So that we could find the particular builds according to
build_name and ref. It would be used to find the latest
build artifacts from a particular branch or tag.

Fix log statements in import/export

Fixes - as seen in the logs:
```
Import/Export error raised on /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer.rb:19:in `rescue in import': undefined method `message' for #<String:0x007fc45e977e10>
```

See merge request !5129

Add information when member joined a team

## What does this MR do?
It adds timeago label by every member on team page
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Yes, maybe design is not OK, please check.

## Why was this MR needed?

It's useful information

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![joxi_screenshot_1467820915126](/uploads/9e5657443a10a9fe204367d7b6749b1f/joxi_screenshot_1467820915126.png)



See merge request !5116

Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>

Services: code style fixes, minor refactoring

## What does this MR do?

It contains code style fixes, minor refactoring and also it removes some unnecessary comments. Every comment require a support just like a regular code line and this is why we should avoid using comments everywhere unless it's really helpful. Martin Fowler said "Find comment and refactor the code around it" :) our code is not that bad so let's not spoil it with comments.

## Why was this MR needed?

Because GitLab is a live example of awesome code. Let's keep up a good job :) 


See merge request !5112

Show last push widget in upstream after push to fork

## What does this MR do?

Show the last push widget in the upstream project when you push to a fork. 

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

In the view, I'm checking if `@project` in the first part of the conditional. I felt it was necessary in case `@project` wasn't an object in all cases. Will it ever not be there? Is this check necessary?

Should there be tests? I don't see existing ones for this. 

## Why was this MR needed?

I use the fork workflow everywhere and it has annoyed me for some time that the last push widget doesn't show up when viewing the upstream project. I'm almost never viewing the fork in GitLab so I want to be able to easily create a MR in any case. 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

**Widget in upstream repo:**

![Screen_Shot_2016-06-23_at_10.05.29_AM](/uploads/f823642e40cf059c3793db6cf00bba50/Screen_Shot_2016-06-23_at_10.05.29_AM.png)

**Widget in fork**:

![Screen_Shot_2016-06-23_at_10.05.25_AM](/uploads/1a976241186ec42cdc43c80bea0c856b/Screen_Shot_2016-06-23_at_10.05.25_AM.png)

**Widget on dashboard**:

![Screen_Shot_2016-06-23_at_10.06.07_AM](/uploads/084ac35f67735aec8042d9bc904255fe/Screen_Shot_2016-06-23_at_10.06.07_AM.png)


See merge request !4880

Allow everyone to order tags, not only those who has access

## What does this MR do?
Allows everyone to view tags by different order (by name, date, etc), not only those who has access

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Just check how it's rendered.

## Why was this MR needed?
Because now I can't order other's project tags.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#15438

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Exist in related issue. Look [one comment](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/15438#note_12888763) and [just below there is another one](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/15438#note_12888819).

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
Probably, no need

See merge request !5105

Fixed issue with build auto-refresh not working

## What does this MR do?

Due to the `.json` at the end of the build URL fetch, the page wont correctly auto-reload the build log. This fixes that.

See merge request !5110

Get rid of pluralize on stage names

## What does this MR do?
Removes `pluralize` from stage names

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #18283   
Part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18920

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-06_at_11.11.39_AM](/uploads/b1b2dd00dc8aacc6dff40cab1fe1ecdd/Screen_Shot_2016-07-06_at_11.11.39_AM.png)

cc @ayufan 


See merge request !5117

Added 100% width to open dropdown menus on mobile

## What does this MR do?

Sets dropdown-menus to be 100% width on small screens.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Do we want this on all dropdown menus or only dropdown menus activated by full-width buttons?
/cc @dzaporozhets 

## Why was this MR needed?

Mobile UX.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #18858.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-06-22_at_00.14.09](/uploads/bd61721896bfac8af951374c2547acd6/Screen_Shot_2016-06-22_at_00.14.09.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !4844

[ci skip]

Fix erroneous YAML spacing in LDAP configuration

## What does this MR do?

Fix erroneous indentation in LDAP example configuration

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Is the indentation correct now? 😂 

## Why was this MR needed?

Bad configs in docs suck.

See merge request !4326

Fix importer for GitHub Pull Requests when a branch was reused across Pull Requests

Closes #17766

## What does this MR do?

GitHub importer fails when a repository has two Pull Requests, with the same branch name and different SHA, one of which was closed without merging, and one which is open or was merged in. This happens because we only checks if the branch exists in the [Gitlab::GithubImport::BranchFormatter#exists?](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/lib/gitlab/github_import/branch_formatter.rb#L6-8), before creating the missing references on Github. With this MR we check if both branch, and SHA exists in the current project. If no, we create the missing reference on GitHub before import the PR.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Nope.

## Why was this MR needed?

Github importer will fail if branch was reused across Pull Requests.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19439

/cc @royaldark @thomasjachmann

See merge request !5103

Cancel creating or editing note by hitting Escape

/cc @rspeicher 

See merge request !5075

Remove duplicate templates that are lowercase

See merge request !5114

Throttle the update of `project.pushes_since_gc` to 1 minute

## What does this MR do?

Throttle the update of `project.pushes_since_gc` to alleviate DB load

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Relates to #15094

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- ~~[ ] API support added~~
- Tests
  - ~~[ ] Added for this feature/bug~~
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)


See merge request !5083

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Fix diff comments not showing up in activity feed

## What does this MR do?

It fixes the detection of note events to check for `Note` and `LegacyDiffNote`.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

No? /cc @DouweM (since I believe you introduced `LegacyDiffNote`

## Why was this MR needed?

To fix #19092.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #19092.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5069

Bump GITLAB_SHELL_VERSION to 3.2.0

Bump GITLAB_SHELL_VERSION to 3.2.0

Needed for !4696 to properly work.

Blocked by gitlab-org/gitlab-shell!62

See merge request !5101

Allow `?`, or `&` for label names

Closes #18727 

See merge request !4724

Fixing URL validation for import_url on projects

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17536

This MR fixes problems related to bypassing `import_url` validation on projects. This makes sure the URL is properly validated so we don't enter crap and fail while running workers that handle this URL.

It also adds a migration to fix current invalid `import_url`s

See merge request !4753

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Add and update .gitignore & .gitlab-ci.yml templates for 8.10



See merge request !5107

Add more debug info to import/export and memory killer

This should help debug https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19124 further

See merge request !5108