- 20 Sep, 2017 2 commits
- 19 Sep, 2017 5 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
200μs of NEO/go without sha1 case is still questionable: T(transmit request) = 10μs (deco rx throttle) + t(link-tx-request) T(transmit answer) = 10μs·4.5 (~ 4.5 KB answer for 4K ZData) + teco.rx-delay (= 3μs ?) || vv T(link) ~= 60μs T(teco-local,no-sha1,NEO/go) was ~= 100μs (see time-sep17-teco.txt) T(deco-local,no-sha1,NEO/go) was ~= 20μs (see time-sep17-deco.txt) || vv T(teco-deco,no-sha1,NEO/go) = 100μs/2 + 20μs/2 = 60μs ? if so RTT(getobject) should be 60+60 = 120μs but we have 200μs.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 18 Sep, 2017 22 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Something is wrong with the network: ping latency is 110μs but go-go time is ~ 360μs which is not the same as 110 + 100 (go-go time on teco; on deco it is 30 and it should be even less: 100/2 + 30/2). Will investigate.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 17 Sep, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 15 Sep, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
With some care it is possible for serveRecv to put itself to pause and handoff execution to goroutine for which a packet arrived. See comments in serveRecv about how it is done. For BenchmarkTCPlosr cuts RTT 12.5μs -> 6.6μs .
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 14 Sep, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
BenchmarkSyncChanRTT-4 5000000 350 ns/op BenchmarkBufChanRTT-4 5000000 352 ns/op BenchmarkBufChanAXRXRTT-4 3000000 407 ns/op BenchmarkNetPipeRTT-4 2000000 938 ns/op BenchmarkNetPipeRTTsr-4 1000000 1594 ns/op <-- here BenchmarkTCPlo-4 300000 4814 ns/op BenchmarkTCPlosr-4 100000 12261 ns/op <-- here BenchmarkLinkNetPipeRTT-4 500000 3017 ns/op BenchmarkLinkTCPRTT-4 100000 15650 ns/op the δ beetwen TCPlo + serveRecv style RX and full link over TCPlo is ~ 3μs. -> need to find out why TCPlosr = TCPlo + 8μs
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
without runtime.Gosched null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=536.560158ms (31.569µs / object) x=zsha1.go null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=532.416867ms (31.326µs / object) x=zsha1.go null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=536.958977ms (31.593µs / object) x=zsha1.go null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=534.170594ms (31.429µs / object) x=zsha1.go with runtime.Gosched null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=594.966346ms (35.006µs / object) x=zsha1.go null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=597.510359ms (35.155µs / object) x=zsha1.go null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=598.251026ms (35.199µs / object) x=zsha1.go null:00 ; oid=0..16995 nread=68269354 t=596.02138ms (35.068µs / object) x=zsha1.go ---- -> trace shows runtime.Gosched indeed switches to woken up G without second syscall in serveRecv but serveRecv migrates to different M (so different CPU)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
LinkNetPipeRTT-4 3.05µs ± 1% 2.99µs ± 0% -2.05% (p=0.008 n=5+5) LinkTCPRTT-4 15.9µs ± 1% 14.3µs ± 2% -10.11% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
-