Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Z
ZODB
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
ZODB
Commits
b7627cb4
Commit
b7627cb4
authored
Sep 04, 2005
by
Tim Peters
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
In accord with the endless debate on zodb-dev, remove the ``order=``
argument from addBeforeCommitHook().
parent
b862541c
Changes
4
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
4 changed files
with
21 additions
and
152 deletions
+21
-152
NEWS.txt
NEWS.txt
+4
-6
src/transaction/_transaction.py
src/transaction/_transaction.py
+11
-27
src/transaction/interfaces.py
src/transaction/interfaces.py
+5
-15
src/transaction/tests/test_transaction.py
src/transaction/tests/test_transaction.py
+1
-104
No files found.
NEWS.txt
View file @
b7627cb4
...
...
@@ -10,12 +10,10 @@ Zope3 development). These are the dates of the internal releases:
Commit hooks
------------
- (3.6a1) A new ``addBeforeCommitHook()`` method of transactions generalizes
the older ``beforeCommitHook()`` method, with a more-robust signature
and an optional new ``order`` argument to influence the order in which
commit hooks are invoked. ``beforeCommitHook()`` is now deprecated, and
will be removed in ZODB 3.7. Thanks to Julien Anguenot for contributing
code and tests.
- (3.6a1) The ``beforeCommitHook()`` method has been replaced by the new
``addBeforeCommitHook()`` method, with a more-robust signature.
``beforeCommitHook()`` is now deprecated, and will be removed in ZODB 3.8.
Thanks to Julien Anguenot for contributing code and tests.
PersistentMapping
-----------------
...
...
src/transaction/_transaction.py
View file @
b7627cb4
...
...
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ committed or aborted. The methods are passed the current Transaction
as their only argument.
"""
import
bisect
import
logging
import
sys
import
thread
...
...
@@ -239,16 +238,8 @@ class Transaction(object):
# raised, incorporating this traceback.
self
.
_failure_traceback
=
None
# List of (order, index, hook, args, kws) tuples added by
# addbeforeCommitHook(). `index` is used to resolve ties on equal
# `order` values, preserving the order in which the hooks were
# registered. Each time we append a tuple to _before_commit,
# the current value of _before_commit_index is used for the
# index, and then the latter is incremented by 1.
# TODO: in Python 2.4, change to collections.deque; lists can be
# inefficient for FIFO access of this kind.
# List of (hook, args, kws) tuples added by addbeforeCommitHook().
self
.
_before_commit
=
[]
self
.
_before_commit_index
=
0
# Raise TransactionFailedError, due to commit()/join()/register()
# getting called when the current transaction has already suffered
...
...
@@ -415,34 +406,27 @@ class Transaction(object):
raise
t
,
v
,
tb
def
getBeforeCommitHooks
(
self
):
# Don't return the hook order and index values because of
# backward compatibility, and because they're internal details.
return
iter
([
x
[
2
:]
for
x
in
self
.
_before_commit
])
def
addBeforeCommitHook
(
self
,
hook
,
args
=
(),
kws
=
None
,
order
=
0
):
if
not
isinstance
(
order
,
int
):
raise
ValueError
(
"An integer value is required "
"for the order argument"
)
return
iter
(
self
.
_before_commit
)
def
addBeforeCommitHook
(
self
,
hook
,
args
=
(),
kws
=
None
):
if
kws
is
None
:
kws
=
{}
bisect
.
insort
(
self
.
_before_commit
,
(
order
,
self
.
_before_commit_index
,
hook
,
tuple
(
args
),
kws
))
self
.
_before_commit_index
+=
1
self
.
_before_commit
.
append
((
hook
,
tuple
(
args
),
kws
))
def
beforeCommitHook
(
self
,
hook
,
*
args
,
**
kws
):
from
ZODB.utils
import
deprecated38
deprecated38
(
"Use addBeforeCommitHook instead of beforeCommitHook."
)
# Default order is zero.
self
.
addBeforeCommitHook
(
hook
,
args
,
kws
,
order
=
0
)
self
.
addBeforeCommitHook
(
hook
,
args
,
kws
)
def
_callBeforeCommitHooks
(
self
):
# Call all hooks registered, allowing further registrations
# during processing.
while
self
.
_before_commit
:
order
,
index
,
hook
,
args
,
kws
=
self
.
_before_commit
.
pop
(
0
)
# during processing. Note that calls to addBeforeCommitHook() may
# add additional hooks while hooks are running, and iterating over a
# growing list is well-defined in Python.
for
hook
,
args
,
kws
in
self
.
_before_commit
:
hook
(
*
args
,
**
kws
)
self
.
_before_commit
_index
=
0
self
.
_before_commit
=
[]
def
_commitResources
(
self
):
# Execute the two-phase commit protocol.
...
...
src/transaction/interfaces.py
View file @
b7627cb4
...
...
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ class ITransaction(zope.interface.Interface):
instead.
"""
def
addBeforeCommitHook
(
hook
,
args
=
(),
kws
=
None
,
order
=
0
):
def
addBeforeCommitHook
(
hook
,
args
=
(),
kws
=
None
):
"""Register a hook to call before the transaction is committed.
The specified hook function will be called after the transaction's
...
...
@@ -208,20 +208,10 @@ class ITransaction(zope.interface.Interface):
arguments are passed).
Multiple hooks can be registered and will be called in the order they
were registered (first registered, first called), except that
hooks registered with different `order` arguments are invoked from
smallest `order` value to largest. `order` must be an integer,
and defaults to 0.
For instance, a hook registered with order=1 will be invoked after
another hook registered with order=-1 and before another registered
with order=2, regardless of which was registered first. When two
hooks are registered with the same order, the first one registered is
called first.
This method can also be called from a hook: an executing hook can
register more hooks. Applications should take care to avoid creating
infinite loops by recursively registering hooks.
were registered (first registered, first called). This method can
also be called from a hook: an executing hook can register more
hooks. Applications should take care to avoid creating infinite loops
by recursively registering hooks.
Hooks are called only for a top-level commit. A subtransaction
commit or savepoint creation does not call any hooks. If the
...
...
src/transaction/tests/test_transaction.py
View file @
b7627cb4
...
...
@@ -414,28 +414,6 @@ def test_join():
def
hook
():
pass
class
BeforeCommitHookTests
(
unittest
.
TestCase
):
def
test_01_beforecommithook_order_exceptions
(
self
):
# string
t
=
transaction
.
Transaction
()
self
.
assertRaises
(
ValueError
,
t
.
addBeforeCommitHook
,
hook
,
order
=
'string'
)
def
test_02_beforecommithook_order_exceptions
(
self
):
# float
t
=
transaction
.
Transaction
()
self
.
assertRaises
(
ValueError
,
t
.
addBeforeCommitHook
,
hook
,
order
=
1.2
)
def
test_03_beforecommithook_order_exceptions
(
self
):
# object
t
=
transaction
.
Transaction
()
class
foo
:
pass
self
.
assertRaises
(
ValueError
,
t
.
addBeforeCommitHook
,
hook
,
order
=
foo
())
# deprecated38; remove this then
def
test_beforeCommitHook
():
"""Test beforeCommitHook.
...
...
@@ -613,7 +591,7 @@ def test_beforeCommitHook():
"""
def
test_addBeforeCommitHook
():
"""Test addBeforeCommitHook
, without order arguments
.
"""Test addBeforeCommitHook.
Let's define a hook to call, and a way to see that it was called.
...
...
@@ -752,92 +730,11 @@ def test_addBeforeCommitHook():
>>> reset_log()
"""
def
test_addBeforeCommitHookOrder
():
"""Test addBeforeCommitHook with order arguments.
Register a hook with an order explicitly equal to 0 (the default value):
>>> import transaction
>>> t = transaction.begin()
>>> t.addBeforeCommitHook(hook, '1', order=0)
We can see that the hook is indeed registered.
>>> [(hook.func_name, args, kws)
... for hook, args, kws in t.getBeforeCommitHooks()]
[('hook', ('1',), {})]
Let's add another one with a smaller order. It will be registered
to be called first.
>>> t.addBeforeCommitHook(hook, '2', order=-999999)
>>> [(hook.func_name, args, kws)
... for hook, args, kws in t.getBeforeCommitHooks()]
[('hook', ('2',), {}), ('hook', ('1',), {})]
Let's add another one with a bigger order. It will be registered
to be called last.
>>> t.addBeforeCommitHook(hook, '3', order=999999)
>>> for hook, args, kws in t.getBeforeCommitHooks():
... print (hook.func_name, args, kws)
('hook', ('2',), {})
('hook', ('1',), {})
('hook', ('3',), {})
Above, we checked that the order parameter works as expected.
Now check that insertion with the same order values respects the order
of registration.
>>> t.addBeforeCommitHook(hook, '4') # order=0 implied
>>> for hook, args, kws in t.getBeforeCommitHooks():
... print (hook.func_name, args, kws)
('hook', ('2',), {})
('hook', ('1',), {})
('hook', ('4',), {})
('hook', ('3',), {})
>>> t.addBeforeCommitHook(hook, '5', order=999999)
>>> for hook, args, kws in t.getBeforeCommitHooks():
... print (hook.func_name, args, kws)
('hook', ('2',), {})
('hook', ('1',), {})
('hook', ('4',), {})
('hook', ('3',), {})
('hook', ('5',), {})
>>> t.addBeforeCommitHook(hook, '6', order=-999999)
>>> for hook, args, kws in t.getBeforeCommitHooks():
... print (hook.func_name, args, kws)
('hook', ('2',), {})
('hook', ('6',), {})
('hook', ('1',), {})
('hook', ('4',), {})
('hook', ('3',), {})
('hook', ('5',), {})
>>> def hook2():
... pass
>>> t.addBeforeCommitHook(hook2, '8', order=0)
>>> for hook, args, kws in t.getBeforeCommitHooks():
... print (hook.func_name, args, kws)
('hook', ('2',), {})
('hook', ('6',), {})
('hook', ('1',), {})
('hook', ('4',), {})
('hook2', ('8',), {})
('hook', ('3',), {})
('hook', ('5',), {})
"""
def
test_suite
():
from
zope.testing.doctest
import
DocTestSuite
return
unittest
.
TestSuite
((
DocTestSuite
(),
unittest
.
makeSuite
(
TransactionTests
),
unittest
.
makeSuite
(
BeforeCommitHookTests
),
))
if
__name__
==
'__main__'
:
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment