Commit 8a5e1e3d authored by Adam Hegyi's avatar Adam Hegyi

Merge branch 'use-for-no-key-update-lock' into 'master'

Use the for no key update lock when upadting traversal ids

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!81239
parents 3c2505c5 527cf391
......@@ -31,15 +31,21 @@ class Namespace
# ActiveRecord. https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/13496
# Ideally it would be:
# `incorrect_traversal_ids.update_all('traversal_ids = cte.traversal_ids')`
sql = """
UPDATE namespaces
SET traversal_ids = cte.traversal_ids
FROM (#{recursive_traversal_ids}) as cte
WHERE namespaces.id = cte.id
AND namespaces.traversal_ids::bigint[] <> cte.traversal_ids
"""
sql = <<-SQL
UPDATE namespaces
SET traversal_ids = cte.traversal_ids
FROM (#{recursive_traversal_ids}) as cte
WHERE namespaces.id = cte.id
AND namespaces.traversal_ids::bigint[] <> cte.traversal_ids
SQL
Namespace.transaction do
@root.lock!
if Feature.enabled?(:for_no_key_update_lock, default_enabled: :yaml)
@root.lock!("FOR NO KEY UPDATE")
else
@root.lock!
end
Namespace.connection.exec_query(sql)
end
rescue ActiveRecord::Deadlocked
......
---
name: for_no_key_update_lock
introduced_by_url: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/81239
rollout_issue_url: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/353619
milestone: '14.9'
type: development
group: group::workspaces
default_enabled: false
......@@ -385,23 +385,43 @@ RSpec.describe Group do
end
end
before do
subject
reload_models(old_parent, new_parent, group)
end
context 'within the same hierarchy' do
let!(:root) { create(:group).reload }
let!(:old_parent) { create(:group, parent: root) }
let!(:new_parent) { create(:group, parent: root) }
it 'updates traversal_ids' do
expect(group.traversal_ids).to eq [root.id, new_parent.id, group.id]
context 'with FOR UPDATE lock' do
before do
stub_feature_flags(for_no_key_update_lock: false)
subject
reload_models(old_parent, new_parent, group)
end
it 'updates traversal_ids' do
expect(group.traversal_ids).to eq [root.id, new_parent.id, group.id]
end
it_behaves_like 'hierarchy with traversal_ids'
it_behaves_like 'locked row', 'FOR UPDATE' do
let(:row) { root }
end
end
it_behaves_like 'hierarchy with traversal_ids'
it_behaves_like 'locked row' do
let(:row) { root }
context 'with FOR NO KEY UPDATE lock' do
before do
stub_feature_flags(for_no_key_update_lock: true)
subject
reload_models(old_parent, new_parent, group)
end
it 'updates traversal_ids' do
expect(group.traversal_ids).to eq [root.id, new_parent.id, group.id]
end
it_behaves_like 'hierarchy with traversal_ids'
it_behaves_like 'locked row', 'FOR NO KEY UPDATE' do
let(:row) { root }
end
end
end
......@@ -410,6 +430,11 @@ RSpec.describe Group do
let!(:new_parent) { create(:group) }
let!(:group) { create(:group, parent: old_parent) }
before do
subject
reload_models(old_parent, new_parent, group)
end
it 'updates traversal_ids' do
expect(group.traversal_ids).to eq [new_parent.id, group.id]
end
......@@ -435,6 +460,11 @@ RSpec.describe Group do
let!(:old_parent) { nil }
let!(:new_parent) { create(:group) }
before do
subject
reload_models(old_parent, new_parent, group)
end
it 'updates traversal_ids' do
expect(group.traversal_ids).to eq [new_parent.id, group.id]
end
......@@ -452,6 +482,11 @@ RSpec.describe Group do
let!(:old_parent) { create(:group) }
let!(:new_parent) { nil }
before do
subject
reload_models(old_parent, new_parent, group)
end
it 'updates traversal_ids' do
expect(group.traversal_ids).to eq [group.id]
end
......
......@@ -68,11 +68,24 @@ RSpec.describe Namespace::TraversalHierarchy, type: :model do
end
end
it_behaves_like 'locked row' do
it_behaves_like 'locked row', 'FOR UPDATE' do
let(:recorded_queries) { ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new }
let(:row) { root }
before do
stub_feature_flags(for_no_key_update_lock: false)
recorded_queries.record { subject }
end
end
it_behaves_like 'locked row', 'FOR NO KEY UPDATE' do
let(:recorded_queries) { ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new }
let(:row) { root }
before do
stub_feature_flags(for_no_key_update_lock: true)
recorded_queries.record { subject }
end
end
......
......@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
# Ensure a transaction also occurred.
# Be careful! This form of spec is not foolproof, but better than nothing.
RSpec.shared_examples 'locked row' do
RSpec.shared_examples 'locked row' do |lock_type|
it "has locked row" do
table_name = row.class.table_name
ids_regex = /SELECT.*FROM.*#{table_name}.*"#{table_name}"."id" = #{row.id}.+FOR UPDATE/m
ids_regex = /SELECT.*FROM.*#{table_name}.*"#{table_name}"."id" = #{row.id}.+#{lock_type}/m
expect(recorded_queries.log).to include a_string_matching 'SAVEPOINT'
expect(recorded_queries.log).to include a_string_matching ids_regex
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment