1. 21 Jul, 2016 1 commit
  2. 20 Jul, 2016 1 commit
  3. 07 Jul, 2016 1 commit
  4. 28 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  5. 23 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  6. 04 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  7. 02 Mar, 2016 2 commits
  8. 01 Feb, 2016 2 commits
  9. 28 Jan, 2016 1 commit
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      erp5_core: Fix ListMode view for ListBox with several tabs. · fa3caa00
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      1. On Tab1, from PurchaseSupply_view, click on 'Purchase Supply Lines':
         Base_viewListMode??proxy_form_id=PurchaseSupply_view&proxy_field_id=listbox
      
         This Python Script initialise 'list_mode_proxy_selection' with the
         above 2 GET parameters and then displays PurchaseSupply_view.listbox
         indirectly but current Form is Base_viewListModeRenderer.
      
      2. On Tab2, from SaleSupply_view, click on 'Sale Supply Lines':
         Base_viewListMode?proxy_form_id=SaleSupply_view&proxy_field_id=listbox
      
         This Python Script initialise 'list_mode_proxy_selection' with the
         above 2 GET parameters and then displays SaleSupply_view.listbox
         indirectly but current Form is Base_viewListModeRenderer.
      
      3. On Tab1, filter Purchase Supply Lines.
      
         As proxy_form_id and proxy_field_id are not given, then
         Base_viewListModeRender fallbacks on 'list_mode_proxy_selection'
         values to find out the Form ID to be called and wrongly display
         SaleSupply_view.listbox (2.).
      fa3caa00
  10. 19 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  11. 15 Dec, 2015 1 commit
  12. 14 Dec, 2015 2 commits
  13. 08 Dec, 2015 1 commit
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      erp5_simulation: Display Divergence dialog even if there is nothing to solve... · c84f39af
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      erp5_simulation: Display Divergence dialog even if there is nothing to solve (same as legacy Simulation Dialog).
      
      This fixes the following Site Error when there is no Divergence to solve:
        AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'SolverProcess_getSolverDecisionList'
      
      This may happen if user selects 'Solve Divergence' Action and solve
      Divergences, then immediately goes back and selects again this action
      whereas there is actually no Divergence to solve.
      c84f39af
  14. 07 Dec, 2015 1 commit
  15. 02 Dec, 2015 2 commits
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      Revert "simulation: allow to use solve divergence dialog when state is calculating" · 71f4f649
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      This reverts commit 5fac6732:
      
        When the Divergence is solved and user goes back to the main view, the
        button is visible but when user clicks ont it and if Activities have
        been processed in the meantime, this will raise an AttributeError
        because newSolverProcess returns None and there is nothing to display.
      
        This happens even when adding Delivery_isDivergent() as a guard
        because it still returns True if Activities are running in background.
      71f4f649
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      erp5_pdm: Provide a count_method on Resource Modules by default. · 50e4092c
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      count_method was removed from Base_viewFieldLibrary/my_view_mode_module_listbox
      used by Resource Module ListBox (76282344) for performance issues when
      countFolder is called with a Module containing > ~50k documents but this
      should not be relevant for Resource Modules.
      50e4092c
  16. 25 Nov, 2015 4 commits
  17. 19 Nov, 2015 4 commits
  18. 18 Nov, 2015 6 commits
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      simulation: Add getTestedPropertyList() is still widely used so define it for compatibility sake. · 899b05c7
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      Followup of: "simulation: improve equivalence testers explanations messages".
      899b05c7
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      simulation: Define getTestedProperty() on mixin rather than subclasses. · 035530d4
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      This makes more sense as all Tester inherits from EquivalenceTesterMixin,
      even project-specific EquivalenceTester classes.
      
      Followup of: "simulation: improve equivalence testers explanations messages".
      035530d4
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      Fix conflicts between 2a188797 and df04eb69. · b0ff7ee6
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      * 2a188797: "simulation: improve equivalence testers explanations messages"
      * df04eb69: "Implement delivery.getQuantity() == 0."
      b0ff7ee6
    • Sebastien Robin's avatar
      simulation: improve equivalence testers explanations messages (part 2) · 50b6baf3
      Sebastien Robin authored
      Default values for tested_property and tested_property_title must not
      be of type tuple any more since theses properties are no longer multi
      valued
      50b6baf3
    • Sebastien Robin's avatar
      simulation: improve equivalence testers explanations messages · 2a188797
      Sebastien Robin authored
      With latest simulation, the explanation given to user when solving a
      divergence was not good enough :
      - Property ids were displayed without possibility to display
        business word (like displaying 'stop_date' instead of
        'Delivery Date'
      - Some message was displayed in the solve divergence dialog whatever
        was the equivalence tester behind. Therefore, customizations of
        messages made a equivalence tester level were not displayed to user
      
      Therefore, following was done:
      - in solve divergence dialog, include the message generated by the
        equivalence tester
      - use tested_property_title to allow using business words to describe
        properties having divergence
      - most equivalence testers are written in a way to evaluate divergence
        on a single property. To have better UI configuration of such equivalence
        testers, change tested_property and tested_property_title properties
        type from "lines" to "string". This required to add some backward
        compatible code.
      - use Variation Divergence Tester to show a case of an equivalence
        tester using different properties. For this, add a property sheet
        dedicated to multi properties equivalence testers
      - update propertysheets to allow translating tested_property_title
      
      Conflicts:
      	product/ERP5/Document/DateTimeEquivalenceTester.py
      2a188797
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      08d6d578
  19. 17 Nov, 2015 2 commits
  20. 16 Nov, 2015 2 commits
  21. 10 Nov, 2015 3 commits
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      Tester decision movement can be a SM. · 3dd512f3
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      Followup of 4b664ba: When comparing Trade Model Rule input_movement from
      AmountGenerator and decision which is a Simulation Movement.
      
      This fixes test_13_AddAllowanceForOutsourcingOrder.
      3dd512f3
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      Make BusinessProcess temporary SM a child of its AR rather than Trade Model Path. · ff7d4dc8
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      getTradePhaseMovementList() returns temporary SM with appropriate arrow
      and dates but these temporary SM have their corresponding Trade Model
      Path as a parent which means that Simulation Movement API is partially
      unuseable (such as getting parent Applied Rule...).
      
      Moreover, it seems strange for a Simulation Movement to not be a child
      of an Applied Rule.
      
      Therefore, create the temporary SM as a child of its corresponding AR.
      ff7d4dc8
    • Arnaud Fontaine's avatar
      Implement delivery.getQuantity() == 0. · df04eb69
      Arnaud Fontaine authored
      When RSPL/RPPL Invoice Lines are on the same SIT TML as its
      corresponding SO/PO IL movements, the sum may be 0 and there is nothing
      wrong about it. This was implemented in Legacy Simulation.
      df04eb69