Commit a1437260 authored by Tim Zallmann's avatar Tim Zallmann

Merge branch 'djensen-add-definition-of-breaking-change' into 'master'

Add definition of "breaking changes"

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!52962
parents ba5bedc5 9644688c
...@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ libraries](https://graphql.org/code/#graphql-clients) to consume the ...@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ libraries](https://graphql.org/code/#graphql-clients) to consume the
API and avoid manual parsing. API and avoid manual parsing.
Since there's no fixed endpoints and data model, new abilities can be Since there's no fixed endpoints and data model, new abilities can be
added to the API without creating breaking changes. This allows us to added to the API without creating [breaking changes](../../development/contributing/#breaking-changes). This allows us to
have a versionless API as described in [the GraphQL have a versionless API as described in [the GraphQL
documentation](https://graphql.org/learn/best-practices/#versioning). documentation](https://graphql.org/learn/best-practices/#versioning).
......
...@@ -181,11 +181,21 @@ reasons for including it. ...@@ -181,11 +181,21 @@ reasons for including it.
`@mention` a maintainer in merge requests that contain: `@mention` a maintainer in merge requests that contain:
- More than 500 changes. - More than 500 changes.
- Any major breaking changes. - Any major [breaking changes](#breaking-changes).
- External libraries. - External libraries.
If you are not sure who to mention, the reviewer will do this for you early in the merge request process. If you are not sure who to mention, the reviewer will do this for you early in the merge request process.
#### Breaking changes
A "breaking change" is any change that requires users to make a corresponding change to their code, settings, or workflow. "Users" might be humans, API clients, or even code classes that "use" another class. Examples of breaking changes include:
- Removing a user-facing feature without a replacement/workaround.
- Changing the definition of an existing API (by re-naming query parameters, changing routes, etc.).
- Removing a public method from a code class.
A breaking change can be considered "major" if it affects many users, or represents a significant change in behavior.
#### Issues workflow #### Issues workflow
This [documentation](issue_workflow.md) outlines the current issue workflow: This [documentation](issue_workflow.md) outlines the current issue workflow:
......
...@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Commit messages should follow the guidelines below, for reasons explained by Chr ...@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Commit messages should follow the guidelines below, for reasons explained by Chr
#### Why these standards matter #### Why these standards matter
1. Consistent commit messages that follow these guidelines make the history more readable. 1. Consistent commit messages that follow these guidelines make the history more readable.
1. Concise standard commit messages helps to identify breaking changes for a deployment or ~"master:broken" quicker when 1. Concise standard commit messages helps to identify [breaking changes](index.md#breaking-changes) for a deployment or ~"master:broken" quicker when
reviewing commits between two points in time. reviewing commits between two points in time.
#### Commit message template #### Commit message template
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment