• Nicolas Dumazet's avatar
    fix wrong test that expected edit() to call the public setter. · 98bfee4f
    Nicolas Dumazet authored
    It happened sometime, with aq_dynamic, when a setter was overriden on the class
    itself, that setFoo was called on a edit(foo=bar), as class methods were taking
    priority over aq_dynamic-generated-setters.  Now, the correct behavior is back:
    edit(foo=bar) calls the private setter directly, and never the public setter.
    
    See "Workflow triggers and edit/_edit calling (or not) private or public
    setters" email for reference.
    
    
    git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@43304 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
    98bfee4f
testInteractionWorkflow.py 25.1 KB