1. 08 Apr, 2009 2 commits
    • Alfranio Correia's avatar
      BUG#39393. Post-fix for test rpl_skip_error. · fb5bc0a3
      Alfranio Correia authored
      The result set for multi-row statements is not the same between STMT and
      RBR and among different versions. Thus to avoid test failures, we are not
      printing out such result sets. Note, however, that this does not have
      impact on coverage and accuracy since the execution is able to continue
      without further issues when an error is found on the master and such error
      is set to be skipped.
      fb5bc0a3
    • Alfranio Correia's avatar
      43e85ece
  2. 07 Apr, 2009 4 commits
  3. 06 Apr, 2009 2 commits
  4. 05 Apr, 2009 1 commit
    • Alfranio Correia's avatar
      BUG#39393 slave-skip-errors does not work when using ROW based replication · f9338b31
      Alfranio Correia authored
                                    
      RBR was not considering the option --slave-skip-errors.
                                    
      To fix the problem, we are reporting the ignored ERROR(s) as warnings thus avoiding 
      stopping the SQL Thread. Besides, it fixes the output of "SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 
      'slave_skip_errors'" which was showing nothing when the value "all" was assigned 
      to --slave-skip-errors.
                        
      @sql/log_event.cc
        skipped rbr errors when the option skip-slave-errors is set.
      @sql/slave.cc
        fixed the output of for SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'slave_skip_errors'"
      @test-cases
        fixed the output of rpl.rpl_idempotency
        updated the test case rpl_skip_error
      f9338b31
  5. 03 Apr, 2009 6 commits
    • Serge Kozlov's avatar
      Bug#37716. · a81e21f8
      Serge Kozlov authored
      1. Test case was rewritten completely.
      2. Test covers 3 cases:
       a) do deadlock on slave, wait retries of transaction, unlock slave before lock
      timeout;
       b) do deadlock on slave and wait error 'lock timeout exceed' on slave;
       c) same as b) but if of max relay log size = 0;
      3. Added comments inline.
      4. Updated result file.
      a81e21f8
    • Davi Arnaut's avatar
      Merge Bug#43230 into mysql-5.1-bugteam · 54bf80b6
      Davi Arnaut authored
      54bf80b6
    • Davi Arnaut's avatar
      Bug#43230: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE can hang with FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK indefinitely · 72e97882
      Davi Arnaut authored
      The problem is that a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE statement might open
      a table and later wait for a impeding global read lock without
      noticing whether it is holding a table that is being waited upon
      the the flush phase of the process that took the global read
      lock.
      
      The same problem also affected the following statements:
      
      LOCK TABLES .. WRITE
      UPDATE .. SET (update and multi-table update)
      TRUNCATE TABLE ..
      LOAD DATA ..
      
      The solution is to make the above statements wait for a impending
      global read lock before opening the tables. If there is no
      impending global read lock, the statement raises a temporary
      protection against global read locks and progresses smoothly
      towards completion.
      
      Important notice: the patch does not try to address all possible
      cases, only those which are common and can be fixed unintrusively
      enough for 5.0.
      
      mysql-test/r/lock_multi.result:
        Add test case result for Bug#43230
      mysql-test/t/lock_multi.test:
        Add test case for Bug#43230
      sql/sql_lex.cc:
        Initialize flag.
      sql/sql_lex.h:
        Add a flag to the lexer.
      sql/sql_parse.cc:
        Wait for the global read lock is a write lock is going to be
        taken. The wait is done before opening tables.
      sql/sql_yacc.yy:
        Protect against the GRL if its a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE or LOCK TABLES
        .. WRITE statement.
      72e97882
    • Guangbao Ni's avatar
      AutoMerged from pushbuild mysql-5.1-bugteam · 102de8f5
      Guangbao Ni authored
      102de8f5
    • Guangbao Ni's avatar
      BUG#42640 mysqld crashes when unsafe statements are executed (STRICT_TRANS_TABLESmode) · 173d2953
      Guangbao Ni authored
      Mysql server crashes because unsafe statements warning is wrongly elevated to error,
      which is set the error status of Diagnostics_area of the thread in THD::binlog_query().
      Yet the caller believes that binary logging shouldn't touch the status, so it will
      set the status also later by my_ok(), my_error() or my_message() seperately
      according to the execution result of the statement or transaction.
      But the status of Diagnostics_area of the thread is allowed to set only once.
      
      Fixed to clear the error wrongly set by binary logging, but keep the warning message.
      
      mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_ps.result:
        Change unsafe warning to NOTE level
      mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_unsafe.result:
        Test case result for unsafe statements to ensure mysql sever don't crash
      mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_unsafe.test:
        Test case for unsafe statements to ensure mysql sever don't crash
      mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_skip_error.result:
        Change unsafe warning to NOTE level
      mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_loadfile.result:
        Change unsafe warning to NOTE level
      mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_udf.result:
        Change unsafe warning to NOTE level
      sql/sql_class.cc:
        the error status of the thread is cleared When a warning is elevated to an error
        because of unsafe warning of binary log.
      173d2953
    • Horst Hunger's avatar
      Fix belonging to bug#42838: Though this bug is only for 6.0 I put in some... · 92ea1722
      Horst Hunger authored
      Fix belonging to bug#42838: Though this bug is only for 6.0 I put in some updated result files for 6.0 and this are the corrsponding resul files for 5.1, so that sys_vars should then run successfully also in 5.1.
      92ea1722
  6. 02 Apr, 2009 10 commits
  7. 01 Apr, 2009 15 commits