Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
C
converse.js
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
converse.js
Commits
5750f4cf
Commit
5750f4cf
authored
Mar 09, 2016
by
Michal Čihař
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Plain Diff
Merge pull request #1009 from matejcik/master
clarify order of application of group ACLs
parents
f672038e
9d25b500
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
9 additions
and
0 deletions
+9
-0
docs/admin/access.rst
docs/admin/access.rst
+9
-0
No files found.
docs/admin/access.rst
View file @
5750f4cf
...
...
@@ -194,6 +194,15 @@ also be locked to multiple objects through multiple group ACLs. As long as
a group is recorded in at least one group ACL, it's considered to be "locked",
and its privileges do not apply outside the locks.
Group ACLs apply in order of specificity. "Component" is considered most
specific, "Language" is least specific. Combinations follow the most specific
part of the combination: a group ACL that is locked to a particular component
is more specific than a group ACL locked to this component's project and
a particular language. That means that members of the component-specific groups
will have privileges on the component, and members of the
project-and-language-specific groups will not. The latter will, of course, have
privileges on their language in all other components of the project.
Managing users and groups
-------------------------
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment