- 16 Aug, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Timothy Andrew authored
- Previously created a protected branch manually, without using a factory.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. `GitPushService` was still using `{merge,push}_access_level_attributes` instead of `{merge,push}_access_levels_attributes`. 2. The branches API creates access levels regardless of the state of the `developers_can_{push,merge}` parameters. This is in line with the UI, where Master access is the default for a new protected branch. 3. Use `after(:build)` to create access levels in the `protected_branches` factory, so that `factories_spec` passes. It only builds records, so we need to create access levels on `build` as well.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. Previously, we were using `after_create` to create access levels. 2. At the time of protected branch creation, there are _no_ access levels present, which is invalid, and creation fails. 3. Fixed by setting access levels before the protected branch is created.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. Change a few incorrect `access_level` to `access_levels.first` that were missed in e805a647. 2. `API::Entities` can iterate over all access levels instead of just the first one. This makes no difference to CE, and makes it more compatible with EE.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. To improve EE compatibility.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
1. This is in regard to the protected branches feature spec. 2. For example, if "Masters" is already selected, don't re-select "Masters" during the spec. 3. This is due to a bug in the frontend implementation, where selecting an already-selected access level _deselects_ it, which is something we don't need. I'll create a separate issue for this. 4. This hasn't turned up before, because we were manually creating missing access levels prior to e805a647. Now, we just use nested attributes, and missing access levels fail validation.
-
Timothy Andrew authored
!581 has a lot of changes that would cause merge conflicts if not properly backported to CE. This commit/MR serves as a better foundation for gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!581. = Changes = 1. Move from `has_one {merge,push}_access_level` to `has_many`, with the `length` of the association limited to `1`. This is _effectively_ a `has_one` association, but should cause less conflicts with EE, which is set to `has_many`. This has a number of related changes in the views, specs, and factories. 2. Make `gon` variable loading more consistent (with EE!581) in the `ProtectedBranchesController`. Also use `::` to prefix the `ProtectedBranches` services, because this is required in EE. 3. Extract a `ProtectedBranchAccess` concern from the two access level models. This concern only has a single `humanize` method here, but will have more methods in EE. 4. Add `form_errors` to the protected branches creation form. This is not strictly required for EE compatibility, but was an oversight nonetheless.
-
- 15 Aug, 2016 33 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Upgrade httpclient gem from 2.7.0.1 to 2.8.2. Fixes deprecation warnings from Ruby 2.3. Resolves #20950. Changelog: https://github.com/nahi/httpclient/blob/b51d7a8bb78f71726b08fbda5abfb900d627569f/CHANGELOG.md#changes-in-282 cc: @stanhu See merge request !5816
-
Robert Speicher authored
Submit to Akismet Part 1 (Issues) Related to #5932 #5573 gitlab-com/infrastructure#14 See merge request !5538
-
Robert Speicher authored
Add rspec feature tests for the diff notes feature. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19957. See merge request !5417
-
Patricio Cano authored
-
Connor Shea authored
Fixes deprecation warnings from Ruby 2.3. Changelog: https://github.com/nahi/httpclient/blob/b51d7a8bb78f71726b08fbda5abfb900d627569f/CHANGELOG.md#changes-in-282
-
Douwe Maan authored
This fixes a long running tests due to changed Sidekiq state ## What does this MR do? Fixes a ordering of tests problem, where GroupsController tests change global state and this affects IrkerService cc @connorshea See merge request !5819
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
Allow to sort by project size on admin projects page Fixes #20317 See merge request !5797
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
Add test coverage badge ## What does this MR do? This MR adds a test coverage badge. Test coverage badge will be a SVG image you can embed in README.md or on your website that will be created dynamically by GitLab, to show information about how much of the code is being covered by tests. In addition to coverage-regexp feature we currently have, this feature will make it possible to use the coverage data obtained from the build log. We will support both - pipeline coverage, or test coverage for particular job in the pipeline. ![coverage_badges](/uploads/dfa307339eb58c8138e551b42c0d8756/coverage_badges.png) ![coverage_badge](/uploads/30406e4bdcf979b2900ffe8996728c97/coverage_badge.png) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #3714 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5708
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
Fix pipeline and build seeds in development environment ## What does this MR do? When we depend on state machine events in seeds, it is likely that we will break fixtures from time to time because when transition rules change, using events most likely invalidates some objects in seeds ## Why was this MR needed? Pipeline and build seeds were broken in development environment. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20933 See merge request !5810
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
When we depend on state machine events in seeds, it is likely that we will break fixtures from time to time because when transition rules change, using events most likely invalidates some objects in seeds.
-
Patricio Cano authored
- Refactored SpamCheckService into SpamService
-
Patricio Cano authored
-
Patricio Cano authored
- Added controller actions as reusable concerns - Added controller tests
-
Patricio Cano authored
- Added `submitted_as_ham` to `SpamLog` to mark which logs have been submitted to Akismet. - Added routes and controller action.
-
Patricio Cano authored
- Removed unnecessary column from `SpamLog` - Moved creation of SpamLogs out of its own service and into SpamCheckService - Simplified code in SpamCheckService. - Moved move spam related code into Spammable concern
-
Patricio Cano authored
- Merged `AkismetSubmittable` into `Spammable` - Clean up `SpamCheckService` - Added tests for `Spammable` - Added submit (ham or spam) options to `AkismetHelper`
-
Patricio Cano authored
- New concern `AkismetSubmittable` to allow issues and other `Spammable` models to be submitted to Akismet. - New model `UserAgentDetail` to store information needed for Akismet. - Services needed for their creation and tests.
-
Robert Speicher authored
Add method missing from EE ## Why was this MR needed? `ProjectWiki#repository_exists?` is present in EE but not on CE, and there's no particular reason why it shouldn't See merge request !5802
-
Douwe Maan authored
Show deployment status on a MR view ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Resolves #19571, one in the list of #19992 ## Screenshots (if relevant) external_url = nil ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.57.03](/uploads/20ea1587eea556c7a1acd0ff726a5bfb/Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.57.03.png) external_url != nil ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.59.59](/uploads/0094b9ddece3f4bf76c83988840c096d/Screen_Shot_2016-08-02_at_13.59.59.png) Note, the timings are weird between merging and deploying, that is because I did it in the wrong order. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing See merge request !5622
-
Douwe Maan authored
Limit the size of SVGs when viewing them as blobs ## What does this MR do? This MR prevents rendering of SVG blobs larger than 2 MB. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I couldn't figure out how to properly test the view for this as this requires a large SVG (inflating the repository size) _or_ stubbing, the latter doesn't really seem possible using Spinach and all the stuff potentially involved. ## Why was this MR needed? When rendering large SVG blobs (e.g. 20 MB files) a request may time out and consume a lot of memory. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #1435 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![svg_notice](/uploads/c8de32522eda95a41a24555c3f85bfc1/svg_notice.jpg) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [x] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) cc @jschatz1 @annabeldunstone (there are some UI changes, see the above screenshot). See merge request !5794
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Use new PhantomJS version ## What does this MR do? Makes CI builds to use PhantomJS 2.1.1. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## What are the relevant issue numbers? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5740
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-