An error occurred fetching the project authors.
- 19 Jul, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Leonardo Rochael Almeida authored
Only prevent transition from running if it has actually run. If its guard prevents it from running, consider it still runnable in this transaction. This change doesn't help to skip the interaction on the real object if it's not forbidden on the temp one.
-
- 14 Feb, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Nicolas Dumazet authored
It happened sometime, with aq_dynamic, when a setter was overriden on the class itself, that setFoo was called on a edit(foo=bar), as class methods were taking priority over aq_dynamic-generated-setters. Now, the correct behavior is back: edit(foo=bar) calls the private setter directly, and never the public setter. See "Workflow triggers and edit/_edit calling (or not) private or public setters" email for reference. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@43304 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 07 Feb, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@43108 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 29 Oct, 2010 1 commit
-
-
Nicolas Dumazet authored
This test checks that wrapping a method in an interaction workflow adds security to the wrapped method, but that it does not override existing (class) security definition. To do so, a private method (doSomethingStupid) is added on Organisation document class. We really want to change the (static) document class here, not the portal type class: before portal type classes changes, ERP5Type.Document.Organisation.Organisation was a copy of the document ERP5.Document.Organisation.Organisation. After portal classes, the former is a portal type class, and it does not make sense in test logic to add a method on the portal type class. It is correct to change the import path to access the physical Document class. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@39652 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 07 Jan, 2010 1 commit
-
-
Leonardo Rochael Almeida authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@31645 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 24 Nov, 2009 1 commit
-
-
Leonardo Rochael Almeida authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@30844 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 30 Oct, 2009 1 commit
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
* Replace direct access to some ERP5TypeInformation attributes by use of accessors: - base_category_list -> getTypeBaseCategoryList - property_sheet_list -> getTypePropertySheetList * Split Base.initializePortalTypeDynamicProperties to delegate some work to portal types (new 'updatePropertySheetDefinitionDict' method). git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@30159 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 09 Oct, 2009 1 commit
-
-
Nicolas Delaby authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@29516 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 01 Sep, 2009 1 commit
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
More generally, the 'security' attribute should not be used once the class is built, because the constructor of classes inherited from SimpleItem deletes it. This is currently tolerated in ERP5 because there is always CopyContainer that provides one, but it also means that CopyContainer.security is just a mix of attributes generated automatically on most classes. Previous code was equivalent to CopyContainer.security.declarePrivate('doSomethingStupid') CopyContainer.security.apply(Organisation) which is nonsense. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@28730 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 12 May, 2009 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@26926 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 15 Oct, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Nicolas Delaby authored
Add a test for this expected behaviour git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@24192 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 14 Oct, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Nicolas Delaby authored
this Executing Type allow to execute a interaction script at the end of transaction git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@24180 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 15 Apr, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@20510 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 29 Feb, 2008 1 commit
-
-
Alexandre Boeglin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@19615 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 14 Jan, 2008 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
information", unless we wrap a method that was already protected. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@18686 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
Jérome Perrin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@18685 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 29 Oct, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Yoshinori Okuji authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@17265 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 17 Sep, 2007 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
fix all undefined names in ERP5 unit tests, this was mostly due to the use of framework.py which we no longer use (runUnitTest does it for you) git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@16429 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
Jérome Perrin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@16424 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 31 Aug, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Jean-Paul Smets authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@15979 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 23 Mar, 2007 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Anyway, we should not rely on this behaviour when testing interaction workflows. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@13590 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 15 Sep, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Alexandre Boeglin authored
as modified by the user git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@9970 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 21 Jul, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@8669 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 22 May, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Christophe Dumez authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@7388 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 09 May, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Alexandre Boeglin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@7134 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 25 Mar, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Yoshinori Okuji authored
Remove unneeded executable flags. git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@6280 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 02 Mar, 2006 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@5931 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 18 Oct, 2005 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@4068 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 15 Oct, 2005 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
added a test for "different interactions in the same interaction workflow cannot be triggered by the same method_id" git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@4032 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 14 Oct, 2005 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@4029 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 26 Sep, 2005 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
(currently broken so not activated) git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@3875 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 23 Sep, 2005 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@3842 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 18 Jul, 2005 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@3458 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
- 04 Apr, 2005 2 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@2785 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-
Sebastien Robin authored
git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@2783 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
-