Fix some links to gitlab-foss

doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 ## Issue tracker guidelines
 
-**[Search the issue tracker](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues)** for similar entries before
+**[Search the issue tracker](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues)** for similar entries before
 submitting your own, there's a good chance somebody else had the same issue or
 feature proposal. Show your support with an award emoji and/or join the
 discussion.
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ project.
 ## Labels
 
 To allow for asynchronous issue handling, we use [milestones](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/milestones)
-and [labels](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/labels). Leads and product managers handle most of the
+and [labels](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/labels). Leads and product managers handle most of the
 scheduling into milestones. Labelling is a task for everyone.
 
 Most issues will have labels for at least one of the following:
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Most issues will have labels for at least one of the following:
 - Severity: ~`S1`, `~S2`, `~S3`, `~S4`
 
 All labels, their meaning and priority are defined on the
-[labels page](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/labels).
+[labels page](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/labels).
 
 If you come across an issue that has none of these, and you're allowed to set
 labels, you can _always_ add the team and type, and often also the subject.
@@ -372,14 +372,11 @@ A recent example of this was the issue for
 
 ## Feature proposals
 
-To create a feature proposal for CE, open an issue on the
-[issue tracker of CE](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues).
-
-For feature proposals for EE, open an issue on the
-[issue tracker of EE](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues).
+To create a feature proposal, open an issue on the
+[issue tracker](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues).
 
 In order to help track the feature proposals, we have created a
-[`feature`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues?label_name=feature) label. For the time being, users that are not members
+[`feature`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues?label_name=feature) label. For the time being, users that are not members
 of the project cannot add labels. You can instead ask one of the [core team](https://about.gitlab.com/community/core-team/)
 members to add the label ~feature to the issue or add the following
 code snippet right after your description in a new line: `~feature`.
@@ -441,7 +438,7 @@ addressed.
 ## Technical and UX debt
 
 In order to track things that can be improved in GitLab's codebase,
-we use the ~"technical debt" label in [GitLab's issue tracker](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues).
+we use the ~"technical debt" label in [GitLab's issue tracker](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues).
 For missed user experience requirements, we use the ~"UX debt" label.
 
 These labels should be added to issues that describe things that can be improved,

doc/development/migration_style_guide.md

@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ end
 ```
 
 If a computed update is needed, the value can be wrapped in `Arel.sql`, so Arel
-treats it as an SQL literal. It's also a required deprecation for [Rails 6](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/61451).
+treats it as an SQL literal. It's also a required deprecation for [Rails 6](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/28497).
 
 The below example is the same as the one above, but
 the value is set to the product of the `bar` and `baz` columns:

doc/development/module_with_instance_variables.md

@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ People are saying multiple inheritance is bad. Mixing multiple modules with
 multiple instance variables scattering everywhere suffer from the same issue.
 The same applies to `ActiveSupport::Concern`. See:
 [Consider replacing concerns with dedicated classes & composition](
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/23786)
+https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/16270)
 
 There's also a similar idea:
 [Use decorators and interface segregation to solve overgrowing models problem](
-https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/13484)
+https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/14235)
 
 Note that `included` doesn't solve the whole issue. They define the
 dependencies, but they still allow each modules to talk implicitly via the

doc/development/namespaces_storage_statistics.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ by [`Namespaces#with_statistics`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/blob/4ab5
 
 Additionally, the pattern that is currently used to update the project statistics
 (the callback) doesn't scale adequately. It is currently one of the largest
-[database queries transactions on production](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/62488)
+[database queries transactions on production](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/29070)
 that takes the most time overall. We can't add one more query to it as
 it will increase the transaction's length.
 
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ but we refresh them through Sidekiq jobs and in different transactions:
 1. Create a second table (`namespace_aggregation_schedules`) with two columns `id` and `namespace_id`.
 1. Whenever the statistics of a project changes, insert a row into `namespace_aggregation_schedules`
    - We don't insert a new row if there's already one related to the root namespace.
-   - Keeping in mind the length of the transaction that involves updating `project_statistics`(<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/62488>), the insertion should be done in a different transaction and through a Sidekiq Job.
+   - Keeping in mind the length of the transaction that involves updating `project_statistics`(<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/29070>), the insertion should be done in a different transaction and through a Sidekiq Job.
 1. After inserting the row, we schedule another worker to be executed async at two different moments:
    - One enqueued for immediate execution and another one scheduled in `1.5h` hours.
    - We only schedule the jobs, if we can obtain a `1.5h` lease on Redis on a key based on the root namespace ID.
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ This implementation has the following benefits:
 
 The only downside of this approach is that namespaces' statistics are updated up to `1.5` hours after the change is done,
 which means there's a time window in which the statistics are inaccurate. Because we're still not
-[enforcing storage limits](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/30421), this is not a major problem.
+[enforcing storage limits](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17664), this is not a major problem.
 
 ## Conclusion