Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
erp5
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Labels
Merge Requests
138
Merge Requests
138
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Jobs
Commits
Open sidebar
nexedi
erp5
Commits
ac09b820
Commit
ac09b820
authored
Jun 06, 2016
by
Julien Muchembled
1
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
ERP5Type: make sure the correct __setattr__ is used when the class is still ghost
parent
0b562a83
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
34 additions
and
1 deletion
+34
-1
product/ERP5Type/dynamic/lazy_class.py
product/ERP5Type/dynamic/lazy_class.py
+11
-0
product/ERP5Type/tests/testDynamicClassGeneration.py
product/ERP5Type/tests/testDynamicClassGeneration.py
+23
-1
No files found.
product/ERP5Type/dynamic/lazy_class.py
View file @
ac09b820
...
...
@@ -118,6 +118,17 @@ class GhostBaseMetaClass(ExtensionClass, AccessorHolderType):
# (which would even trigger migration, resulting in a ConflictError).
cls
.
__getnewargs__
=
None
def
__setattr__
(
self
,
name
,
value
):
"""
When the first access to an object is a call to setattr, __getattribute__
is not involved. Here, we preempt persistent.__setattr__ so that the
correct __setattr__ is used. For example, without this, a broken object
(ERP5BaseBroken) would not raise.
"""
self
.
__class__
.
loadClass
()
setattr
(
self
,
name
,
value
)
cls
.
__setattr__
=
__setattr__
InitGhostBase
=
GhostBaseMetaClass
(
'InitGhostBase'
,
(
ERP5Base
,),
{})
class
PortalTypeMetaClass
(
GhostBaseMetaClass
,
PropertyHolder
):
...
...
product/ERP5Type/tests/testDynamicClassGeneration.py
View file @
ac09b820
...
...
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ import unittest
import
transaction
from
persistent
import
Persistent
from
ZODB.broken
import
BrokenModified
from
Products.ERP5Type.dynamic.portal_type_class
import
synchronizeDynamicModules
from
Products.ERP5Type.dynamic.lazy_class
import
ERP5BaseBroken
,
InitGhostBase
from
Products.ERP5Type.tests.ERP5TypeTestCase
import
ERP5TypeTestCase
from
zope.interface
import
Interface
,
implementedBy
...
...
@@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ class TestPortalTypeClass(ERP5TypeTestCase):
# then change the type value to something not descending from Folder
# and check behavior
ptype
.
setTypeClass
(
'Address'
)
ptype
.
setTypeClass
(
types_tool
.
Address
.
getTypeClass
()
)
# while the class has not been reset is should still descend from Folder
self
.
assertTrue
(
issubclass
(
module_class
,
Folder
))
...
...
@@ -2245,6 +2247,26 @@ class Test(ERP5TypeTestCase):
self.assertNotEqual(re.search(expected_msg_re_str, output, re.DOTALL), None,
"Expected '
%
s
' in '
%
s
'" % (expected_msg_re_str, output))
def testERP5Broken(self):
# Create a broken ghost object
import erp5.portal_type
name = self._testMethodName
ptype = self.portal.portal_types.newContent(name, type_class="File")
file = ptype.constructInstance(self.portal, name, data="foo")
self.assertEqual(file.size, 3)
self.commit()
self.portal._p_jar.cacheMinimize()
del file
delattr(erp5.portal_type, name)
ptype.setTypeClass(name)
self.commit()
file = self.portal.__dict__[name]
self.assertTrue(isinstance(file, InitGhostBase))
# Check that the class is unghosted before resolving __setattr__
self.assertRaises(BrokenModified, setattr, file, "size", 0)
self.assertTrue(isinstance(file, ERP5BaseBroken))
self.assertEqual(file.size, 3)
def test_suite():
suite = unittest.TestSuite()
suite.addTest(unittest.makeSuite(TestPortalTypeClass))
...
...
Julien Muchembled
@jm
mentioned in merge request
!123 (merged)
·
Jun 06, 2016
mentioned in merge request
!123 (merged)
mentioned in merge request !123
Toggle commit list
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment