Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
W
wendelin.core
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Labels
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Commits
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
wendelin.core
Commits
2de41552
Commit
2de41552
authored
Jun 26, 2019
by
Kirill Smelkov
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
.
parent
53b681e3
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
44 additions
and
25 deletions
+44
-25
wcfs/wcfs_test.py
wcfs/wcfs_test.py
+44
-25
No files found.
wcfs/wcfs_test.py
View file @
2de41552
...
...
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ from golang import go, chan, select, func, defer
from
golang
import
context
,
sync
,
time
from
golang.gcompat
import
qq
from
zodbtools.util
import
ashex
as
h
,
fromhex
from
pytest
import
raises
,
mark
import
pytest
;
xfail
=
pytest
.
mark
.
xfail
from
pytest
import
raises
,
fail
from
six
import
reraise
from
.internal
import
mm
from
.internal.wcfs_test
import
read_nogil
,
install_sigbus_trap
,
fadvise_dontneed
...
...
@@ -166,7 +167,7 @@ class DFile:
# tDB provides database/wcfs testing environment.
#
# Database root and wcfs connection are represented by .root and .wc correspondingly.
# The database is initialized with one ZBigFile created
(XXX .zfile)
# The database is initialized with one ZBigFile created
and opened via ZODB connection as .zfile .
#
# The primary way to access wcfs is by opening BigFiles and WatchLinks.
# A BigFile opened under tDB is represented as tFile - see .open for details.
...
...
@@ -791,14 +792,7 @@ class tWatchLink:
#
# only 1 sendReq must be used at a time. # XXX relax?
def
sendReq
(
t
,
ctx
,
req
):
# reply | None when EOF
stream
=
1
rxq
=
chan
()
with
t
.
_rxmu
:
assert
stream
not
in
t
.
_rxtab
t
.
_rxtab
[
stream
]
=
rxq
t
.
_send
(
stream
,
req
)
rxq
=
t
.
_sendReq
(
ctx
,
req
)
_
,
_rx
=
select
(
ctx
.
done
().
recv
,
# 0
...
...
@@ -808,6 +802,17 @@ class tWatchLink:
raise
ctx
.
err
()
return
_rx
def
_sendReq
(
t
,
ctx
,
req
):
# -> rxq
stream
=
1
rxq
=
chan
()
with
t
.
_rxmu
:
assert
stream
not
in
t
.
_rxtab
t
.
_rxtab
[
stream
]
=
rxq
t
.
_send
(
stream
,
req
)
return
rxq
# recvReq receives client <- server request.
#
# multiple recvReq could be used at a time.
...
...
@@ -918,7 +923,7 @@ def watch(twlink, zf, at, pinok=None): # -> tWatch
# blk ∉ pin_prev, blk ∈ pin -> cannot happen, except on first start
if
blk
not
in
pin_prev
and
blk
in
pin
:
if
at_prev
is
not
None
:
assert
False
,
'#%d pinned %s; not pinned %s'
%
(
t
.
hat
(
at_prev
),
t
.
hat
(
at
))
fail
(
'#%d pinned %s; not pinned %s'
%
(
t
.
hat
(
at_prev
),
t
.
hat
(
at
)
))
# blk ∈ pin -> blk is tracked; has rev > at
# (see criteria in _pinnedAt)
...
...
@@ -1043,7 +1048,7 @@ def doCheckingPin(f, pinokByWLink, pinfunc=None): # -> []event(str)
for
p
in
pinv
:
assert
w
.
foid
==
p
.
foid
if
p
.
at
is
None
:
# unpin to @head
assert
p
.
blk
in
w
.
pinned
# must have been pinned before
XXX correct?
assert
p
.
blk
in
w
.
pinned
# must have been pinned before
del
w
.
pinned
[
p
.
blk
]
else
:
w
.
pinned
[
p
.
blk
]
=
p
.
at
...
...
@@ -1058,7 +1063,7 @@ def doCheckingPin(f, pinokByWLink, pinfunc=None): # -> []event(str)
return
# cancel is expected after f completes
reraise
(
e
,
None
,
e
.
__traceback__
)
assert
False
,
"extra pin message received: %r"
%
req
.
msg
fail
(
"extra pin message received: %r"
%
req
.
msg
)
wg
.
go
(
_
,
wlink
,
zf
,
pinok
)
def
_
(
ctx
):
...
...
@@ -1266,9 +1271,8 @@ def test_wcfs_basic():
# verify how wcfs processes ZODB invalidations when hole becomes a block with data.
# XXX currently fails (needs δbtree)
# TODO merge into test_wcfs_basic & watch tests after δbtree is done
@
mark
.
xfail
@
xfail
# δbtree
@
func
def
test_wcfs_basic_hole2zblk
():
t
=
tDB
();
zf
=
t
.
zfile
...
...
@@ -1354,37 +1358,52 @@ def test_wcfs_watch_robust():
# verify that wcfs kills slow/faulty client who does not reply to pin in time.
# XXX place -> after normal tests? (yes, seems better - together with watch_robust)
@
xfail
# protection against faulty/slow clients
@
func
def
test_wcfs_pintimeout_kill
():
t
=
tDB
();
zf
=
t
.
zfile
# XXX wcfs arg: lower kill timeout
# adjusted wcfs timeout to kill client who is stuck not providing pin reply
tkill
=
3
*
time
.
second
t
=
tDB
();
zf
=
t
.
zfile
# XXX wcfs args += tkill
defer
(
t
.
close
)
# XXX move into subprocess not to kill whole testing
at1
=
t
.
commit
(
zf
,
{
2
:
'c1'
})
at2
=
t
.
commit
(
zf
,
{
2
:
'c2'
})
f
=
t
.
open
(
zf
)
f
.
assertData
([
''
,
''
,
'c2'
])
# XXX move into subprocess not to kill whole testing
ctx
,
_
=
context
.
with_timeout
(
context
.
background
(),
2
*
tkill
)
wl
=
t
.
openwatch
()
wg
=
sync
.
WorkGroup
(
XXX
)
wg
=
sync
.
WorkGroup
(
ctx
)
def
_
(
ctx
):
# XXX assert?
wl
.
sendReq
(
ctx
,
b"watch %s @%s"
%
(
h
(
zf
.
_p_oid
),
h
(
at1
)))
# send watch. The pin handler won't be replying -> we should never get reply here.
rxq
=
wl
.
_sendReq
(
ctx
,
b"watch %s @%s"
%
(
h
(
zf
.
_p_oid
),
h
(
at1
)))
_
,
_rx
=
select
(
ctx
.
done
().
recv
,
# 0
rxq
.
recv
,
# 1
)
if
_
==
0
:
raise
ctx
.
err
()
fail
(
"watch request completed (should not as pin handler is stuck)"
)
wg
.
go
(
_
)
def
_
(
ctx
):
req
=
wl
.
recvReq
(
ctx
)
assert
req
is
not
None
assert
req
.
msg
==
b"pin %s #%d @%s"
%
(
h
(
zf
.
_p_oid
),
2
,
h
(
at1
))
# XXX sleep > wcfs pin timeout - wcfs must kill us
assert
False
,
"wcfs did not killed stuck client"
# sleep > wcfs pin timeout - wcfs must kill us
_
,
_rx
=
select
(
ctx
.
done
().
recv
,
# 0
time
.
after
(
tkill
).
recv
,
# 1
)
if
_
==
0
:
raise
ctx
.
err
()
fail
(
"wcfs did not killed stuck client"
)
wg
.
go
(
_
)
wg
.
wait
()
# verify that watch setup/update sends correct pins.
@
func
def
test_wcfs_watch_setup
():
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment