Commit 8518daab authored by Marcia Ramos's avatar Marcia Ramos

Merge branch 'add-doc-custom-validators' into 'master'

Add custom validators doc in api styleguide

Closes #208826

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!26734
parents 29af032b bf3a3678
---
title: Add doc for custom validators in api styleguide
merge_request: 26734
author: Rajendra Kadam
type: added
......@@ -116,6 +116,73 @@ For instance:
- endpoint = expose_path(api_v4_projects_issues_related_merge_requests_path(id: @project.id, issue_iid: @issue.iid))
```
## Custom Validators
In order to validate some parameters in the API request, we validate them
before sending them further (say Gitaly). The following are the
[custom validators](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/lib/api/validations/validators),
which we have added so far and how to use them. We also wrote a
guide on how you can add a new custom validator.
### Using custom validators
- `FilePath`:
GitLab supports various functionalities where we need to traverse a file path.
The [`FilePath` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/file_path.rb)
validates the parameter value for different cases. Mainly, it checks whether a
path is relative and does it contain `../../` relative traversal using
`File::Separator` or not, and whether the path is absolute, for example
`/etc/passwd/`.
- `Git SHA`:
The [`Git SHA` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/git_sha.rb)
checks whether the Git SHA parameter is a valid SHA.
It checks by using the regex mentioned in [`commit.rb`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commit/b9857d8b662a2dbbf54f46ecdcecb44702affe55#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_30_30) file.
- `Absence`:
The [`Absence` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/absence.rb)
checks whether a particular parameter is absent in a given parameters hash.
- `IntegerNoneAny`:
The [`IntegerNoneAny` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/integer_none_any.rb)
checks if the value of the given parameter is either an `Integer`, `None`, or `Any`.
It allows only either of these mentioned values to move forward in the request.
- `ArrayNoneAny`:
The [`ArrayNoneAny` validator](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators/array_none_any.rb)
checks if the value of the given parameter is either an `Array`, `None`, or `Any`.
It allows only either of these mentioned values to move forward in the request.
### Adding a new custom validator
Custom validators are a great way to validate parameters before sending
them to platform for further processing. It saves some back-and-forth
from the server to the platform if we identify invalid parameters at the beginning.
If you need to add a custom validator, it would be added to
it's own file in the [`validators`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/lib/api/validations/validators) directory.
Since we use [Grape](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape) to add our API
we inherit from the `Grape::Validations::Base` class in our validator class.
Now, all you have to do is define the `validate_param!` method which takes
in two parameters: the `params` hash and the `param` name to validate.
The body of the method does the hard work of validating the parameter value
and returns appropriate error messages to the caller method.
Lastly, we register the validator using the line below:
```rb
Grape::Validations.register_validator(<validator name as symbol>, ::API::Helpers::CustomValidators::<YourCustomValidatorClassName>)
```
Once you add the validator, make sure you add the `rspec`s for it into
it's own file in the [`validators`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/spec/lib/api/validations/validators) directory.
## Internal API
The [internal API](./internal_api.md) is documented for internal use. Please keep it up to date so we know what endpoints
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment