition_innodb_semi_consistent.test, which was overlooked in the innodb-5.1-ss3603 snapshot.
-
Davi Arnaut authored
The problem is that the query cache stores packets containing the server status of the time when the cached statement was run. This might lead to a wrong transaction status in the client side if a statement is cached during a transaction and is later served outside a transaction context (and vice-versa). The solution is to take into account the transaction status when storing in and serving from the query cache.
-
Chad MILLER authored
-