Commit 0c14042a authored by Stan Hu's avatar Stan Hu

Rework performance section to allow for string freezing

Relates to #47424
parent 93c7b6c5
...@@ -347,13 +347,7 @@ def expire_first_branch_cache ...@@ -347,13 +347,7 @@ def expire_first_branch_cache
end end
``` ```
## Anti-Patterns ## String Freezing
This is a collection of [anti-patterns][anti-pattern] that should be avoided
unless these changes have a measurable, significant and positive impact on
production environments.
### String Freezing
In recent Ruby versions calling `freeze` on a String leads to it being allocated In recent Ruby versions calling `freeze` on a String leads to it being allocated
only once and re-used. For example, on Ruby 2.3 this will only allocate the only once and re-used. For example, on Ruby 2.3 this will only allocate the
...@@ -365,17 +359,38 @@ only once and re-used. For example, on Ruby 2.3 this will only allocate the ...@@ -365,17 +359,38 @@ only once and re-used. For example, on Ruby 2.3 this will only allocate the
end end
``` ```
Blindly adding a `.freeze` call to every String is an anti-pattern that should Depending on the size of the String and how frequently it would be allocated
be avoided unless one can prove (using production data) the call actually has a (before the `.freeze` call was added), this _may_ make things faster, but
positive impact on performance. there's no guarantee it will.
Strings will be frozen by default in Ruby 3.0. To prepare our code base for
this eventuality, it's a good practice to add the following header to all
Ruby files:
```ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true
```
This may cause test failures in the code that expects to be able to manipulate
strings. Instead of using `dup`, use the unary plus to get an unfrozen string:
```ruby
test = +"hello"
test += " world"
```
## Anti-Patterns
This feature of Ruby wasn't really meant to make things faster directly, instead This is a collection of [anti-patterns][anti-pattern] that should be avoided
it was meant to reduce the number of allocations. Depending on the size of the unless these changes have a measurable, significant and positive impact on
String and how frequently it would be allocated (before the `.freeze` call was production environments.
added), this _may_ make things faster, but there's no guarantee it will.
Another common flavour of this is to not only freeze a String, but also assign ### Moving Allocations to Constants
it to a constant, for example:
Storing an object as a constant so you only allocate it once _may_ improve
performance, but there's no guarantee this will. Looking up constants has an
impact on runtime performance, and as such, using a constant instead of
referencing an object directly may even slow code down. For example:
```ruby ```ruby
SOME_CONSTANT = 'foo'.freeze SOME_CONSTANT = 'foo'.freeze
...@@ -393,13 +408,6 @@ there's nothing stopping somebody from doing this elsewhere in the code: ...@@ -393,13 +408,6 @@ there's nothing stopping somebody from doing this elsewhere in the code:
SOME_CONSTANT = 'bar' SOME_CONSTANT = 'bar'
``` ```
### Moving Allocations to Constants
Storing an object as a constant so you only allocate it once _may_ improve
performance, but there's no guarantee this will. Looking up constants has an
impact on runtime performance, and as such, using a constant instead of
referencing an object directly may even slow code down.
[#15607]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/15607 [#15607]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/15607
[yorickpeterse]: https://gitlab.com/yorickpeterse [yorickpeterse]: https://gitlab.com/yorickpeterse
[anti-pattern]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-pattern [anti-pattern]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-pattern
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment