Commit ead24610 authored by Jérome Perrin's avatar Jérome Perrin

Those 4 tests are currently expected to fail.

The fix is probably easy, the tests are just failing because they make
assertions on sequence.get('applied_rule'), but in new simulation this applied
rule is the simulation root applied rule and those assertions will have to be
done on the level below.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35495 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
parent d10c64f7
...@@ -529,6 +529,15 @@ for failing_method in [ ...@@ -529,6 +529,15 @@ for failing_method in [
# This test does not work as it is because of the different behaviour of # This test does not work as it is because of the different behaviour of
# Adopt Solver. # Adopt Solver.
'test_05d_SimulationChangeResourceOnOneSimulationMovementForMergedLine', 'test_05d_SimulationChangeResourceOnOneSimulationMovementForMergedLine',
# Those tests currently fail because they are making assertions on an applied
# rule which with the new simulation structure is not the same as in the
# original test packing list
'test_03_PackingListChangeStartDate',
'test_06_SimulationChangeStartDate',
'test_07_SimulationChangeStartDateWithTwoOrderLine',
'test_07a_SimulationChangeStartDateWithTwoOrderLine',
]: ]:
setattr(TestERP5SimulationPackingList, failing_method, setattr(TestERP5SimulationPackingList, failing_method,
expectedFailure(getattr(TestERP5SimulationPackingList, failing_method))) expectedFailure(getattr(TestERP5SimulationPackingList, failing_method)))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment